• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Breaking the taboo of using the nursing process: lived experiences of nursing students and faculty members.打破使用护理程序的禁忌:护理专业学生和教师的亲身经历
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 5;23(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02233-z.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
4
Understanding competency of nursing students in the course of case-based learning in Cambodia: a convergent mixed method study.了解柬埔寨护理专业学生在基于案例学习过程中的能力:一项聚合混合方法研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 11;22(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01420-8.
5
Faculty's experience in developing and implementing concept-based teaching of baccalaureate nursing education in the Chinese context: A descriptive qualitative research study.在中国背景下,教师在发展和实施本科护理教育基于概念的教学方面的经验:一项描述性定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105126. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105126. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
6
Experiences of Undergraduate Medical, Nursing Students and Faculty regarding Flipped Classroom: A Mixed Method Study at Private Medical University in Pakistan.巴基斯坦私立医科大学本科医学、护理学生和教师对翻转课堂的体验:混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 19;13(4):e070276. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070276.
7
Exploring nursing faculty, managers, newly graduated nurses, and students' experiences of nursing internship program implementation in Iran: a descriptive qualitative study.探索伊朗护理教师、管理人员、新毕业护士和学生对护理实习计划实施的体验:一项描述性定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Dec 27;21(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01159-8.
8
Evaluation of an undergraduate nursing entrustable professional activities framework: An exploratory qualitative research.本科护理可委托专业活动框架评估:探索性定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Apr;87:104343. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104343. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
9
Bachelor nursing students´ and their educators´ experiences of teaching strategies targeting critical thinking: A scoping review.本科护理学生及其教育者对针对批判性思维的教学策略的体验:范围综述。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Aug;63:103409. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103409. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
10
Experienced based co design: nursing preceptorship educational programme.基于经验的协同设计:护理带教教育项目
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Sep 17;8(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00385-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Nursing practice in relation to older people's fundamentals of care in nursing homes: An exploratory design.养老院中与老年人基础护理相关的护理实践:一项探索性设计。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 May 6;8:100346. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100346. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
What makes a nurse today? A debate on the nursing professional identity and its need for change.当今的护士是什么样的?关于护理专业认同及其变革需求的辩论。
Nurs Philos. 2021 Apr;22(2):e12343. doi: 10.1111/nup.12343. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
Senior high school students' opinions on the nursing profession: A ten-year comparative study.高中生对护理专业的看法:一项十年对比研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Aug;76(8):2082-2093. doi: 10.1111/jan.14403. Epub 2020 May 25.
3
3D-printed Surgical Training Model Based on Real Patient Situations for Dental Education.基于真实患者情况的 3D 打印手术培训模型用于口腔医学教育。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;17(8):2901. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082901.
4
Contribution of the nursing process for the construction of the identity of nursing professionals.护理程序对护理专业人员身份构建的贡献。
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2019 Nov 25;41(spe):e20190143. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2020.20190143. eCollection 2020.
5
Understanding perceptions of nursing professional identity in students entering an Australian undergraduate nursing degree.理解进入澳大利亚本科护理学位的学生对护理专业身份的认知。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Sep;32:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
6
Appraising Qualitative Research for Evidence Syntheses: A Compendium of Quality Appraisal Tools.评价证据综合的定性研究:质量评价工具纲要。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Nov;28(13):2115-2131. doi: 10.1177/1049732318785358. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
7
The Importance of Holistic Care at the End of Life.临终综合护理的重要性。
Ulster Med J. 2017 May;86(2):143-144. Epub 2017 May 20.
8
Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research.在医疗保健研究中采用定性描述方法。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017 Nov 24;4:2333393617742282. doi: 10.1177/2333393617742282. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
9
Teaching evidence based practice to undergraduate nursing students.向本科护理专业学生传授循证实践
J Prof Nurs. 2017 Nov-Dec;33(6):447-451. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
10
Strategies used for the promotion of critical thinking in nursing undergraduate education: A systematic review.护理本科教育中促进批判性思维的策略:一项系统综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Oct;57:103-107. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

打破使用护理程序的禁忌:护理专业学生和教师的亲身经历

Breaking the taboo of using the nursing process: lived experiences of nursing students and faculty members.

作者信息

Shahzeydi Amir, Abazari Parvaneh, Gorji-Varnosfaderani Fatemeh, Ashouri Elaheh, Abolhassani Shahla, Sabohi Fakhri

机构信息

Pediatric Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Student of Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 5;23(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02233-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02233-z
PMID:39237916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11378630/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the numerous advantages of the nursing process, nursing students often struggle with utilizing this model. Therefore, studies suggest innovative teaching methods to address this issue. Teaching based on real clinical cases is considered a collaborative learning method that enhances students' active learning for the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills. In this method, students can acquire sufficient knowledge about patient care by accessing authentic information.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the experiences of nursing students and faculty members regarding the implementation of nursing process educational workshops, based on real case studies.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study.

PARTICIPANTS

9 Nursing students and 7 faculty members from the Isfahan School of Nursing and Midwifery who attended the workshops.

METHODS

This qualitative descriptive study was conducted from 2021 to 2023. Data was collected through semi-structured individual and focus group interviews using a qualitative content analysis approach for data analysis.

RESULTS

After analyzing the data, a theme titled "Breaking Taboos in the Nursing Process" was identified. This theme consists of four categories: "Strengthening the Cognitive Infrastructure for Accepting the Nursing Process," "Enhancing the Applicability of the Nursing Process," "Assisting in Positive Professional Identity," and "Facilitating a Self-Directed Learning Platform." Additionally, thirteen subcategories were obtained.

CONCLUSION

The data obtained from the present study showed that conducting nursing process educational workshops, where real clinical cases are discussed, analyzed, and criticized, increases critical thinking, learning motivation, and understanding of the necessity and importance of implementing the nursing process. Therefore, it is recommended that instructors utilize this innovative and effective teaching method for instructing the nursing process.

摘要

背景

尽管护理程序有诸多优点,但护理专业学生在运用该模式时常常遇到困难。因此,研究提出了创新教学方法来解决这一问题。基于真实临床案例的教学被认为是一种协作学习方法,可增强学生的主动学习,以培养批判性思维和解决问题的能力。在这种方法中,学生可以通过获取真实信息来获得足够的患者护理知识。

目的

本研究旨在调查护理专业学生和教师对基于真实案例研究开展护理程序教育工作坊的体验。

设计

一项定性描述性研究。

参与者

来自伊斯法罕护理与助产学院参加工作坊的9名护理专业学生和7名教师。

方法

这项定性描述性研究于2021年至2023年进行。通过半结构化的个人访谈和焦点小组访谈收集数据,并采用定性内容分析法进行数据分析。

结果

在分析数据后,确定了一个名为“打破护理程序中的禁忌”的主题。该主题由四个类别组成:“加强接受护理程序的认知基础”、“提高护理程序的适用性”、“辅助形成积极的职业身份认同”和“促进自主学习平台”。此外,还得到了13个子类别。

结论

本研究获得的数据表明,开展护理程序教育工作坊,在其中讨论、分析和批判真实临床案例,可提高批判性思维、学习动机,并增进对实施护理程序的必要性和重要性的理解。因此,建议教师采用这种创新且有效的教学方法来教授护理程序。