Willis Matthew, Fastenau Anil, Penna Srilekha, Klabbers Gonnie
Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marie Adelaide Leprosy Centre, Karachi, Pakistan.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Aug 22;4(8):e0003440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003440. eCollection 2024.
Stigmatisation is a major issue faced by those affected by leprosy globally. Reducing stigmatisation encourages care seeking behaviour to occur earlier and can help reduce harm and spread of leprosy. This systematic literature review aimed to summarise what effective stigma reducing interventions exist for leprosy, and as a secondary question explore what evidence exists regarding their cost. A systematic literature review was conducted. Three databases-PubMed, Embase and Web of science-were searched using the search terms "leprosy", "interven*", "reduc*", and "stigma*".Seventeen publications were eligible for inclusion in the review. The current manuscript identified interventions under 6 main categories (i) Information, education, and communication (IEC) (ii) community led projects, (iii) Socioeconomic rehabilitation, (iv) mixed interventions, (v) integration of leprosy within the health system and (vi) Cosmetic or surgical care. Specific evidence regarding cost was only provided by one out of the seventeen papers. Multiple interventions were shown to successfully reduce leprosy related stigma, however, information on their cost is not readily available. The evidence uncovered by this review is restricted to three Asian countries; Nepal, India and Indonesia. To ensure the success of stigma reduction in leprosy interventions worldwide these interventions need to be tried in other leprosy endemic areas to test their effectiveness across contextual and cultural scenarios.
污名化是全球麻风病患者面临的一个主要问题。减少污名化有助于促使人们更早地寻求治疗,从而有助于减少麻风病的危害和传播。本系统文献综述旨在总结现有的有效减少麻风病污名化的干预措施,并作为次要问题探讨关于其成本的现有证据。我们进行了一项系统文献综述。使用搜索词“麻风病”、“干预*”、“减少*”和“污名*”在三个数据库——PubMed、Embase和科学网——中进行了检索。17篇出版物符合纳入该综述的条件。本手稿确定了6个主要类别的干预措施:(i)信息、教育和宣传(IEC);(ii)社区主导项目;(iii)社会经济康复;(iv)综合干预;(v)将麻风病纳入卫生系统;(vi)美容或手术护理。17篇论文中只有1篇提供了关于成本的具体证据。多项干预措施已被证明能成功减少与麻风病相关的污名,但关于其成本的信息却难以获取。本综述所揭示的证据仅限于三个亚洲国家:尼泊尔、印度和印度尼西亚。为确保全球减少麻风病污名化干预措施的成功,需要在其他麻风病流行地区尝试这些干预措施,以检验其在不同背景和文化情况下的有效性。