• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性血流限制抗阻运动对健康成年人体感诱发电位的影响。

The impact of acute blood-flow-restriction resistance exercise on somatosensory-evoked potentials in healthy adults.

机构信息

Department of Movement Neuroscience, Faculty of Sports Science, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Exp Physiol. 2024 Nov;109(11):1869-1881. doi: 10.1113/EP091911. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1113/EP091911
PMID:39233383
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11522821/
Abstract

Blood-flow-restriction exercise (BFR) is an emerging method to stimulate hypertrophy and strength without the need for high training loads. However, the impact of BFR concerning somatosensory processing remains elusive. Here, we aimed to investigate the acute effects of BFR on somatosensory processing in healthy adults using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs). Twelve healthy adults (23.0 ± 3.2 years of age) participated in a randomized crossover experiment, consisting of three experimental conditions: application of blood-flow restriction without resistance exercise (BFR), resistance exercise for multiple sets with blood-flow restriction (BFR) and traditional resistance exercise (unilateral biceps curls) for multiple sets without BFR (EX). SEP measurements were recorded bilaterally before, during and after each condition. SEP amplitudes were largely unaffected during various occlusive conditions. Nonetheless, our findings demonstrate a significant decrease in N9 latencies for condition EX compared with BFR, specifically in the exercised limb (mean difference = -0.26 ms, SE = 0.06 ms, P = 0.002, d = -0.335). This study provides evidence on the lack of impact of BFR within the somatosensory domain, according to current guidelines. As an alternative method to traditional high-load resistance exercise, BFR might offer a considerable upside for rehabilitative settings by reducing strain on the musculoskeletal system.

