• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用分段生物测量法对新型巴雷特真实眼轴长度公式和优化镜片系数进行准确性验证。

Accuracy Validation of the New Barrett True Axial Length Formula and the Optimized Lens Factor Using Sum-of-Segment Biometry.

作者信息

Miyamoto Sumitaka, Kamiya Kazutaka

机构信息

Aira Miyamoto Eye Clinic, Kagoshima 899-5213, Japan.

Visual Physiology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kanagawa 252-0373, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 8;13(16):4639. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164639.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13164639
PMID:39200782
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11354565/
Abstract

This study aims to verify the accuracy of a new calculation formula, Barrett true axial length formula (T-AL), and the optimized lens factor (LF) for predicting postoperative refraction after cataract surgery. We included 156 Japanese patients who underwent cataract surgery using Clareon monofocal intraocular lenses at our clinic between January 2022 and June 2023. Postoperative spherical equivalent was calculated using subjective refraction values obtained 1 month post-surgery. The LFs were optimized so that the mean prediction error (PE) of each calculation formula was zero (zero optimization). We calculated the mean absolute PE (MAE) to assess accuracy and used a Friedman test for statistical comparisons. The accuracy of T-AL and the optimized LFs was compared with that of the conventional Barrett Universal II formula for ARGOS (AR-B) and OA-2000 (OA-B) with equivalent refractive index. For T-AL, AR-B, and OA-B, the MAEs ± standard deviations were 0.225 ± 0.179, 0.219 ± 0.168, and 0.242 ± 0.206 D, respectively. The Friedman test showed no statistically significant differences among the three groups. The device-optimized LFs were 2.248-2.289 (T-AL), 2.236-2.246 (AR-B), and 2.07-2.08 (OA-B); the corresponding zero-optimized LFs were 2.262-2.287 (T-AL), 2.287-2.303 (AR-B), and 2.160-2.170 (OA-B). There were no significant differences in prediction accuracy among the formulas. However, the accuracy of LF optimization varied by device, with T-AL being closest to the value under zero optimization. This suggests that T-AL is clinically useful for predicting an accurate postoperative refraction without zero optimization.

