Wu Jiaxuan, Li Ruicen, Gan Jiadi, Zheng Qian, Wang Guoqing, Tao Wenjuan, Yang Ming, Li Wenyu, Ji Guiyi, Li Weimin
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Thorac Cancer. 2024 Oct;15(28):2061-2072. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15428. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
With the rapid increase of chest computed tomography (CT) images, the workload faced by radiologists has increased dramatically. It is undeniable that the use of artificial intelligence (AI) image-assisted diagnosis system in clinical treatment is a major trend in medical development. Therefore, in order to explore the value and diagnostic accuracy of the current AI system in clinical application, we aim to compare the detection and differentiation of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules between AI system and physicians, so as to provide a theoretical basis for clinical application.
Our study encompassed a cohort of 23 336 patients who underwent chest low-dose spiral CT screening for lung cancer at the Health Management Center of West China Hospital. We conducted a comparative analysis between AI-assisted reading and manual interpretation, focusing on the detection and differentiation of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.
The AI-assisted reading exhibited a significantly higher screening positive rate and probability of diagnosing malignant pulmonary nodules compared with manual interpretation (p < 0.001). Moreover, AI scanning demonstrated a markedly superior detection rate of malignant pulmonary nodules compared with manual scanning (97.2% vs. 86.4%, p < 0.001). Additionally, the lung cancer detection rate was substantially higher in the AI reading group compared with the manual reading group (98.9% vs. 90.3%, p < 0.001).
Our findings underscore the superior screening positive rate and lung cancer detection rate achieved through AI-assisted reading compared with manual interpretation. Thus, AI exhibits considerable potential as an adjunctive tool in lung cancer screening within clinical practice settings.
随着胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)图像的迅速增加,放射科医生面临的工作量急剧上升。不可否认,人工智能(AI)图像辅助诊断系统在临床治疗中的应用是医学发展的一大趋势。因此,为了探索当前AI系统在临床应用中的价值和诊断准确性,我们旨在比较AI系统与医生在良性和恶性肺结节的检测与鉴别方面的表现,从而为临床应用提供理论依据。
我们的研究纳入了23336例在华西医院健康管理中心接受胸部低剂量螺旋CT肺癌筛查的患者队列。我们对AI辅助阅片和人工解读进行了对比分析,重点关注良性和恶性肺结节的检测与鉴别。
与人工解读相比,AI辅助阅片在筛查阳性率和诊断恶性肺结节的概率方面显著更高(p < 0.001)。此外,与人工扫描相比,AI扫描在恶性肺结节的检测率方面明显更优(97.2%对86.4%,p < 0.001)。另外,AI阅片组的肺癌检测率显著高于人工阅片组(98.9%对90.3%,p < 0.001)。
我们的研究结果强调了与人工解读相比,AI辅助阅片在筛查阳性率和肺癌检测率方面的优势。因此,在临床实践中,AI作为肺癌筛查的辅助工具具有相当大的潜力。