Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Oct 3;12(10):e0028024. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00280-24. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of echinocandins against spp. does not represent the actual inhibition threshold of echinocandins. Therefore, the recommended method to evaluate their activity is determining the minimum effective concentration (MEC) in broth microdilution, a method that is less common in clinical settings. This study aimed to assess a user-friendly commercial method, Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), to determine the effectiveness of echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin) against spp. Echinocandins MEC was determined against 23 isolates of spp. using SYO and the reference Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method. MECs were read with an inverted microscope and a reading mirror. Essential agreement (EA) between the tested methods was defined as a ±twofold dilution difference. There was a high EA (91%-100%) between the reference method and SYO in determining echinocandins MEC against isolates using inverted microscopy. A high EA was also observed between SYO MEC determined by inverted microscopy and a reading mirror, but different incubation times were required. SYO is a reliable, simple method for determining the MEC of echinocandins against isolates, preferably with an inverted microscope, and can be easily used in clinical laboratories when echinocandin susceptibility testing is required.IMPORTANCEUsing a commercial method such as Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) to determine the minimum effective concentration (MEC) of echinocandins against spp. has been shown to be a reliable alternative to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference method. This makes it more suitable for high-volume clinical laboratories. SYO provides accurate results comparable to the standard method and could potentially improve patient care by guiding more optimal antifungal treatment choices for patients with infections.
棘白菌素对 spp. 的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)并不代表棘白菌素的实际抑制阈值。因此,评估其活性的推荐方法是在肉汤微量稀释中确定最低有效浓度(MEC),这是一种在临床环境中不太常见的方法。本研究旨在评估一种用户友好的商业方法 Sensititre YeastOne(SYO),以确定棘白菌素(卡泊芬净、阿尼芬净和米卡芬净)对 spp. 的疗效。使用 SYO 和参考临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)方法测定 23 株 spp. 的棘白菌素 MEC。使用倒置显微镜和读数镜读取 MEC。测试方法之间的基本一致性(EA)定义为两倍稀释差异。使用倒置显微镜测定棘白菌素对 spp. 的 MEC 时,参考方法与 SYO 之间具有很高的 EA(91%-100%)。使用倒置显微镜和读数镜观察 SYO 确定的 MEC 时,也观察到很高的 EA,但需要不同的孵育时间。SYO 是一种可靠、简单的方法,可用于确定棘白菌素对 spp. 分离株的 MEC,最好使用倒置显微镜,当需要进行棘白菌素药敏试验时,可在临床实验室中轻松使用。
使用 Sensititre YeastOne(SYO)等商业方法来确定棘白菌素对 spp. 的最低有效浓度(MEC)已被证明是临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)参考方法的可靠替代方法。这使其更适合大容量临床实验室。SYO 提供与标准方法可比的准确结果,并通过指导对 感染患者更优化的抗真菌治疗选择,有可能改善患者的护理。