Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University.
Personal Disord. 2024 Sep;15(5):304-314. doi: 10.1037/per0000682.
Our cross-sectional study provides a head-to-head comparison of Section II and Section III of , fifth edition (DSM-5) diagnostic models of personality disorders (PDs) in identifying significant personality correlates of psychiatric hospitalization (PH). PH is an indicator of a breakdown in one's existing ability to manage mental crisis. The sample was recruited from psychiatric clinical services () as well as universities and the local community (). We used the Structured Clinical Interview for PD (SCID-5-PD) for Section II diagnosis, the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS) for Criterion A and the Personality Inventory for (PID-5) for Criterion B. Separate logistic regressions analyses showed high discriminative utility for all diagnostic models: the number of Section II diagnosis, level of personality functioning, and five maladaptive traits (AUC between .89 and .97). Binomial logistic regression with a forward stepwise procedure showed that Section II number of diagnoses revealed incremental utility over Criteria A and B in distinguishing between individuals experiencing a mental health crisis requiring PH and those not requiring immediate intervention. We conclude that each diagnostic model, when considered individually, exhibits a high degree of discriminatory performance. However, employing all these models concurrently for identifying personality correlates of PH proves impractical. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
我们的横断面研究提供了一个头对头的比较, 的第五版(DSM-5)人格障碍(PD)诊断模型的第二部分和第三部分,以确定精神病住院(PH)的重要人格相关因素。PH 是一个人现有能力崩溃的指标,无法应对精神危机。该样本是从精神病临床服务机构()以及大学和当地社区()招募而来。我们使用人格障碍诊断访谈表第五版(SCID-5-PD)进行第二部分诊断,自我和人际功能量表(SIFS)用于标准 A,人格障碍检查表第五版(PID-5)用于标准 B。单独的逻辑回归分析显示,所有诊断模型都具有很高的判别效用:第二部分的诊断数量、人格功能水平和五个适应不良特征(AUC 在.89 到.97 之间)。采用逐步向前法的二项逻辑回归显示,第二部分的诊断数量在区分需要 PH 的心理健康危机和不需要立即干预的个体方面,比标准 A 和 B 具有增量效用。我们得出结论,每个诊断模型在单独考虑时,都表现出高度的判别性能。然而,同时使用所有这些模型来识别 PH 的人格相关因素是不切实际的。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。