Department of Research, The Cooper Institute, Dallas, TX 75230, USA.
Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;21(8):1040. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081040.
The deleterious health effects of prolonged sitting and physical inactivity are well-established, yet these behaviors are pervasive in modern culture. To inform interventions aimed at reducing sedentary behavior and increasing lifestyle activity, this study examined psychological and behavioral economic factors that may be associated with these behaviors. This cross-sectional study was conducted among 4072 adults in Israel. Participants completed a survey pertaining to lifestyle behaviors and economic preferences using an online platform in September 2020. The psychological and behavioral economic factors of interest were patience, self-control, risk-taking, grit, and general self-efficacy. Sedentary behavior and lifestyle activity (e.g., time spent moving about) was assessed using the Rapid Assessment Disuse Index (RADI) tool (higher score indicative of more sitting and less activity). Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses examined the association between psychological and behavioral economic factors and RADI score. Among 4072 participants, those who were impatient (vs. patient, β: -1.13; 95% CI: -1.89, -0.38) had higher grit (β: -1.25, 95% CI: -1.73, -0.77), and those who were more risk-seeking (β: -0.23; 95% CI: -0.33, -0.13) had lower RADI scores (i.e., less sedentary, more active). Significant associations for grit and risk-taking were also observed when the RADI score was dichotomized, such that individuals who had higher grit or were more risk-seeking were more likely to be non-sedentary/active. No significant associations were observed for self-control or general self-efficacy. Higher grit and more risk-seeking were associated with a decreased propensity for sedentary behaviors and inactivity; these factors may provide targets for interventions aimed at reducing sedentary behavior and increasing lifestyle activity.
久坐和缺乏身体活动对健康的有害影响已得到充分证实,但这些行为在现代文化中普遍存在。为了为旨在减少久坐行为和增加生活方式活动的干预措施提供信息,本研究调查了可能与这些行为相关的心理和行为经济学因素。这项横断面研究在以色列的 4072 名成年人中进行。参与者于 2020 年 9 月使用在线平台完成了一项与生活方式行为和经济偏好相关的调查。感兴趣的心理和行为经济学因素包括耐心、自我控制、冒险、坚毅和一般自我效能感。久坐行为和生活方式活动(例如,四处走动的时间)使用快速评估失用指数(RADI)工具进行评估(得分越高表示坐得越多,活动越少)。多变量线性和逻辑回归分析检查了心理和行为经济学因素与 RADI 评分之间的关联。在 4072 名参与者中,那些缺乏耐心(vs. 有耐心,β:-1.13;95%CI:-1.89,-0.38)的人坚毅得分较低(β:-1.25,95%CI:-1.73,-0.77),而那些冒险倾向较高(β:-0.23;95%CI:-0.33,-0.13)的人 RADI 评分较低(即,较少久坐,更活跃)。当 RADI 评分分为二分变量时,坚毅和冒险的显著关联也存在,即坚毅得分较高或冒险倾向较高的个体更有可能非久坐/活跃。自我控制或一般自我效能感没有显著关联。更高的坚毅和更多的冒险倾向与减少久坐行为和不活动的倾向相关;这些因素可能为旨在减少久坐行为和增加生活方式活动的干预措施提供目标。