• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症研究方法:使用具有成本效益的活死染色方案通过活细胞成像评估球体培养物的治疗反应。

Methods in cancer research: Assessing therapy response of spheroid cultures by life cell imaging using a cost-effective live-dead staining protocol.

作者信息

Phour Jaison, Vassella Erik

机构信息

Institute of Tissue Medicine & Pathology, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Biol Methods Protoc. 2024 Aug 22;9(1):bpae060. doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpae060. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1093/biomethods/bpae060
PMID:39234439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11374025/
Abstract

Spheroid cultures of cancer cell lines or primary cells represent a more clinically relevant model for predicting therapy response compared to two-dimensional cell culture. However, current live-dead staining protocols used for treatment response in spheroid cultures are often expensive, toxic to the cells, or limited in their ability to monitor therapy response over an extended period due to reduced stability. In our study, we have developed a cost-effective method utilizing calcein-AM and Helix NP™ Blue for live-dead staining, enabling the monitoring of therapy response of spheroid cultures for up to 10 days. Additionally, we used ICY BioImage Analysis and Z-stacks projection to calculate viability, which is a more accurate method for assessing treatment response compared to traditional methods on spheroid size. Using the example of glioblastoma cell lines and primary glioblastoma cells, we show that spheroid cultures typically exhibit a green outer layer of viable cells, a turquoise mantle of hypoxic quiescent cells, and a blue core of necrotic cells when visualized using confocal microscopy. Upon treatment of spheroids with the alkylating agent temozolomide, we observed a reduction in the viability of glioblastoma cells after an incubation period of 7 days. This method can also be adapted for monitoring therapy response in different cancer systems, offering a versatile and cost-effective approach for assessing therapy efficacy in three-dimensional culture models.

摘要

与二维细胞培养相比,癌细胞系或原代细胞的球体培养是一种更具临床相关性的预测治疗反应的模型。然而,目前用于球体培养中治疗反应的活死染色方案通常成本高昂、对细胞有毒,或者由于稳定性降低,在长时间监测治疗反应的能力方面存在局限性。在我们的研究中,我们开发了一种利用钙黄绿素-AM和Helix NP™ Blue进行活死染色的经济有效方法,能够监测球体培养长达10天的治疗反应。此外,我们使用ICY生物图像分析和Z-stack投影来计算存活率,与基于球体大小的传统方法相比,这是一种评估治疗反应更准确的方法。以胶质母细胞瘤细胞系和原发性胶质母细胞瘤细胞为例,我们发现,使用共聚焦显微镜观察时,球体培养通常显示出一层绿色的活细胞外层、一层蓝绿色的低氧静止细胞层和一个蓝色的坏死细胞核心。在用烷化剂替莫唑胺处理球体后,我们观察到胶质母细胞瘤细胞在孵育7天后存活率降低。该方法也可适用于监测不同癌症系统中的治疗反应,为评估三维培养模型中的治疗效果提供了一种通用且经济有效的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b8f/11374025/d6dc7ca77a8c/bpae060f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b8f/11374025/e8a3633f0682/bpae060f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b8f/11374025/d6dc7ca77a8c/bpae060f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b8f/11374025/e8a3633f0682/bpae060f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b8f/11374025/d6dc7ca77a8c/bpae060f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Methods in cancer research: Assessing therapy response of spheroid cultures by life cell imaging using a cost-effective live-dead staining protocol.癌症研究方法:使用具有成本效益的活死染色方案通过活细胞成像评估球体培养物的治疗反应。
Biol Methods Protoc. 2024 Aug 22;9(1):bpae060. doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpae060. eCollection 2024.
2
Does PARP Inhibition Sensitize Chondrosarcoma Cell Lines to Chemotherapy or Radiotherapy? Results From a Three-dimensional Spheroid Cell Model.PARP 抑制剂是否能使软骨肉瘤细胞系对化疗或放疗敏感?来自三维球体细胞模型的结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Mar 1;481(3):608-619. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002483. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Do Patient-derived Spheroid Culture Models Have Relevance in Chondrosarcoma Research?患者来源球体培养模型在软骨肉瘤研究中有相关性吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Mar 1;479(3):477-490. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001317.
4
Robust formation of optimal single spheroids towards cost-effective in vitro three-dimensional tumor models.稳健形成最优的单一球体以实现具有成本效益的体外三维肿瘤模型。
FEBS Open Bio. 2023 Jul;13(7):1266-1277. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13614. Epub 2023 May 5.
5
Glioblastoma spheroid growth and chemotherapeutic responses in single and dual-stiffness hydrogels.胶质母细胞瘤球体在单硬度和双硬度水凝胶中的生长和化疗反应。
Acta Biomater. 2023 Jun;163:400-414. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.05.048. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
6
High-content assays for characterizing the viability and morphology of 3D cancer spheroid cultures.用于表征3D癌症球体培养物的活力和形态的高内涵分析。
Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2015 Sep;13(7):402-14. doi: 10.1089/adt.2015.655.
7
Effects of the lysosomal destabilizing drug siramesine on glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo.溶酶体去稳定药物西拉米辛对胶质母细胞瘤的体内外作用
BMC Cancer. 2017 Mar 7;17(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3162-3.
8
Patient-derived, three-dimensional spheroid cultures provide a versatile translational model for the study of organ-confined prostate cancer.患者来源的三维球体培养为研究器官局限型前列腺癌提供了一个多功能的转化模型。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;145(3):551-559. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2803-5. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
9
Establishing an In Vitro 3D Spheroid Model to Study Medulloblastoma Drug Response and Tumor Dissemination.建立体外 3D 球体模型以研究成神经管细胞瘤的药物反应和肿瘤扩散。
Curr Protoc. 2022 Jan;2(1):e357. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.357.
10
Morphological and histological changes of glioma cells immediately after 5-aminolevulinic acid mediated photodynamic therapy.5-氨基酮戊酸介导的光动力疗法后胶质瘤细胞的形态学和组织学变化
Neurol Res. 2011 Sep;33(7):739-46. doi: 10.1179/1743132810Y.0000000001.

