• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期瞬态细菌黏附于生物活性玻璃和玻璃陶瓷的定量研究:原子力显微镜观察。

Quantitative study of early-stage transient bacterial adhesion to bioactive glass and glass ceramics: atomic force microscopic observations.

机构信息

School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.

Department of Material Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, UP, 208016, India.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20336. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67716-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-67716-0
PMID:39223136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11369109/
Abstract

Antimicrobial potential of bioactive glass (BAG) makes it promising for implant applications, specifically overcoming the toxicity concerns associated with traditional antibacterial nanoparticles. The 58S composition of BAG (with high Ca and absence of Na) has been known to exhibit excellent bioactivity and antibacterial behaviour, but the mechanisms behind have not been investigated in detail. In this pioneering study, we are using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) to gain insights into 58S BAG's adhesive interactions with planktonic cells of both gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative (Escherichia coli) bacteria; along with the impact of crystallinity on antibacterial properties. We have recorded greater bacterial inhibition by amorphous BAG compared to semi-crystalline glass-ceramics and stronger effect against gram-negative bacteria via conventional long-term antibacterial tests. AFM force distance curves has illustrated substantial bonding between bacteria and BAG within the initial one second (observed at a gap of 250 ms) of contact, with multiple binding events. Further, stronger adhesion of BAG with E.coli (~ 6 nN) compared to S. aureus (~ 3 nN) has been found which can be attributed to more adhesive nano-domains (size effect) distributed uniformly on E.coli surface. This study has revealed direct evidence of impact of contact time and 58S BAG's crystalline phase on bacterial adhesion and antimicrobial behaviour. Current study has successfully demonstrated the mode and mechanisms of initial bacterial adhesion with 58S BAG. The outcome can pave the way towards improving the designing of implant surfaces for a range of biomedical applications.

