Predoiu Radu, Piotrowski Andrzej, Stan Elena Amelia, Ciolacu Mihai Valentin, Bitang Andrei, Croitoru Doina, Cosma Germina
Department of Teacher Training, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, National University of Physical Education and Sports, Bucharest, Romania.
Institute of Psychology, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 13;15:1451244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451244. eCollection 2024.
Aggression in sports is often perceived as a necessary trait for success, especially in martial arts. Aggression can be assessed both explicitly and implicitly, taking into account the dual processing model. The purpose of the research was to examine explicit and indirect, latency-based measure of aggression in competitive athletes practicing striking combat sports, according to gender and sports performance. At the same time, we verified whether aggression (implicit/unconscious and explicit) predicts sports performance in martial artists.
A total of 85 athletes practicing striking combat sports took part in the research. For implicit, latency-based measure of aggression, an Implicit Associations Test (IAT) was used, while explicit aggression was assessed with the Romanian adaptation of the Makarowski's Aggression Questionnaire for martial arts athletes.
Data analysis revealed (using multivariate analysis of variance) that athletes from striking combat sports having international sports performances registered significantly higher D-scores (IAT, = 0.014) and lower values for Go-ahead factor ( = 0.006), compared to athletes without outstanding results. Goodman and Kruskal tau association test was used to check the existing associations between athletes' gender and martial arts athletes' level of explicit and implicit aggression. In addition, binomial logistic regression procedures were performed, predicting martial artists' likelihood to obtain higher sports results, based on explicit and indirect aggression.
A stronger association between Aggression and Others (at implicit/unconscious level) and a moderate level (generally) for Go-ahead factor of explicit aggression are associated with an increased likelihood of sports performances in athletes. In addition, male martial arts athletes are more persistent despite obstacles, remaining more on the offensive (no gender-related association were found in terms of indirect/unconscious aggression, and for Foul Play and Assertiveness factors of explicit aggression). The study underlines the importance of addressing athletes' subconscious level to promote more constructive behaviors in competitions.
体育运动中的攻击性通常被视为取得成功的必要特质,尤其是在武术领域。考虑到双重加工模型,攻击性可以通过显性和隐性两种方式进行评估。本研究的目的是根据性别和运动成绩,检验从事搏击类竞技运动的运动员中,基于潜伏期的显性和间接攻击性测量方法。同时,我们还验证了攻击性(隐性/无意识和显性)是否能预测武术运动员的运动成绩。
共有85名从事搏击类竞技运动的运动员参与了本研究。对于基于潜伏期的隐性攻击性测量,使用了内隐联想测验(IAT),而显性攻击性则通过罗马尼亚语版的马卡罗夫斯基武术运动员攻击性问卷进行评估。
数据分析显示(使用多变量方差分析),与成绩不出众的运动员相比,在国际体育赛事中取得成绩的搏击类竞技运动运动员的D分数(IAT, = 0.014)显著更高,而前进因子的值更低( = 0.006)。使用古德曼和克鲁斯卡尔tau关联检验来检查运动员性别与武术运动员显性和隐性攻击水平之间的现有关联。此外,还进行了二项逻辑回归程序,根据显性和间接攻击性预测武术运动员获得更高运动成绩的可能性。
在运动员中,攻击性与他人之间更强的关联(在隐性/无意识水平上)以及显性攻击的前进因子的中等水平(一般而言)与运动成绩提高的可能性相关。此外,男性武术运动员在面对障碍时更具持久性,更倾向于进攻(在间接/无意识攻击以及显性攻击的犯规行为和果断性因子方面未发现与性别相关的关联)。该研究强调了关注运动员潜意识水平以促进比赛中更具建设性行为的重要性。