• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适用于矩阵领导结构的梅奥领导力影响指数:初步效度证据

The Mayo Leadership Impact Index Adapted for Matrix Leadership Structures: Initial Validity Evidence.

作者信息

Ashmore Jamile A, Waddimba Anthony C, Douglas Megan E, Coombes Stacey V, Shanafelt Tait D, DiMaio J Michael

机构信息

Office of Professionalism and Well-Being, Baylor Scott & White-The Heart Hospital, Plano, TX, USA.

College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Aug 14;16:315-327. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S465170. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/JHL.S465170
PMID:39161696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11330859/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Physician burnout has reached crisis levels. Supportive leadership is one of the strongest drivers of physician well-being, and monitoring supervisor support is key to developing well-being focused leadership skills. Existing measures of leader support were designed within "direct report" supervision structures limiting their applicability to matrixed leadership reporting structures where direct reports are not the predominant norm. Antecedently, no measure of leadership support is validated specifically for implementation in matrixed leadership structures.

OBJECTIVE

Adapt and validate the Mayo Leadership Impact Index (MLII) for settings with matrixed leadership structures.

DESIGN

A psychometric validation study utilizing classical test theory and item response theory.

SETTING

A tripartite hospital system in the southwestern US.

PARTICIPANTS

Physician-respondents to a 2023 cross-sectional survey.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

After pilot testing, the adapted MLII was examined using a unidimensional graded response model and confirmatory factor analyses. Convergent validity was investigated via correlations with professional fulfillment, perceived autonomy support, self-valuation, and peer connectedness/respect. Divergent validity was tested via correlations with burnout.

RESULTS

Of the three candidate revisions of the MLII, the 9-item adaptation was selected for its superior validity/reliability indices. Standardized Cronbach's and Ordinal alpha coefficients were 0.958 and 0.973, respectively. CFA loadings exceeded 0.70 (p < 0.001), and coefficients of variation (R) exceeded 0.60 for all items. GRM slope parameters indicated "high" to "very high" item discrimination. Items 2, 5, and 8 were the most informative. Positive correlations of the adapted MLII with professional fulfillment, perceived autonomy support, and peer connectedness/respect were observed, supporting convergent validity. Negative correlation with overall burnout supports divergent validity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings provide evidence of the adapted MLII's validity, reliability, and appropriateness for implementation within matrixed leadership settings. Prior to this study, no leadership support measure had been validated for use among the growing number of healthcare systems with matrixed leadership reporting structures.

摘要

重要性

医生职业倦怠已达到危机程度。支持型领导是医生幸福感的最强驱动因素之一,监测上级支持是培养以幸福感为重点的领导技能的关键。现有的领导支持衡量标准是在“直接下属”监督结构中设计的,限制了其在矩阵式领导汇报结构中的适用性,在这种结构中,直接下属并非主要常态。此前,没有专门针对矩阵式领导结构实施而验证的领导支持衡量标准。

目的

针对具有矩阵式领导结构的环境,对梅奥领导影响力指数(MLII)进行改编和验证。

设计

一项利用经典测试理论和项目反应理论的心理测量学验证研究。

背景

美国西南部的一个三方医院系统。

参与者

对2023年横断面调查做出回应的医生。

主要结果和指标

经过预测试后,使用单维分级反应模型和验证性因素分析对改编后的MLII进行检验。通过与职业成就感、感知到的自主支持、自我价值感以及同伴联系/尊重之间的相关性来研究收敛效度。通过与职业倦怠的相关性来测试区分效度。

结果

在MLII的三个候选修订版中,9项改编版因其卓越的效度/信度指标而被选中。标准化克朗巴哈系数和序数阿尔法系数分别为0.958和0.973。验证性因素分析的载荷超过0.70(p < 0.001),所有项目的变异系数(R)超过0.60。分级反应模型斜率参数表明项目区分度为“高”到“非常高”。项目2、5和8提供的信息最多。观察到改编后的MLII与职业成就感、感知到的自主支持以及同伴联系/尊重呈正相关,支持收敛效度。与总体职业倦怠呈负相关支持区分效度。

