• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日常手机使用场景的情感评价与暴露感知

Affective evaluation and exposure perception of everyday mobile phone usage situations.

作者信息

Link Sarah C, Eggeling Marie, Abacioglu Ferdinand, Boehmert Christoph

机构信息

Department for Social Sciences, IU International University of Applied Sciences, Erfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2024 Sep 1;45(5):996-1008. doi: 10.1111/risa.17641.

DOI:10.1111/risa.17641
PMID:39218794
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12087716/
Abstract

To understand citizens' reactions to the 5G rollout, their affective reaction and perception of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) exposure are of interest. Although precursor studies on 2G-4G have investigated exposure perception mostly quantitatively, the present study applied a qualitative exploratory approach. A number of 35 individual interviews and 6 focus groups with the same participants were conducted in December 2022. Participants were recruited from several locations in Germany, where 5G rollout was at different stages. Interactive tasks, particularly an affective evaluation task and a ranking task, encouraged participants to consider their affect regarding mobile communications and their exposure perception. This approach allowed the participants to first engage with the topic of mobile communications/5G in an intuitive way, before talking about their specific beliefs on RF-EMF exposure. Several pictures showing a person (1) interacting with a mobile phone, (2) surrounded by other peoples' mobile phones, or (3) in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations (antennas) were used as stimulus materials. Data were analyzed using an exploratory content analysis. In the affective evaluation task participants revealed more negative associations with base stations than with mobile phones. The analysis showed that the reasons for their evaluation were very diverse, whereby exposure to RF-EMF only played a subordinate role. Further, the ranking task indicated that most participants (n = 20) felt more exposed from base stations than from mobile devices. Results are mostly in-line with the literature on 2G-4G and do not indicate a substantially different exposure perception for 5G.

