Umbilical cord management in newborn resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Evidence supporting the benefits of delayed cord clamping is increasing; however, there is no clear recommendation on cord management during newborn resuscitation. This study aimed to investigate the effects of resuscitation initiated with an intact umbilical cord, hypothesizing it is a safe stabilization procedure that improves neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

Systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science from inception to March 1, 2024. Eligible articles compared neonatal outcomes in newborns receiving initial stabilization steps before and after cord clamping.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met our inclusion criteria, with six RCTs included in the quantitative analysis. No statistically significant differences were found in delivery room parameters, in-hospital mortality, or neonatal outcomes between the examined groups. However, intact cord resuscitation group showed higher SpO at 5 min after birth compared to cord clamping prior to resuscitation group (MD 6.67%, 95% CI [-1.16%, 14.50%]). There were no significant differences in early complications of prematurity (NEC ≥ stage 2: RR 2.05, 95% CI [0.34, 12.30], IVH: RR 1.25, 95% CI [0.77, 2.00]).

CONCLUSION

Intact cord management during resuscitation appears to be a safe intervention; its effect on early complications of prematurity remains unclear. Further high-quality RCTs with larger patient numbers are urgently needed.

IMPACT

Initiating resuscitation with an intact umbilical cord appears to be a safe intervention for newborns. No statistically significant differences were found in delivery room parameters, in-hospital mortality, and neonatal outcomes between the examined groups. The utilization of specialized resuscitation trolleys appears to be promising to reduce the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. Further high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes are urgently needed to refine recommendations.