Wang Yiwen, Kuhlman D Michael, Roberts Kathryn, Yuan Bo, Zhang Zhen, Zhang Wei, Simons Robert F
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Fuzhou University, China.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, USA.
Biol Psychol. 2017 Jul;127:89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 May 2.
Social dilemmas pervade daily life, business, and politics. The manners in which these dilemmas are resolved depend in part on the personal characteristics of those involved. One such characteristic is Social Value Orientation (SVO), a trait-like predisposition to maximize cooperative (Pro-Social) or non-cooperative (Pro-Self) outcomes in social relationships. The present study investigated the role of SVO in modulating neural responses to outcomes in a type of social dilemma known as the Chicken Game. The Chicken Game models real-world situations involving two parties independently making a decision between cooperation and aggression. The EEG of Pro-Socials and Pro-Selfs was recorded while playing Chicken with a computer Opponent. Two ERP components were extracted: Feedback-Related Negativity (FRN) and the P300. Despite no behavioral differences in decision (i.e., cooperation, aggression), FRN results indicate that Pro-Socials experienced unreciprocated cooperation as the least desired outcome. Further, P300 results show a main effect for the Opponent's choice, such that the Opponent's cooperation was more salient than aggression. Additionally, an interaction between the Participant's and Opponent's choice showed that the effect for the Opponent's choice only occurred when the Participant chose cooperation. None of the results for P300 were moderated by SVO. For both ERP components, Pro-Selfs showed no differential responding to Chicken outcomes. In addition, FRN magnitude on trial n predicted choice on trial n+1 for Pro-Socials, but not for Pro-Selfs. P300 magnitude on trial n showed no relationship to choice on trial n+1. Results indicate that individual differences in SVO modulate FRN responses to Chicken outcomes, and that these neural reactions may have utility in predicting subsequent behaviors. For P300, there is no evidence of SVO modulation. Our general pattern of FRN responsiveness in Pro-Socials, but not in Pro-Selfs, is related to similar findings in fMRI and EEG research.
社会困境充斥着日常生活、商业和政治领域。解决这些困境的方式在一定程度上取决于相关人员的个人特质。其中一个特质就是社会价值取向(SVO),这是一种类似特质的倾向,即在社会关系中最大化合作(亲社会)或非合作(自我)结果。本研究调查了SVO在一种被称为“胆小鬼博弈”的社会困境中对结果的神经反应调节作用。“胆小鬼博弈”模拟了现实世界中涉及两方独立在合作与攻击之间做出决策的情况。在与计算机对手玩“胆小鬼博弈”时,记录了亲社会者和自我者的脑电图。提取了两个事件相关电位成分:反馈相关负波(FRN)和P300。尽管在决策(即合作、攻击)上没有行为差异,但FRN结果表明,亲社会者将未得到回应的合作视为最不理想的结果。此外,P300结果显示对手的选择有主效应,即对手的合作比攻击更显著。此外,参与者和对手选择之间的交互作用表明,对手选择的效应仅在参与者选择合作时出现。P300的结果均未受到SVO的调节。对于这两个事件相关电位成分,自我者对“胆小鬼博弈”结果没有表现出差异反应。此外,第n次试验的FRN幅度预测了亲社会者第n + 1次试验的选择,但对自我者没有预测作用。第n次试验的P300幅度与第n + 1次试验的选择没有关系。结果表明,SVO的个体差异调节了对“胆小鬼博弈”结果的FRN反应,并且这些神经反应可能有助于预测后续行为。对于P300,没有证据表明存在SVO调节。我们在亲社会者而非自我者中观察到的FRN反应模式,与功能磁共振成像和脑电图研究中的类似发现相关。