结论与意义

研究结果为改编后的MLII在矩阵式领导环境中的效度、信度和适用性提供了证据。在本研究之前,没有针对越来越多具有矩阵式领导汇报结构的医疗系统验证过领导支持衡量标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17a/11330859/21c30e23dde8/JHL-16-315-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17a/11330859/856ff61aeafd/JHL-16-315-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17a/11330859/cd3e2a608c90/JHL-16-315-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17a/11330859/21c30e23dde8/JHL-16-315-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17a/11330859/856ff61aeafd/JHL-16-315-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17a/11330859/cd3e2a608c90/JHL-16-315-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17a/11330859/21c30e23dde8/JHL-16-315-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Mayo Leadership Impact Index Adapted for Matrix Leadership Structures: Initial Validity Evidence.适用于矩阵领导结构的梅奥领导力影响指数:初步效度证据
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Aug 14;16:315-327. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S465170. eCollection 2024.
2
Leading the charge in the education sector: development and validation of the School Implementation Leadership Scale (SILS).引领教育领域:学校实施领导力量表(SILS)的开发与验证。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jul 19;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01222-7.
3
The Virtual Care Climate Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Measuring Perceived Support for Autonomy in a Virtual Care Setting.虚拟护理环境问卷:一种测量虚拟护理环境中自主感知支持的问卷的开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 8;19(5):e155. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6714.
4
Association of Burnout, Professional Fulfillment, and Self-care Practices of Physician Leaders With Their Independently Rated Leadership Effectiveness.医生领导者的倦怠、职业满足感和自我保健实践与其独立评价的领导力有效性之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207961. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7961.
5
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Professional Fulfillment Index among healthcare professionals: A validation study.日本版医疗保健专业人员专业成就感指数的信度和效度:一项验证研究。
J Occup Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;65(1):e12422. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12422.
6
Physicians' perceptions of autonomy support during transition to value-based reimbursement: A multi-center psychometric evaluation of six-item and three-item measures.医生在向基于价值的报销过渡期间对自主权支持的看法:六分量表和三分量表的多中心心理测量评估。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 1;15(4):e0230907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230907. eCollection 2020.
7
Translation and psychometric properties of the Persian version of self-management of type 1 diabetes for adolescents.青少年1型糖尿病自我管理波斯语版本的翻译及心理测量特性
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jul 1;29(7):761-7. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2015-0403.
8
Exploring the Validity Based on Internal Structure of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory - Medical Student (OLBI-MS).基于医学生版奥尔登堡倦怠量表(OLBI-MS)内部结构探索其效度
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Jan-Mar;35(1):37-51. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.2018695. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
9
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
10
Validity and reliability of the transculturally adapted Spanish version of the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS).《实施领导力量表》(ILS)跨文化适应西班牙语版本的效度与信度
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Sep 12;4(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00495-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing Perceived Mental Health Service Needs, Self-Reported Utilization, and Barriers to Care among Health System Faculty and Staff.影响卫生系统教职员工心理健康服务需求认知、自我报告利用率及护理障碍的因素
J Occup Environ Med. 2025 Aug 5. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003518.
2
Enhancing a Faculty Development Program: Identifying and Addressing Leadership Skill Gaps Using an Established Leadership Framework.加强教师发展计划:使用既定的领导力框架识别并解决领导力技能差距。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 Jun 7;17:259-268. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S517476. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Do Organizational Values and Leadership Impact Staff Engagement, Wellbeing, and Patient Satisfaction?组织价值观和领导力会影响员工敬业度、幸福感及患者满意度吗?
J Healthc Leadersh. 2023 Sep 11;15:209-219. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S421692. eCollection 2023.
2
Linking leadership development programs for physicians with organization-level outcomes: a realist review.将医师领导力发展计划与组织层面结果联系起来:一个现实主义的综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 21;23(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09811-y.
3
Occupational Characteristics Associated With Professional Fulfillment and Burnout Among US Physiatrists.
美国物理治疗师职业成就与职业倦怠相关的职业特征
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 May 1;102(5):379-388. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002216. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Impact of leadership behaviour on physician well-being, burnout, professional fulfilment and intent to leave: a multicentre cross-sectional survey study.领导力行为对医生的幸福感、倦怠感、职业成就感和离职意向的影响:一项多中心横断面调查研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 3;12(6):e057554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057554.
5
Associations of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care: systematic review and meta-analysis.医生职业倦怠与职业投入和患者护理质量的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 Sep 14;378:e070442. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070442.
6
Assessing Professional Fulfillment and Burnout Among CEOs and Other Healthcare Administrative Leaders in the United States.评估美国首席执行官和其他医疗保健行政领导人的职业满意度和倦怠情况。
J Healthc Manag. 2022;67(5):317-338. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-22-00012. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
7
Mistreatment Experiences, Protective Workplace Systems, and Occupational Distress in Physicians.医生遭受虐待的经历、保护职场系统和职业压力。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2210768. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10768.
8
Social Support, Social Isolation, and Burnout: Cross-Sectional Study of U.S. Residents Exploring Associations With Individual, Interpersonal, Program, and Work-Related Factors.社会支持、社会隔离与倦怠:一项对美国居民的横断面研究,旨在探讨个体、人际、项目和工作相关因素与这些问题的关联。
Acad Med. 2022 Aug 1;97(8):1184-1194. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004709. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
9
Changes in Burnout and Satisfaction With Work-Life Integration in Physicians and the General US Working Population Between 2011 and 2020.2011 年至 2020 年期间医生和美国普通劳动人口的倦怠和工作-生活融合满意度变化。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2022 Mar;97(3):491-506. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.11.021.
10
COVID-Related Stress and Work Intentions in a Sample of US Health Care Workers.美国医护人员样本中与新冠病毒相关的压力及工作意向
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Dec;5(6):1165-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Dec 8.