Lapham Jessica, Martinson Melissa L
University of Washington School of Social Work, 4101 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2022 May 9;18:101117. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101117. eCollection 2022 Jun.
The stigmatizing nature of the US welfare system is of particular importance not only because it has shown to deter eligible applicants from participating in public assistance programs despite facing economic hardship, but also because stigma is an important fundamental cause of health inequities. Although scholars agree stigma is shaped by individual and contextual dimensions, the role of context is often overlooked. Given the heterogeneous nature of US state welfare environments, it may be critical to consider the ways in which state policy, social and economic contexts condition the relationship between welfare stigma and health. Using a multilevel lens, this study first examined the impact of experienced and perceived welfare stigma on self-reported health among female public assistance recipients with children. Second, we assessed the moderating effect of uneven state TANF policies, income inequality, and negative public welfare attitudes in shaping these associations. Using data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study merged with state-level economic and social measures, we employed a series of multilevel logit models with random effects. Findings show experiences and perceptions of welfare stigma are significantly linked to poor health regardless of state contexts, and outcomes vary markedly by race, ethnicity and education. States with strong anti-welfare attitudes amplified the relationship between experienced welfare stigma and poor health for Black and Hispanic mothers, and state economic contexts modified the relationship between experienced welfare stigma and poor health for mothers with less than a high school education. TANF generosity had no moderating effect on health suggesting state policy environments have limited ability to protect welfare recipients against the stigmatizing effects of the US welfare system. Results have implications for explaining stigma related disparities in health within the context of U.S. welfare environments and informing policies that may be key levers for reducing health inequities.
美国福利制度的污名化性质尤为重要,这不仅是因为研究表明,尽管面临经济困难,但它仍会阻止符合条件的申请人参与公共援助计划,还因为污名是健康不平等的一个重要根本原因。尽管学者们一致认为污名是由个体和背景因素塑造的,但背景的作用往往被忽视。鉴于美国各州福利环境的异质性,考虑州政策、社会和经济背景对福利污名与健康之间关系的影响方式可能至关重要。本研究采用多层次视角,首先考察了经历的和感知到的福利污名对有子女的女性公共援助受助者自我报告健康状况的影响。其次,我们评估了各州临时援助贫困家庭计划(TANF)政策不均衡、收入不平等和负面的公共福利态度在塑造这些关联方面的调节作用。利用脆弱家庭和儿童福利研究的数据,并结合州层面的经济和社会指标,我们采用了一系列具有随机效应的多层次逻辑模型。研究结果表明,无论州背景如何,对福利污名的经历和感知都与健康状况不佳显著相关,而且结果因种族、族裔和教育程度的不同而有显著差异。对福利持强烈反对态度的州加剧了黑人与西班牙裔母亲所经历的福利污名与健康状况不佳之间的关系,而州经济背景改变了高中以下学历母亲所经历的福利污名与健康状况不佳之间的关系。TANF的慷慨程度对健康没有调节作用,这表明州政策环境在保护福利受助者免受美国福利制度污名化影响方面的能力有限。研究结果对于在美国福利环境背景下解释与污名相关的健康差异以及为可能是减少健康不平等的关键杠杆的政策提供信息具有重要意义。