• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喷雾冲洗在软式内镜再处理中的效果:一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy of spray flushing in the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.

West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 21;30(31):3680-3688. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i31.3680.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v30.i31.3680
PMID:39192996
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11346163/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Commonly used cleaning brushes in the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes often cause damage within the working channels.

AIM

To develop a spray flushing system to achieving effective cleaning of the working channels while minimizing damage.

METHODS

This prospective study included 60 used endoscopes and 60 Teflon tubes randomly divided into a control group ( = 30) and an experimental group ( = 30). The material of Teflon tubes was the same as that of the endoscope working channel. Endoscopes in the control group were manually cleaned using traditional cleaning brushes, while those in the experimental group were cleaned using the newly developed spray flushing system. ATP levels, cleanliness, and microbiological testing of the working channels were measured. Additionally, Teflon tubes in the control group underwent 500 passes with a cleaning brush, while those in the experimental group were subjected to the spray flushing system, and channel damage was evaluated.

RESULTS

The ATP levels (RLU) in the two groups were 32.5 (13-66) and 26 (16-40), respectively ( > 0.05). Cleanliness scores were 1.5 (1-2) and 1 (1-2), respectively ( > 0.05). Debris was found in 73.3% of the control group, which was significantly higher than 46.7% in the experimental group ( < 0.05). Microbiological tests for both groups yielded negative results. Teflon tube damage in the control group was rated at 4 (4-5.25), which was significantly higher than in the experimental group 4 (3-4) ( < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The spray flushing system demonstrated superior efficacy in removing debris and resulted in less damage to the endoscope working channels compared with traditional cleaning brushes.

摘要

背景

在软性内镜的再处理过程中,常用的清洗刷常导致工作通道内的损伤。

目的

开发一种喷雾冲洗系统,在最小化损伤的同时实现工作通道的有效清洗。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了 60 个使用过的内镜和 60 个特氟龙管,随机分为对照组(n=30)和实验组(n=30)。特氟龙管的材料与内镜工作通道相同。对照组的内镜采用传统清洗刷手动清洗,实验组采用新开发的喷雾冲洗系统清洗。测量工作通道的 ATP 水平、清洁度和微生物检测。此外,对照组的特氟龙管经过 500 次清洗刷清洗,实验组则经过喷雾冲洗系统,评估通道损伤。

结果

两组的 ATP 水平(RLU)分别为 32.5(13-66)和 26(16-40)(>0.05)。清洁度评分分别为 1.5(1-2)和 1(1-2)(>0.05)。对照组有 73.3%发现有碎片,明显高于实验组的 46.7%(<0.05)。两组的微生物检测结果均为阴性。对照组的特氟龙管损伤评分 4(4-5.25)明显高于实验组的 4(3-4)(<0.01)。

结论

与传统清洗刷相比,喷雾冲洗系统在去除碎片方面效果更好,且对内镜工作通道的损伤更小。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of spray flushing in the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes: A randomized controlled trial.喷雾冲洗在软式内镜再处理中的效果:一项随机对照试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 21;30(31):3680-3688. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i31.3680.
2
[HYGEA (Hygiene in gastroenterology--endoscope reprocessing): Study on quality of reprocessing flexible endoscopes in hospitals and in the practice setting].[胃肠病学中的卫生——内镜再处理(HYGEA):医院和实际操作环境中软性内镜再处理质量的研究]
Z Gastroenterol. 2002 Mar;40(3):157-70. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-22326.
3
Inconsistencies in endoscope-reprocessing and infection-control guidelines: the importance of endoscope drying.内窥镜再处理与感染控制指南中的不一致之处:内窥镜干燥的重要性。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):2147-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00712.x.
4
The use of rapid indicators for the detection of organic residues on clinically used gastrointestinal endoscopes with and without visually apparent debris.使用快速指标检测临床使用的有或无明显可见碎片的胃肠内窥镜上的有机残留物。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;35(8):987-94. doi: 10.1086/677148. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
5
Contribution of usage to endoscope working channel damage and bacterial contamination.使用对内窥镜工作通道的损坏和细菌污染的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Jun;105(2):176-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
6
Liquid disinfecting and sterilization reprocessors used for flexible endoscopes.用于软性内窥镜的液体消毒和灭菌再处理器。
Health Devices. 1994 Jun;23(6):212-53.
7
Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes.软性内镜的再处理
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 Oct;15 Suppl:G73-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02269.x.
8
Adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence for bacteriologic surveillance and reprocessing strategies for minimizing risk of infection transmission by duodenoscopes.用于细菌学监测的三磷酸腺苷生物发光法以及十二指肠镜感染传播风险最小化的再处理策略。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1180-1187.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.035. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
9
Reprocessing endoscopes: United States perspective.内镜再处理:美国视角
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S27-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.035.
10
[Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories - an international comparison of guidelines].[软性内镜及内镜附件的再处理——指南的国际比较]
Z Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul;40(7):531-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32807.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity of the efficacy of the spray flushing cleaning method in flexible endoscope reprocessing.喷雾冲洗清洁方法在软性内镜再处理中的有效性
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 21;31(11):101743. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i11.101743.
2
Efficacy of spray flushing in the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes.喷雾冲洗在软性内镜再处理中的效果
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jan 16;17(1):100298. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i1.100298.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigation of the Internal Conditions of 213 Reprocessed Endoscopic Channels.213条再处理内镜通道内部状况的调查
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023 Feb 1;33(1):4-11. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001141.
2
Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes and accessories.关于柔性消化内镜及附件再处理的多学会指南。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):11-33.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.048.
3
STANDARDS OF INFECTION PREVENTION IN REPROCESSING FLEXIBLE GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPES.软性胃肠道内镜再处理中的感染预防标准
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2020 May/Jun;43(3):E142-E158. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000536.
4
Contribution of usage to endoscope working channel damage and bacterial contamination.使用对内窥镜工作通道的损坏和细菌污染的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Jun;105(2):176-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
5
Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories used in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) - Update 2018.经胃肠道内镜使用的软性内镜及附件的再处理:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)和欧洲胃肠病学护士和相关人员学会(ESGENA)的立场声明-2018 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2018 Dec;50(12):1205-1234. doi: 10.1055/a-0759-1629. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
6
Comparison of automated and manual drying in the elimination of residual endoscope working channel fluid after reprocessing (with video).自动化与手动干燥在消除内镜再处理后工作通道内残留液体的效果比较(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jan;89(1):124-132.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.033. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
7
Simethicone is retained in endoscopes despite reprocessing: impact of its use on working channel fluid retention and adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence values (with video).尽管经过重新处理,二甲硅油仍会残留在内窥镜中:其使用对工作通道流体保留和三磷酸腺苷生物发光值的影响(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jan;89(1):115-123. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
8
Inspection of endoscope instrument channels after reprocessing using a prototype borescope.使用原型硬管内窥镜检查内镜器械通道清洗消毒后的情况。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct;88(4):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2366. Epub 2018 May 9.
9
ASGE guideline for infection control during GI endoscopy.美国胃肠内镜学会(ASGE)关于胃肠内镜检查期间感染控制的指南。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1167-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
10
Scoping the scope: endoscopic evaluation of endoscope working channels with a new high-resolution inspection endoscope (with video).范围界定:使用新型高分辨率检查内镜对内窥镜工作通道进行内镜评估(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct;88(4):601-611.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Feb 6.