Vikestad Vidar, Dalen Terje
Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Faculty of Teacher Education and Arts, Nord University, 7600 Levanger, Norway.
Sports (Basel). 2024 Aug 20;12(8):226. doi: 10.3390/sports12080226.
This review investigates the effect of two different concurrent training sequences on endurance performance. The sequences investigated are Endurance-Resistance (ER) and Resistance-Endurance (RE). A literature search is conducted of the SPORTDiscus and Medline databases. The included studies are randomized control trials, which compare the effect of ER and RE on at least one endurance performance variable. A PEDro scale is used to assess the methodological quality of the articles in this review. Of a total of 152 articles identified during the initial screening, 15 studies meet the inclusion criteria. These studies include 426 participants (298 males and 128 females), with 212 of the participants training with ER and 214 with RE. The results are presented as the percentage change of the mean from pre- to post-test. All the studies show an improvement in endurance from pre to post for both interventions, except for the RE group in one study. This review finds small and non-conclusive sequence effects between ER and RE, suggesting that the sequence of concurrent training is not of great importance in relation to endurance performance.
本综述调查了两种不同的同时训练顺序对耐力表现的影响。所研究的顺序为耐力-阻力（ER）和阻力-耐力（RE）。对SPORTDiscus和Medline数据库进行了文献检索。纳入的研究为随机对照试验，比较了ER和RE对至少一个耐力表现变量的影响。使用PEDro量表评估本综述中文章的方法学质量。在初步筛选中确定的总共152篇文章中，有15项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究包括426名参与者（298名男性和128名女性），其中212名参与者进行ER训练，214名进行RE训练。结果以测试前到测试后均值的百分比变化表示。除一项研究中的RE组外，所有研究均显示两种干预措施从测试前到测试后耐力均有所提高。本综述发现ER和RE之间存在微小且无定论的顺序效应，这表明就耐力表现而言，同时训练的顺序并非至关重要。