摘要

为了解市民对5G网络推出的反应,他们对射频电磁场(RF-EMF)暴露的情感反应和认知备受关注。尽管之前关于2G-4G的研究大多对暴露认知进行了定量调查,但本研究采用了定性探索方法。2022年12月,对35名参与者进行了个人访谈,并组织了6个焦点小组,参与者相同。参与者从德国的几个地方招募,这些地方的5G网络推出处于不同阶段。互动任务,特别是情感评估任务和排序任务,鼓励参与者思考他们对移动通信的感受以及他们的暴露认知。这种方法让参与者在谈论他们对RF-EMF暴露的具体看法之前,首先以直观的方式接触移动通信/5G这个话题。使用了几张图片作为刺激材料,图片展示了一个人(1)与手机互动,(2)被其他人的手机包围,或(3)在手机基站(天线)附近。采用探索性内容分析法对数据进行分析。在情感评估任务中,参与者对基站表现出的负面联想比对手机更多。分析表明,他们做出评估的原因非常多样,其中RF-EMF暴露仅起次要作用。此外,排序任务表明,大多数参与者(n = 20)感觉来自基站的暴露比来自移动设备的暴露更大。研究结果大多与关于2G-4G的文献一致,并未表明对5G的暴露认知有显著不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbec/12087716/02d745dddaa2/RISA-45-996-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbec/12087716/475d47c98e3a/RISA-45-996-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbec/12087716/19d8e435ffa4/RISA-45-996-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbec/12087716/02d745dddaa2/RISA-45-996-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbec/12087716/475d47c98e3a/RISA-45-996-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbec/12087716/19d8e435ffa4/RISA-45-996-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbec/12087716/02d745dddaa2/RISA-45-996-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Affective evaluation and exposure perception of everyday mobile phone usage situations.日常手机使用场景的情感评价与暴露感知
Risk Anal. 2024 Sep 1;45(5):996-1008. doi: 10.1111/risa.17641.
2
Determining the relationship between mobile phone network signal strength and radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure: protocol and pilot study to derive conversion functions.确定移动电话网络信号强度与射频电磁场暴露之间的关系:推导转换函数的方案与初步研究
Open Res Eur. 2025 Mar 31;4:206. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18285.2. eCollection 2024.
3
The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk in the general and working population: A systematic review of human observational studies - Part II: Less researched outcomes.射频场暴露对一般人群和职业人群癌症风险的影响:人类观察性研究的系统综述——第二部分:研究较少的结果。
Environ Int. 2025 Feb;196:109274. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109274. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
4
The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk in the general and working population: A systematic review of human observational studies - Part I: Most researched outcomes.射频场暴露对一般人群和职业人群癌症风险的影响:人类观察性研究的系统评价 - 第 I 部分:研究最多的结果。
Environ Int. 2024 Sep;191:108983. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108983. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
5
Does personal relevance moderate communication effects? The example of risk communication about 5G-related electromagnetic fields.个人关联性会调节沟通效果吗?以5G相关电磁场的风险沟通为例。
Open Res Eur. 2025 May 23;5:13. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19236.2. eCollection 2025.
6
Personal RF-EMF exposure from mobile phone base stations during temporary events.个人在临时事件中来自移动电话基站的射频电磁辐射暴露。
Environ Res. 2019 Aug;175:266-273. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.033. Epub 2019 May 21.
7
Validity of at home model predictions as a proxy for personal exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations.家庭模型预测作为移动电话基站射频电磁场个人暴露的替代指标的有效性。
Environ Res. 2015 Oct;142:221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.029. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
8
Characterisation of personal exposure to environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in Albacete (Spain) and assessment of risk perception.在西班牙阿尔瓦塞特进行的环境射频电磁场个人暴露特征描述及风险感知评估。
Environ Res. 2019 May;172:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Analysis of the Association of Mobile Phone Usage and Hearing Function in Young Adults.年轻人手机使用与听力功能的关联分析
Cureus. 2025 Feb 21;17(2):e79403. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79403. eCollection 2025 Feb.
10
Protocol for personal RF-EMF exposure measurement studies in 5th generation telecommunication networks.第五代移动通信网络个人射频电磁场暴露测量研究方案。
Environ Health. 2021 Apr 1;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00719-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Does personal relevance moderate communication effects? The example of risk communication about 5G-related electromagnetic fields.个人关联性会调节沟通效果吗?以5G相关电磁场的风险沟通为例。
Open Res Eur. 2025 May 23;5:13. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19236.2. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological Drivers of Individual Differences in Risk Perception: A Systematic Case Study Focusing on 5G.个体风险感知差异的心理驱动因素:以 5G 为重点的系统案例研究。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Oct;32(10):1592-1604. doi: 10.1177/0956797621998312. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
2
5G mobile networks and health-a state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz.5G 移动网络与健康——高于 6GHz 的极低频射频场的研究现状综述。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;31(4):585-605. doi: 10.1038/s41370-021-00297-6. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
3
A Yardstick for Danger: Developing a Flexible and Sensitive Measure of Risk Perception.
危险的标尺:开发一种灵活且敏感的风险感知衡量标准。
Risk Anal. 2021 Nov;41(11):2031-2045. doi: 10.1111/risa.13704. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
4
Factors Affecting Risk Perception of Electromagnetic Waves From 5G Network Base Stations.影响 5G 网络基站电磁波风险感知的因素
Bioelectromagnetics. 2020 Oct;41(7):491-499. doi: 10.1002/bem.22290. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
5
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a critical review of explanatory hypotheses.电磁超敏反应:解释性假说的批判性回顾。
Environ Health. 2020 May 6;19(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12940-020-00602-0.
6
Developing a Broadly Applicable Measure of Risk Perception.开发一种广泛适用的风险感知衡量标准。
Risk Anal. 2019 Apr;39(4):777-791. doi: 10.1111/risa.13207. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
7
RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?再谈射频电磁场风险认知:关注担忧对于风险认知研究是否足够?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 8;14(6):620. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060620.
8
Exposure Perception as a Key Indicator of Risk Perception and Acceptance of Sources of Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields.暴露感知作为射频电磁场源风险感知与接受度的关键指标。
J Environ Public Health. 2015;2015:198272. doi: 10.1155/2015/198272. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
9
Exposure Knowledge and Risk Perception of RF EMF.射频电磁场辐射知识与风险感知
Front Public Health. 2015 Jan 13;2:289. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00289. eCollection 2014.
10
ICNIRP statement on the "Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)".国际非电离辐射防护委员会关于“限制时变电场、磁场和电磁场(高达300吉赫兹)暴露的指南”的声明
Health Phys. 2009 Sep;97(3):257-8. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181aff9db.