Boissin Esther, Caparos Serge, Abi Hana John, Bernard Cyann, De Neys Wim
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Uris hall, 109 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.
Université Paris 8, DysCo lab, Saint-Denis, France.
Mem Cognit. 2025 Apr;53(3):995-1007. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01625-5. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
In addressing human reasoning biases, "easy-fix" attentional focus interventions have shown that we can prompt reasoners to align responses with logico-mathematical principles. The current study aimed to test the impact of such interventions on both intuitive and deliberate responses on base-rate items. Using a two-response paradigm, participants provided initial intuitive responses under time constraints and cognitive load, followed by deliberate responses. During the intervention, we used attentional focus manipulations with base-rate items that aimed to redirect participants' attention toward the "logical" base-rate cue (i.e., the logical intervention) or toward the "heuristic" descriptive cue (i.e., the heuristic intervention). The results indicate that the logical intervention led to improved alignment with logico-mathematical principles in both intuitive and deliberate responses, albeit with a modest effect size. Conversely, the heuristic intervention had no discernible impact on accuracy. This indicates that our attentional focus manipulation is more effective at getting reasoners to respect rather than to override base-rates.
在解决人类推理偏差方面,“简单修复”的注意力焦点干预措施表明,我们可以促使推理者使回答符合逻辑数学原则。当前的研究旨在测试此类干预措施对基础概率项目的直觉性和深思熟虑性回答的影响。采用双反应范式,参与者在时间限制和认知负荷下提供初始直觉性回答,随后是深思熟虑性回答。在干预过程中,我们对基础概率项目进行注意力焦点操纵,旨在将参与者的注意力重新引导至“逻辑”基础概率线索(即逻辑干预)或“启发式”描述性线索(即启发式干预)。结果表明,逻辑干预使直觉性和深思熟虑性回答在符合逻辑数学原则方面都有所改善,尽管效应量较小。相反,启发式干预对准确性没有明显影响。这表明我们的注意力焦点操纵在让推理者尊重而非忽略基础概率方面更有效。