Raich Siddharth, Johansen Christopher, Bhandari Neeraj, Batra Kavita, Sharma Manoj
Department of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA.
Department of Healthcare Administration and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 10;12(16):1595. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161595.
There is a large disparity in Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) utilization among communities of color compared to White Americans. There is also a lack of theory-based survey instruments to measure the underlying reasons for the disparity among communities of color. The purpose of this study was to create an instrument based on a qualitative approach involving community interviews. Semi-structured interviews guided by the Multi-theory Model (MTM) of health behavior change were performed in a sample of 12 members from communities of color. The analysis entailed a directed content analysis along the themes of MTM constructs to develop a survey instrument. The barriers to PrEP that emerged included the cost of PrEP, lack of protection from other sexually transmitted diseases, reduced trust between partners, and the stigma associated with PrEP. The perceived disadvantages included the potential cost of PrEP, partner mistrust when taking PrEP, discussion of sexual behaviors with a provider, and unclear process of acquiring the PrEP prescription. The results guided the development of a survey tool to further investigate aspects of cost, partner relations, stigma, reassurance of safety, and other factors. The tool can be used for future studies as part of guided interventions to increase PrEP uptake.
与美国白人相比,有色人种社区在暴露前预防(PrEP)的使用方面存在很大差距。此外,缺乏基于理论的调查工具来衡量有色人种社区之间存在差距的潜在原因。本研究的目的是基于一种涉及社区访谈的定性方法创建一种工具。在来自有色人种社区的12名成员样本中,进行了以健康行为改变的多理论模型(MTM)为指导的半结构化访谈。分析涉及沿着MTM结构的主题进行定向内容分析,以开发一种调查工具。出现的PrEP障碍包括PrEP的成本、缺乏对其他性传播疾病的防护、伴侣之间信任度降低以及与PrEP相关的污名。感知到的不利因素包括PrEP的潜在成本、服用PrEP时伴侣的不信任、与提供者讨论性行为以及获取PrEP处方的过程不明确。这些结果指导了一种调查工具的开发,以进一步调查成本、伴侣关系、污名、安全保证和其他因素等方面。该工具可作为增加PrEP使用的指导干预措施的一部分,用于未来的研究。