摘要

血流限制训练(BFR)是一种新兴的方法,可以在不需要高训练负荷的情况下刺激肌肉肥大和力量。然而,BFR 对体感处理的影响仍不清楚。在这里,我们旨在使用体感诱发电位(SEP)研究血流限制对健康成年人体感处理的急性影响。12 名健康成年人(23.0±3.2 岁)参加了一项随机交叉实验,包括三种实验条件:不进行抗阻运动的血流限制(BFR)、多组血流限制的抗阻运动(BFR)和多组无血流限制的传统抗阻运动(单侧二头肌卷曲)(EX)。在每个条件之前、期间和之后都进行双侧 SEP 测量。在各种闭塞条件下,SEP 幅度基本不受影响。尽管如此,我们的研究结果表明,与 BFR 相比,EX 条件下 N9 潜伏期明显缩短,特别是在运动肢体(平均差异=-0.26ms,SE=0.06ms,P=0.002,d=-0.335)。根据当前指南,这项研究提供了血流限制在体感域内没有影响的证据。作为传统高负荷抗阻运动的替代方法,BFR 通过减少对肌肉骨骼系统的压力,可能为康复环境带来相当大的好处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e1/11522821/e7262049de54/EPH-109-1869-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e1/11522821/aa680de5dd63/EPH-109-1869-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e1/11522821/995bd2a29920/EPH-109-1869-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e1/11522821/165ea71c0a26/EPH-109-1869-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e1/11522821/1c793e32c1e9/EPH-109-1869-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e1/11522821/e7262049de54/EPH-109-1869-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e1/11522821/aa680de5dd63/EPH-109-1869-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e1/11522821/995bd2a29920/EPH-109-1869-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e1/11522821/165ea71c0a26/EPH-109-1869-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e1/11522821/1c793e32c1e9/EPH-109-1869-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92e1/11522821/e7262049de54/EPH-109-1869-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of acute blood-flow-restriction resistance exercise on somatosensory-evoked potentials in healthy adults.急性血流限制抗阻运动对健康成年人体感诱发电位的影响。
Exp Physiol. 2024 Nov;109(11):1869-1881. doi: 10.1113/EP091911. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Unilateral bicep curl hemodynamics: Low-pressure continuous vs high-pressure intermittent blood flow restriction.单侧二头肌弯举血流动力学:低压连续与高压间歇性血流限制
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25(6):770-7. doi: 10.1111/sms.12297. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
3
Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness and Perceived Exertion After Blood Flow Restriction Exercise.血流限制训练后的延迟性肌肉酸痛和主观用力感觉
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Nov;31(11):3101-3108. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001779.
4
Acute Neuromuscular Adaptations in Response to Low-Intensity Blood-Flow Restricted Exercise and High-Intensity Resistance Exercise: Are There Any Differences?低强度血流限制运动和高强度抗阻运动对急性神经肌肉适应的影响:有何不同?
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Apr;32(4):902-910. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002022.
5
Impact of blood flow restriction cuff design on upper body exercise: A randomized crossover trial in resistance-trained adults.血流限制袖带设计对上半身运动的影响:一项针对阻力训练成年人的随机交叉试验。
Physiol Rep. 2025 Apr;13(7):e70303. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70303.
6
Low-load Resistance Exercise with Perceptually Primed Practical Blood Flow Restriction Induces Similar Motor Performance Fatigue, Physiological Changes, and Perceptual Responses Compared to Traditional Blood Flow Restriction in Males and Females.低负荷抗阻运动结合知觉预充血实感血流限制与传统血流限制在男性和女性中引起相似的运动表现疲劳、生理变化和知觉反应。
J Sports Sci Med. 2024 Jun 1;23(2):326-341. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2024.326. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Acute Muscular Responses to Practical Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Exercise Versus Traditional Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction and High-/Low-Load Exercise.实用型低负荷血流限制训练与传统低负荷血流限制训练和高低负荷训练对肌肉的急性反应。
J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Dec 9;29(7):984-992. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0217. Print 2020 Sep 1.
8
Blood flow restriction does not alter the early hypertrophic signaling and short-term adaptive response to resistance exercise when performed to task failure.血流限制不会改变向心收缩运动至力竭时早期的肥厚信号和短期的适应性反应。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2023 May 1;134(5):1265-1277. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00529.2022. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
9
Distinct adaptations of muscle endurance but not strength or hypertrophy to low-load resistance training with and without blood flow restriction.低负荷抗阻训练联合或不联合血流限制对肌肉耐力的适应具有独特性,但对力量和肥大无影响。
Exp Physiol. 2024 Jun;109(6):926-938. doi: 10.1113/EP091310. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
10
Microvascular Reactivity Is Greater Following Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise Compared with Traditional Resistance Exercise.与传统抗阻运动相比,血流限制抗阻运动后微血管反应性更强。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Oct 1;38(10):e553-e562. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004873. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
A Useful Blood Flow Restriction Training Risk Stratification for Exercise and Rehabilitation.一种用于运动和康复的有用的血流限制训练风险分层
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 11;13:808622. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.808622. eCollection 2022.
2
Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials as a Marker of Functional Neuroplasticity in Athletes: A Systematic Review.体感诱发电位作为运动员功能性神经可塑性的标志物:一项系统综述
Front Physiol. 2022 Jan 17;12:821605. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.821605. eCollection 2021.
3
Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction Compared to Traditional Resistance Training on Strength and Muscle Mass in Non-Active Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
血流限制阻力训练与传统阻力训练对非活跃老年成年人的力量和肌肉质量的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 30;18(21):11441. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111441.
4
EFFECT OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION TRAINING ON MUSCULAR PERFORMANCE, PAIN AND VASCULAR FUNCTION.血流限制训练对肌肉性能、疼痛和血管功能的影响
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Dec;15(6):892-900. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20200892.
5
Acute Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment.有氧运动对轻度认知障碍患者体感诱发电位的急性影响。
Brain Sci. 2020 Sep 23;10(10):663. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100663.
6
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Neural Adaptations Following Blood Flow Restriction Training: What We Know and What We Don't Know.血流限制训练后神经适应性的系统评价与荟萃分析:我们所知与未知
Front Physiol. 2020 Aug 4;11:887. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00887. eCollection 2020.
7
Nerve conduction during acute blood-flow restriction with and without low-intensity exercise Nerve conduction and blood-flow restriction.急性血流限制时有无低强度运动的神经传导 神经传导和血流限制。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 30;10(1):7380. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64379-5.
8
Blood Flow Restricted Exercise and Discomfort: A Review.血流限制训练与不适:综述
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Mar 1;36(3):871-879. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003525.
9
Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety.血流限制训练:方法学、应用及安全性考量
Front Physiol. 2019 May 15;10:533. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00533. eCollection 2019.
10
Modified ischaemic nerve block of the forearm: use for the induction of cortical plasticity in distal hand muscles.改良缺血性神经阻滞前臂:用于诱导手部远侧肌肉皮质可塑性。
J Physiol. 2019 Jul;597(13):3457-3471. doi: 10.1113/JP277639. Epub 2019 Jun 6.