摘要

本研究旨在验证一种新的计算公式——巴雷特真实眼轴长度公式(T-AL)以及优化的晶状体系数(LF)在预测白内障手术后屈光状态方面的准确性。我们纳入了2022年1月至2023年6月期间在我们诊所接受使用Clareon单焦点人工晶状体白内障手术的156名日本患者。术后等效球镜度通过术后1个月获得的主观验光值计算得出。对晶状体系数进行优化,使每个计算公式的平均预测误差(PE)为零(零优化)。我们计算平均绝对预测误差(MAE)以评估准确性,并使用弗里德曼检验进行统计学比较。将T-AL和优化后的晶状体系数的准确性与用于ARGOS的传统巴雷特通用II公式(AR-B)和OA-2000(OA-B)且具有等效折射率的准确性进行比较。对于T-AL、AR-B和OA-B,MAE±标准差分别为0.225±0.179、0.219±0.168和0.242±0.206 D。弗里德曼检验显示三组之间无统计学显著差异。设备优化后的晶状体系数分别为2.248 - 2.289(T-AL)、2.236 - 2.246(AR-B)和2.07 - 2.08(OA-B);相应的零优化晶状体系数分别为2.262 - 2.287(T-AL)、2.287 - 2.303(AR-B)和2.160 - 2.170(OA-B)。各公式在预测准确性方面无显著差异。然而,晶状体系数优化的准确性因设备而异,T-AL最接近零优化下的值。这表明T-AL在临床上无需零优化即可用于准确预测术后屈光状态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71af/11354565/cc2f1d43f0b3/jcm-13-04639-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71af/11354565/57e902b339a3/jcm-13-04639-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71af/11354565/c07e13a55628/jcm-13-04639-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71af/11354565/cc2f1d43f0b3/jcm-13-04639-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71af/11354565/57e902b339a3/jcm-13-04639-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71af/11354565/c07e13a55628/jcm-13-04639-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71af/11354565/cc2f1d43f0b3/jcm-13-04639-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy Validation of the New Barrett True Axial Length Formula and the Optimized Lens Factor Using Sum-of-Segment Biometry.使用分段生物测量法对新型巴雷特真实眼轴长度公式和优化镜片系数进行准确性验证。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 8;13(16):4639. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164639.
2
Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas in cataract patients with steep corneal curvature.在角膜曲率陡峭的白内障患者中,人工晶状体计算公式的准确性。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 20;15(11):e0241630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241630. eCollection 2020.
3
[The analysis of refractive error of long axial high myopic eyes after IOL implantation].[人工晶状体植入术后长轴高度近视眼屈光不正的分析]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Apr;51(4):276-81.
4
[Alternative method of intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length].[短眼轴眼内人工晶状体屈光力计算的替代方法]
Vestn Oftalmol. 2022;138(3):24-28. doi: 10.17116/oftalma202213803124.
5
Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by intraocular lens power calculation formulas in high myopia.高度近视患者的眼内晶状体屈光力计算公式预测准确性。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;67(4):484-489. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_937_18.
6
[Comparison of the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas based on the new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry].[基于新型扫频源光学相干断层扫描生物测量法的人工晶状体屈光力计算公式准确性比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 11;57(7):502-511. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200729-00511.
7
[Comparison of formulas for intraocular lens power calculation after corneal refractive surgery].[角膜屈光手术后人工晶状体屈光力计算公式的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 11;59(12):1012-1018. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20231015-00143.
8
Accuracy of a universal theoretical formula for power calculation in pediatric intraocular lens implantation.一种通用理论公式在小儿人工晶状体植入术中计算准确性的研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 May 1;47(5):599-605. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000495.
9
Accuracy of refractive outcomes using standard or total keratometry for intraocular lens power formulas in conventional cataract surgery.在常规白内障手术中,使用标准或总角膜曲率计进行眼内透镜屈光力公式的准确性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 7;23(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03094-x.
10
[Evaluation of the accuracy of modern intraocular lens calculation formulas when optical biometry is not possible].[在无法进行光学生物测量时现代人工晶状体计算公式准确性的评估]
Vestn Oftalmol. 2024;140(2):34-39. doi: 10.17116/oftalma202414002134.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a Simple and Accurate Method for Intraocular Lens Constant Optimization Using Linear Interpolation.使用线性插值法评估一种简单准确的人工晶状体常数优化方法。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 26;14(13):4543. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134543.
2
Evaluation of Sum of Segments Biometry in Modern Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Long Eyes.长眼现代人工晶状体屈光度计算公式中节段生物测量总和的评估
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 8;19:785-793. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S511337. eCollection 2025.
3
Studying the added effect of sum-of-segments biometry to modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for short eyes.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of new intraocular lens power calculation formula for short and long eyes using segmental refractive indices.应用分段折射率的短眼和长眼新人工晶状体计算公式的准确性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Aug 1;50(8):810-815. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001466.
2
The effect of corneal power on the accuracy of 14 IOL power formulas.角膜曲率对 14 种 IOL 屈光力计算公式准确性的影响。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03395-9.
3
Refractive Predictability of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer in Long and Short Eyes Implanted with Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.
研究节段总和生物测量法对短眼现代人工晶状体屈光度计算公式的附加作用。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 12;25(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03896-1.
4
Refractive accuracy of the new Barrett formula using segmented axial length compared with that of the traditional Barrett Universal II formula.使用分段眼轴长度的新型巴雷特公式与传统巴雷特通用II公式的屈光准确性比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Jan 21;51(4):294-9. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001609.
扫频源光学相干断层扫描生物测量仪在植入扩展焦深人工晶状体的长眼和短眼中的屈光预测性
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 21;17:3525-3530. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S430535. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparing the Accuracy of the Kane, Barrett Universal II, Hill-Radial Basis Function, Emmetropia Verifying Optical, and Ladas Super Formula Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas.比较凯恩公式、巴雷特通用II公式、希尔-径向基函数公式、正视化验证光学公式和拉达斯超级公式的人工晶状体屈光力计算公式的准确性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep 7;17:2643-2652. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S417865. eCollection 2023.
5
Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas-A Systematic Review.人工晶状体屈光度计算公式——系统评价
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Dec;12(6):2881-2902. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00799-6. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
6
Comparing Predictive Accuracy of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer.比较扫频源光学相干断层扫描生物测量仪和光学低相干反射测量生物测量仪的预测准确性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul 25;17:2125-2131. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S421504. eCollection 2023.
7
Refractive Predictability and Biometry Agreement of a Combined Swept Source Optical Coherence and Reflectometry Biometer Compared to an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer.与光学低相干反射仪和扫频光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)生物测量仪相比,联合扫频源光学相干与反射测量生物测量仪的屈光预测性和生物测量一致性
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 May 22;17:1439-1452. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S408685. eCollection 2023.
8
A formula to improve the reliability of optical axial length measurement in IOL power calculation.一种提高 IOL 屈光力计算中光学轴向长度测量可靠性的公式。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 7;12(1):18845. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23665-0.
9
Evaluation of Refractive Accuracy of ORA and the Factors Impacting Residual Astigmatism in Patients Implanted with Trifocal IOLs During Cataract Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study.白内障手术中植入三焦点人工晶状体患者ORA屈光准确性及影响残余散光因素的评估:一项回顾性观察研究
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 10;16:2491-2503. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S371555. eCollection 2022.
10
Accuracy of newer intraocular lens power formulas in short and long eyes using sum-of-segments biometry.基于节段和总和的生物测量法评估短眼和长眼的新型人工晶状体计算公式的准确性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Oct 1;48(10):1113-1120. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000958. Epub 2022 Apr 27.