• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种在不确定性下进行合作决策的双过程方法。

A dual-process approach to cooperative decision-making under uncertainty.

作者信息

Costa Daniela, Arantes Joana, Keating José

机构信息

Psychology Research Center, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 22;17(3):e0265759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265759. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0265759
PMID:35316282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8939828/
Abstract

Cooperative behaviors are typically investigated using social dilemmas inserted into scenarios with well-known characteristics. Nonetheless, in real life, group members may be uncertain about what others will decide (social uncertainty) and the characteristics of the dilemma itself (environmental uncertainty). Previous studies have shown that uncertainty reduces the willingness to cooperate. Dual-process approaches to cooperation have given rise to two different views. Some authors argue that deliberation is needed to overrule selfish motives, whereas others argue that intuition favors cooperation. In this work, our goal was to investigate the role of intuitive mental processing on cooperation in a prisoner's dilemma game involving uncertainty. Our results showed that participants cooperated less with their counterparts as the number of rounds progressed, suggesting a learning process and that intuitive mental processing in the first 50 rounds appears to favor cooperation under both deterministic and stochastic conditions. These results may help clarify the literature's mixed effects regarding cognitive processing manipulation on cooperation. Developing a better understanding of these effects may improve strategies in social problems involving cooperation under uncertainty and cognitive constraints.

摘要

合作行为通常通过插入具有众所周知特征的情景中的社会困境来进行研究。然而,在现实生活中,小组成员可能不确定其他人会做出什么决定(社会不确定性)以及困境本身的特征(环境不确定性)。先前的研究表明,不确定性会降低合作意愿。合作的双过程方法产生了两种不同的观点。一些作者认为需要深思熟虑来否决自私动机,而另一些人则认为直觉有利于合作。在这项工作中,我们的目标是研究直觉心理加工在涉及不确定性的囚徒困境博弈中的合作作用。我们的结果表明,随着轮数的增加,参与者与对手的合作减少,这表明存在一个学习过程,并且在前50轮中,直觉心理加工在确定性和随机性条件下似乎都有利于合作。这些结果可能有助于澄清文献中关于认知加工操纵对合作的混合影响。更好地理解这些影响可能会改善在涉及不确定性和认知限制下合作的社会问题中的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/8eca04d45187/pone.0265759.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/4a4cec359b7f/pone.0265759.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/9c102b3fd664/pone.0265759.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/4823e5f948d7/pone.0265759.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/6a9fc8ebf21e/pone.0265759.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/780105d890a3/pone.0265759.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/2b608177e37a/pone.0265759.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/8eca04d45187/pone.0265759.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/4a4cec359b7f/pone.0265759.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/9c102b3fd664/pone.0265759.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/4823e5f948d7/pone.0265759.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/6a9fc8ebf21e/pone.0265759.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/780105d890a3/pone.0265759.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/2b608177e37a/pone.0265759.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02c/8939828/8eca04d45187/pone.0265759.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
A dual-process approach to cooperative decision-making under uncertainty.一种在不确定性下进行合作决策的双过程方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 22;17(3):e0265759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265759. eCollection 2022.
2
Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation.直觉、深思熟虑与合作的演变
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 26;113(4):936-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517780113. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
3
A quantitative description of the transition between intuitive altruism and rational deliberation in iterated Prisoner's Dilemma experiments.在迭代囚徒困境实验中,直观利他主义和理性思考之间的转变的定量描述。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 19;9(1):17046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52359-3.
4
Religion, parochialism and intuitive cooperation.宗教、狭隘主义与直觉合作。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):512-521. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01014-3. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
Social setting, intuition and experience in laboratory experiments interact to shape cooperative decision-making.社会环境、直觉以及实验室实验中的经验相互作用,从而塑造合作决策。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 22;282(1811). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0237.
6
Cognitive load decreases cooperation and moral punishment in a Prisoner's Dilemma game with punishment option.认知负荷会降低具有惩罚选项的囚徒困境游戏中的合作和道德惩罚。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 30;11(1):24500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04217-4.
7
The effect of attachment and environmental manipulations on cooperative behavior in the prisoner's dilemma game.依恋和环境操作对囚徒困境游戏中合作行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0205730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205730. eCollection 2018.
8
Expectation and cooperation in prisoner's dilemmas: The moderating role of game riskiness.囚徒困境中的期望与合作:博弈风险的调节作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):353-60. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0911-7.
9
Intuitive thinking impedes cooperation by decreasing cooperative expectations for pro-self but not for pro-social individuals.直觉思维通过降低自利个体而非利他个体的合作期望来阻碍合作。
J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan 2;163(1):62-78. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2022.2122768. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
10
Nationality dominates gender in decision-making in the Dictator and Prisoner's Dilemma Games.国籍在独裁者和囚徒困境游戏的决策中主导性别。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):e0244568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244568. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
The Group Intertemporal Decision-Making Process.群体跨期决策过程。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 14;14(9):815. doi: 10.3390/bs14090815.

本文引用的文献

1
On Dual- and Single-Process Models of Thinking.关于双重加工和单一加工模型的思考。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Nov;16(6):1412-1427. doi: 10.1177/1745691620964172. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
2
A quantitative description of the transition between intuitive altruism and rational deliberation in iterated Prisoner's Dilemma experiments.在迭代囚徒困境实验中,直观利他主义和理性思考之间的转变的定量描述。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 19;9(1):17046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52359-3.
3
Social uncertainty is heterogeneous and sometimes valuable.社会不确定性是异质性的,有时也是有价值的。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Aug;3(8):764. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0662-y.
4
Uncertainty about the impact of social decisions increases prosocial behaviour.社会决策影响的不确定性会增加亲社会行为。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Aug;2(8):573-580. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0372-x. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
5
Resolving uncertainty in a social world.解决社会世界中的不确定性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 May;3(5):426-435. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0590-x. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
6
Effect of exogenous testosterone on cooperation depends on personality and time pressure.外源性睾酮对合作的影响取决于个性和时间压力。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Feb;44(3):538-545. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0220-8. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
7
The Mythical Dual-Process Typology.神话般的双加工类型学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Aug;22(8):667-668. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
8
Tolerance to ambiguous uncertainty predicts prosocial behavior.对模糊不确定性的容忍度预测亲社会行为。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 12;9(1):2156. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04631-9.
9
Cooperation and decision time.合作与决策时间。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Apr;26:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 23.
10
Is intuition really cooperative? Improved tests support the social heuristics hypothesis.直觉真的具有协同性吗?改进后的测试支持社会启发式假说。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0190560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190560. eCollection 2018.