摘要

生物活性玻璃(BAG)的抗菌潜力使其在植入物应用中具有广阔的前景,特别是克服了传统抗菌纳米粒子的毒性问题。BAG 的 58S 成分(高钙且无钠)已被证明具有出色的生物活性和抗菌性能,但背后的机制尚未详细研究。在这项开创性的研究中,我们使用原子力显微镜(AFM)深入了解 58S BAG 与浮游菌(包括革兰氏阳性菌(金黄色葡萄球菌)和革兰氏阴性菌(大肠杆菌))的粘性相互作用;以及结晶度对抗菌性能的影响。我们记录到与半晶态玻璃陶瓷相比,无定形 BAG 对细菌的抑制作用更强,通过传统的长期抗菌测试,对革兰氏阴性菌的抑制作用更强。AFM 力距曲线说明了在接触的最初一秒内(在 250 毫秒的间隙处观察到),细菌与 BAG 之间存在大量结合,存在多次结合事件。此外,还发现 BAG 与大肠杆菌的粘附力(6 nN)比金黄色葡萄球菌(3 nN)更强,这可以归因于大肠杆菌表面均匀分布的更多粘附纳米域(尺寸效应)。本研究揭示了接触时间和 58S BAG 的结晶相对细菌粘附和抗菌行为的直接影响。目前的研究成功地证明了与 58S BAG 初始细菌粘附的模式和机制。研究结果可以为一系列生物医学应用的植入物表面设计提供改进的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/c22fca0654a0/41598_2024_67716_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/ac2e0af279c5/41598_2024_67716_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/2f4f05f7853d/41598_2024_67716_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/698b9dfbc1bf/41598_2024_67716_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/3af3b9625319/41598_2024_67716_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/7c7a51e23d54/41598_2024_67716_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/3f268598545c/41598_2024_67716_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/c22fca0654a0/41598_2024_67716_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/ac2e0af279c5/41598_2024_67716_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/2f4f05f7853d/41598_2024_67716_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/698b9dfbc1bf/41598_2024_67716_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/3af3b9625319/41598_2024_67716_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/7c7a51e23d54/41598_2024_67716_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/3f268598545c/41598_2024_67716_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3d/11369109/c22fca0654a0/41598_2024_67716_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantitative study of early-stage transient bacterial adhesion to bioactive glass and glass ceramics: atomic force microscopic observations.早期瞬态细菌黏附于生物活性玻璃和玻璃陶瓷的定量研究:原子力显微镜观察。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20336. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67716-0.
2
Study on antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass.45S5生物活性玻璃抗菌效果的研究
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009 Jan;20(1):281-6. doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3564-5. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
3
The effect of adhesive ligands on bacterial and fibroblast adhesions to surfaces.黏附配体对细菌和成纤维细胞黏附于表面的影响。
Biomaterials. 2009 Jan;30(3):317-26. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.049. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
4
In vitro bioactivity, mechanical behavior and antibacterial properties of mesoporous SiO-CaO-NaO-PO nano bioactive glass ceramics.介孔 SiO-CaO-NaO-PO 纳米生物活性玻璃陶瓷的体外生物活性、力学性能和抗菌性能。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Dec;100:103379. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103379. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
Differential MS2 Interaction with Food Contact Surfaces Determined by Atomic Force Microscopy and Virus Recovery.通过原子力显微镜和病毒回收测定MS2与食品接触表面的差异相互作用
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Dec 1;83(24). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01881-17. Print 2017 Dec 15.
6
Analysis of bacterial adhesion using a gradient force analysis method and colloid probe atomic force microscopy.使用梯度力分析方法和胶体探针原子力显微镜对细菌黏附进行分析。
Langmuir. 2004 Sep 28;20(20):8817-22. doi: 10.1021/la0488203.
7
A comparative study on the in vitro formation of hydroxyapatite, cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of 58S bioactive glass substituted by Li and Sr.Li 和 Sr 取代的 58S 生物活性玻璃的体外羟基磷灰石形成、细胞毒性和抗菌活性的比较研究
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 Oct 1;91:349-360. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.05.058. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
Bone reconstruction: Au nanocomposite bioglasses with antibacterial properties.骨重建:具有抗菌性能的金纳米复合生物玻璃
Int J Artif Organs. 2011 Sep;34(9):920-8. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000059.
9
Electrophoretic Deposition of 58S Bioactive Glass- Polymer Composite Coatings on 316L Stainless Steel: An Optimization for Corrosion, Bioactivity, and Cytocompatibility.58S 生物活性玻璃-聚合物复合涂层在 316L 不锈钢上的电泳沉积:对腐蚀、生物活性和细胞相容性的优化。
ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2024 May 20;7(5):2966-2981. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.4c00037. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
10
Cu-Releasing Bioactive Glass Coatings and Their in Vitro Properties.Cu 释放生物活性玻璃涂层及其体外性能。
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019 Feb 13;11(6):5812-5820. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b19082. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The adhesion capability of cells is heterogeneously distributed over the cell envelope.细胞的黏附能力在细胞外膜上呈不均匀分布。
Soft Matter. 2024 Jan 17;20(3):484-494. doi: 10.1039/d3sm01045g.
2
Single-cell adhesion force mapping of a highly sticky bacterium in liquid.单细胞黏附力在液体中高度黏附菌的映射
J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022 Jan 15;606(Pt 1):628-634. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.039. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
Deciphering Single-Bacterium Adhesion Behavior Modulated by Extracellular Electron Transfer.解析胞外电子传递调控的单细菌黏附行为。
Nano Lett. 2021 Jun 23;21(12):5105-5115. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01062. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
4
AFM Unravels the Unique Adhesion Properties of the Type IVc Pilus Nanomachine.原子力显微镜揭示了 IVc 型菌毛纳米机器的独特粘附特性。
Nano Lett. 2021 Apr 14;21(7):3075-3082. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00215. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
5
AFM in cellular and molecular microbiology.原子力显微镜在细胞和分子微生物学中的应用。
Cell Microbiol. 2021 Jul;23(7):e13324. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13324. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
6
Using Atomic Force Microscopy To Illuminate the Biophysical Properties of Microbes.利用原子力显微镜揭示微生物的生物物理特性。
ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2020 Jan 21;3(1):143-155. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.9b00973. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
7
Binding Strength of Gram-Positive Bacterial Adhesins.革兰氏阳性菌黏附素的结合强度
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jun 25;11:1457. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01457. eCollection 2020.
8
What makes bacterial pathogens so sticky?是什么让细菌病原体如此黏附?
Mol Microbiol. 2020 Apr;113(4):683-690. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14448. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
9
Bioinspired surface modification of orthopedic implants for bone tissue engineering.用于骨组织工程的仿生表面改性骨科植入物。
Biomaterials. 2019 Oct;219:119366. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119366. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
10
Bacterial adherence: much more than a bond.细菌黏附:远不止一种结合方式。
AIMS Microbiol. 2018 Jul 11;4(3):563-566. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.563. eCollection 2018.