The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour, and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.
Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
JMIR Aging. 2024 Aug 23;7:e56055. doi: 10.2196/56055.
Assistive technology is becoming increasingly accessible and affordable for supporting people with dementia and their care partners living at home, with strong potential for technology-based prompting to assist with initiation and tracking of complex, multistep activities of daily living. However, there is limited direct comparison of different prompt features to guide optimal technology design.
Across 3 experiments, we investigated the features of tablet-based prompts that best support people with dementia to complete activities of daily living at home, measuring prompt effectiveness and gaining feedback from people with dementia and their care partners about their experiences.
Across experiments, we developed a specialized iPad app to enable data collection with people with dementia at home over an extended experimental period. In experiment 1, we varied the prompts in a 3 (visual type: text instruction, iconic image, and photographic image) × 3 (audio type: no sound, symbolic sound, and verbal instruction) experimental design using repeated measures across multiple testing sessions involving single-step activities. In experiment 2, we tested the most effective prompt breakdown for complex multistep tasks comparing 3 conditions (1-prompt, 3-prompt, and 7-prompt conditions). In experiment 3, we compared initiation and maintenance alerts that involved either an auditory tone or an auditory tone combined with a verbal instruction. Throughout, we asked people with dementia and their care partners to reflect on the usefulness of prompting technology in their everyday lives and what could be developed to better meet their needs.
First, our results showed that audible verbal instructions were more useful for task completion than either tone-based or visual prompts. Second, a more granular breakdown of tasks was generally more useful and increased independent use, but this varied across individuals. Third, while a voice or text maintenance alert enabled people with dementia to persist with a multistep task for longer when it was more frequent, task initiation still frequently required support from a care partner.
These findings can help inform developers of assistive technology about the design features that promote the usefulness of home prompting systems for people with dementia as well as the preferences and insights of people with dementia and their care partners regarding assistive technology design.
辅助技术越来越普及,价格也越来越实惠,可用于支持居家的痴呆症患者及其照护者,具有通过基于技术的提示来辅助启动和跟踪复杂的多步骤日常生活活动的巨大潜力。然而,不同提示功能的直接比较有限,无法为最佳技术设计提供指导。
通过 3 项实验,我们研究了支持痴呆症患者在家中完成日常生活活动的最佳平板电脑提示功能,衡量了提示的有效性,并从痴呆症患者及其照护者那里获得了他们对使用体验的反馈。
在 3 项实验中,我们开发了一款专用的 iPad 应用程序,以在扩展的实验期间在家中收集痴呆症患者的数据。在实验 1 中,我们在多次测试会话中使用重复测量,在单次步骤活动中,我们使用了 3(视觉类型:文字说明、图标图像和照片图像)×3(音频类型:无声、符号声音和口头指令)的实验设计来改变提示,从而改变了提示的功能。在实验 2 中,我们测试了最有效的复杂多步骤任务的提示分解,比较了 3 种条件(1 个提示条件、3 个提示条件和 7 个提示条件)。在实验 3 中,我们比较了涉及声音或声音加口头指令的启动和维持警报。在整个实验过程中,我们让痴呆症患者及其照护者反思提示技术在日常生活中的有用性,以及可以开发出哪些功能来更好地满足他们的需求。
首先,我们的研究结果表明,口头指令比基于声音或视觉的提示更有助于完成任务。其次,任务的更细粒度的分解通常更有用,可以提高独立使用的频率,但这因人而异。第三,虽然频繁的语音或文字维持警报可以使痴呆症患者在多步骤任务中坚持更长时间,但任务启动仍然经常需要照护者的支持。
这些发现可以帮助辅助技术的开发者了解设计功能,这些功能可以提高痴呆症患者家庭提示系统的实用性,同时也可以了解痴呆症患者及其照护者对辅助技术设计的偏好和见解。