Suppr超能文献

使用简单技术促使痴呆症患者在家中完成多步骤任务:一项比较提示形式的探索性研究。

Using simple technology to prompt multistep tasks in the home for people with dementia: An exploratory study comparing prompting formats.

作者信息

Boyd Hazel C, Evans Nina M, Orpwood Roger D, Harris Nigel D

机构信息

Designability (Bath Institute of Medical Engineering), Bath, UK.

Bath Institute of Medical Engineering, Bath, UK.

出版信息

Dementia (London). 2017 May;16(4):424-442. doi: 10.1177/1471301215602417. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the relative effectiveness of different prompts for people with dementia during multistep tasks in the home, to inform prompting technology design. Methods Nine pairs of participants (one with dementia and a partner or relative) participated at home. The participants with mild to moderate dementia (5M/4F, aged 73-86 years) functioned at the Planned or Exploratory levels of the Pool Activity Level instrument. A touchscreen computer displayed different prompts during two set tasks: "card-and-envelope" and "CD player." The trials were scored to establish the relative effectiveness of the prompts. Individual tasks were also explored. Results Text and audio prompts were each more effective than video or picture prompts for a card-and-envelope task, but this was not seen in a CD player task. The differences may be related to the type of actions within the tasks; the card-and-envelope actions were easier to convey verbally; the CD player actions lent themselves to visual prompts. Conclusions Designers of technology-based prompts for people with dementia should consider that the effectiveness of different prompts is likely to be task dependent. Familiar, unambiguous language can increase the success of tailored prompts. There are significant practical challenges associated with choosing and deconstructing everyday tasks at home.

摘要

目的 研究针对家中多步骤任务中痴呆症患者的不同提示方式的相对有效性,为提示技术设计提供参考。方法 九对参与者(一对为患有痴呆症的患者及其伴侣或亲属)在家中参与实验。患有轻度至中度痴呆症的参与者(5名男性/4名女性,年龄73 - 86岁)在Pool活动水平量表的计划或探索水平上发挥功能。在两项设定任务(“卡片与信封”和“CD播放机”)中,触摸屏电脑显示不同的提示。对试验进行评分以确定提示的相对有效性。还对个别任务进行了探究。结果 在“卡片与信封”任务中,文本和音频提示比视频或图片提示更有效,但在“CD播放机”任务中未观察到这种情况。差异可能与任务中的动作类型有关;“卡片与信封”动作更易于通过口头传达;“CD播放机”动作适合视觉提示。结论 为痴呆症患者设计基于技术的提示时,设计者应考虑不同提示的有效性可能取决于任务。熟悉、明确的语言可提高定制提示的成功率。在家中选择和拆解日常任务存在重大实际挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/484d/5424854/dd8436cfa649/10.1177_1471301215602417-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验