Suppr超能文献

曲霉属分离株的卡泊芬净 E 试验终点与参考最低有效浓度的一致性较差。

Caspofungin Etest endpoint for Aspergillus isolates shows poor agreement with the reference minimum effective concentration.

机构信息

Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta Hospital, Walter C. Mackenzie Centre 2B3.13, 8440 112 St., Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2J2, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Feb;48(2):479-82. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01677-09. Epub 2009 Dec 9.

Abstract

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M38-A2 reference broth microdilution (BMD) method for the antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi now includes guidelines for testing echinocandin activity using the minimum effective concentration (MEC) as the endpoint measurement. In this study, we compared the caspofungin Etest MIC on RPMI agar and Mueller-Hinton agar (supplemented with glucose and methylene blue [MGM]) to the BMD MEC for 345 clinical Aspergillus isolates, including A. flavus, A. fumigatus, A. nidulans, A. niger, and A. terreus. The essential agreement (+/-1 log(2) dilution) of the Etest on MGM and RPMI agar with the reference BMD MEC was 18 and 26%, respectively. The geometric mean values for BMD MEC and MGM Etest were 0.137 and 0.024 microg/ml, respectively, and the geometric mean values for BMD and RPMI agar were 0.128 and 0.031 microg/ml, respectively. Comparatively, 91% of paired MGM and RPMI Etest results were within 2 log(2) dilutions of each other and consistently produced clearly defined endpoints. In conclusion, the caspofungin Etest MIC, like the BMD MEC, is a reproducible endpoint but is markedly lower than the reference BMD. In anticipation of susceptibility breakpoint assignments, optimization studies will be required to improve the concordance of these two assays so that the potential for underreporting echinocandin resistance in Aspergillus is mitigated.

摘要

CLSI M38-A2 参考肉汤微量稀释(BMD)方法现已包含使用最小有效浓度(MEC)作为终点测量值来测试棘白菌素活性的指南,用于丝状真菌的抗真菌药敏试验。在这项研究中,我们将 RPMI 琼脂和 Mueller-Hinton 琼脂(添加葡萄糖和亚甲蓝[MGM])上的卡泊芬净 Etest MIC 与 BMD MEC 进行比较,以测试包括黄曲霉、烟曲霉、构巢曲霉、黑曲霉和土曲霉在内的 345 株临床曲霉菌分离株。Etest 在 MGM 和 RPMI 琼脂上与参考 BMD MEC 的基本一致性(+/-1 log(2)稀释)分别为 18%和 26%。BMD MEC 和 MGM Etest 的几何平均值分别为 0.137 和 0.024 microg/ml,BMD 和 RPMI 琼脂的几何平均值分别为 0.128 和 0.031 microg/ml。相比之下,91%的配对 MGM 和 RPMI Etest 结果在彼此的 2 log(2)稀释范围内,并且始终产生清晰定义的终点。总之,卡泊芬净 Etest MIC 与 BMD MEC 一样,是一个可重复的终点,但明显低于参考 BMD。为了预测药敏断点的分配,需要进行优化研究,以提高这两种检测方法的一致性,从而减轻曲霉菌棘白菌素耐药性报告不足的潜在风险。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
A 9-Year Experience of Infections from Isfahan, Iran.来自伊朗伊斯法罕的感染情况:9年经验总结
Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Jul 14;13:2301-2309. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S259162. eCollection 2020.
4
(New) Methods for Detection of Resistance in Clinical Samples.临床样本中耐药性检测的(新)方法
Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2019 Sep;13(3):129-136. doi: 10.1007/s12281-019-00342-w. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验