引用本文的文献

1
pH-responsive release of small molecule pharmaceuticals from a reworked adsorbent hydrogel for environmental applications.用于环境应用的再生吸附水凝胶对小分子药物的pH响应释放
RSC Adv. 2025 Aug 20;15(36):29462-29478. doi: 10.1039/d5ra03794h. eCollection 2025 Aug 18.
2
Protocol for the quantitative characterization of cell aggregates using an MRI setup maintaining optimal cultivation conditions.使用维持最佳培养条件的MRI装置对细胞聚集体进行定量表征的方案。
STAR Protoc. 2025 Jul 30;6(3):104002. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2025.104002.
3
Rapid and reproducible generation of glioblastoma spheroids for high-throughput drug screening.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding and targeting resistance mechanisms in cancer.了解癌症中的耐药机制并以其为靶点。
MedComm (2020). 2023 May 22;4(3):e265. doi: 10.1002/mco2.265. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Assay establishment and validation of a high-throughput organoid-based drug screening platform.建立和验证高通量类器官药物筛选平台的方法。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022 May 26;13(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-02902-3.
3
Advancements in 3D Cell Culture Systems for Personalizing Anti-Cancer Therapies.用于个性化抗癌治疗的3D细胞培养系统的进展
用于高通量药物筛选的胶质母细胞瘤球体的快速且可重复生成。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Dec 18;12:1471012. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1471012. eCollection 2024.
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 30;11:782766. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.782766. eCollection 2021.
4
Organoid and Spheroid Tumor Models: Techniques and Applications.类器官和球体肿瘤模型:技术与应用
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 19;13(4):874. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040874.
5
Critical role of three-dimensional tumorsphere size on experimental outcome.三维肿瘤球体大小对实验结果具有关键作用。
Biotechniques. 2020 Nov;69(5):333-338. doi: 10.2144/btn-2020-0081. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
6
Dexamethasone-mediated oncogenicity in vitro and in an animal model of glioblastoma.地塞米松在体外和胶质母细胞瘤动物模型中的致癌作用。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 1;129(6):1446-1455. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.JNS17668. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
High-Content Monitoring of Drug Effects in a 3D Spheroid Model.3D球体模型中药物效应的高内涵监测
Front Oncol. 2017 Dec 11;7:293. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00293. eCollection 2017.
8
Comprehensive high-throughput image analysis for therapeutic efficacy of architecturally complex heterotypic organoids.针对结构复杂的异质类器官的治疗效果进行全面高通量的图像分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 30;7(1):16645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16622-9.
9
The Different Mechanisms of Cancer Drug Resistance: A Brief Review.癌症耐药的不同机制:简要综述
Adv Pharm Bull. 2017 Sep;7(3):339-348. doi: 10.15171/apb.2017.041. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
10
Cell-based assays using calcein acetoxymethyl ester show variation in fluorescence with treatment conditions.使用钙黄绿素乙酰氧基甲酯的细胞分析显示,荧光会随处理条件而变化。
J Biol Methods. 2015;2(3). doi: 10.14440/jbm.2015.73.