Public Health, Societies and Belonging Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 3;19(9):e0309694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309694. eCollection 2024.
External HIV-related stigma remains pervasive, and its effect debilitating among PLHIV in South Africa, even though the country has made many advances against HIV. External HIV-related stigma impedes both HIV prevention and access to health care and reduces the quality of treatment and care received. This study examined the prevalence of and factors associated with higher levels of HIV-related stigma among youth and adults 15 years and older in South Africa. The analysis used a nationally representative population-based household survey data collected using a multistage cluster random sampling design. Exploratory factor analysis was used to calculate the primary outcome (higher and lower HIV stigma index scores above and below the mean, respectively), based on the total number of factors retained from the 10 item self-reported questions relating to attitudes and beliefs against PLHIV. Bivariate and multivariate generalised linear models with a log link and binomial distribution were fitted to estimate crude and adjusted risk ratios (ARR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for factors associated with external HIV-related stigma. Of 38 919 respondents, 49% (49.8%; 95% CI: 48.6-51.1) were categorised as having higher levels of external HIV-related stigma. Higher levels of HIV-related stigma were significantly associated with those who had secondary level education than those with no education/primary education [ARR = 1.14 (95% CI: 1.05-1.24), p = 0.002], those employed than unemployed [ARR = 1.08 (95% CI: 1.02-1.14), p = 0.006], those in rural areas than urban areas [ARR = 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07-1.23), p<0.001], those who were aware of their HIV status than not aware [ARR = 1.34 (95% CI: 1.12-1.61), p<0.001], those who were HIV positive than HIV negative [ARR = 1.09 (95% CI: 1.02-1.17), p = 0.018], and those with no correct HIV knowledge and myth rejection than their counterparts [ARR = 1.09 (95% CI: 1.03-1.15), p = 0.002]. The findings highlight the need for peer-facilitated HIV-stigma reduction interventions targeting all types of educational institutions and the strengthening of work-based interventions. The findings emphasise the prioritisation of rural informal settings/tribal areas when developing and implementing HIV stigma reduction interventions. The study suggests that stigma reduction should be considered an important component of HIV testing and awareness. Addressing public misconceptions about HIV can mitigate externalised stigma.
外部与艾滋病相关的污名仍然普遍存在,即使南非在艾滋病防治方面取得了许多进展,艾滋病毒感染者仍然深受其害。外部与艾滋病相关的污名将阻碍艾滋病的预防和获得医疗保健,并降低接受治疗和护理的质量。本研究调查了南非 15 岁及以上青年和成年人中与艾滋病相关的污名程度较高的流行情况和相关因素。该分析使用了基于人群的全国代表性家庭调查数据,这些数据是使用多阶段聚类随机抽样设计收集的。根据与艾滋病毒感染者的态度和信念有关的 10 个自我报告问题保留的总因子数,使用探索性因子分析计算主要结果(高于和低于平均值的较高和较低艾滋病毒污名指数得分)。使用双变量和多变量广义线性模型(对数链接和二项式分布),根据与外部与艾滋病相关的污名相关的因素,估计未经调整和调整后的风险比(ARR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。在 38919 名受访者中,49%(49.8%;95%CI:48.6-51.1)被归类为具有较高水平的外部与艾滋病相关的污名。与艾滋病相关的污名程度较高与以下因素显著相关:接受过中等教育而非未接受教育/小学教育的人[ARR=1.14(95%CI:1.05-1.24),p=0.002],有工作的人而非失业的人[ARR=1.08(95%CI:1.02-1.14),p=0.006],居住在农村地区的人而非城市地区的人[ARR=1.15(95%CI:1.07-1.23),p<0.001],知晓自己艾滋病毒状况的人而非不知晓的人[ARR=1.34(95%CI:1.12-1.61),p<0.001],艾滋病毒阳性的人而非艾滋病毒阴性的人[ARR=1.09(95%CI:1.02-1.17),p=0.018],以及没有正确的艾滋病毒知识和拒绝艾滋病毒神话的人而非有正确的艾滋病毒知识和拒绝艾滋病毒神话的人[ARR=1.09(95%CI:1.03-1.15),p=0.002]。研究结果强调需要针对所有类型的教育机构开展以同伴为基础的艾滋病污名减少干预,并加强基于工作的干预。研究结果强调在制定和实施艾滋病污名减少干预措施时,应优先考虑农村非正规环境/部落地区。研究表明,减少污名应被视为艾滋病检测和认识的一个重要组成部分。解决公众对艾滋病毒的误解可以减轻外部污名。