Bokhorst David, Schoeller Magnus G
European University Institute, San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy.
Centre for European Integration Research (EIF), Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
J Eur Public Policy. 2024 Mar 24;31(10):3275-3298. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2024.2332697. eCollection 2024.
The management of the COVID-19 crisis and, in particular, the Next Generation EU fund have shown that European leaders can find integrationist policy solutions despite increasing politicisation at home where democratic constraints may lead to a feared 'multilevel politics trap'. Therefore, we ask whether and how national governments can manage such constraints and thus spring or avoid the trap. Theoretically, we argue that the agency of governments is a crucial factor for understanding the varying dynamics of politicisation in regional integration, as governments can raise or lower domestic audience costs by strategically interacting with their parliament or media. Empirically, we probe the plausibility of our theoretical propositions by examining constraint management and position-taking in Austria and the Netherlands in the context of European fiscal solidarity. Our results show that there is no inevitably self-reinforcing multilevel politics trap but that the effects of domestic constraint are, to a considerable extent, contingent on the agency of national governments.
新冠疫情危机的管理,尤其是“下一代欧盟”基金,表明欧洲领导人能够找到一体化政策解决方案,尽管国内政治化程度不断提高,而民主限制可能导致令人担忧的“多层次政治陷阱”。因此,我们要问各国政府能否以及如何应对这些限制,从而跳出或避免这个陷阱。从理论上讲,我们认为政府的能动性是理解区域一体化中政治化动态变化的关键因素,因为政府可以通过与议会或媒体进行战略互动来提高或降低国内受众成本。从实证角度看,我们通过考察奥地利和荷兰在欧洲财政团结背景下的限制管理和立场采取情况,来探究我们理论命题的合理性。我们的结果表明,不存在必然自我强化的多层次政治陷阱,而是国内限制的影响在很大程度上取决于各国政府的能动性。