Campbell Kendall M, Figueroa Edgar, Baluchi Donna, Rodríguez José E
Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
PRiMER. 2024 Aug 5;8:42. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2024.148162. eCollection 2024.
Peer review is primarily thought of as the process used to determine whether manuscripts are published in medical or other academic journals. While a publication may be one outcome of peer review, this article shares a model of 4 Ps to remind faculty of some important additional applications of peer review. The 4 Ps are publication, presentation, promotion, and practice. The medical literature offers few reasons why faculty should get involved in peer review. In this article, we define peer review, illustrate the role of peer review in four important processes, describe how the volume of material to review has changed over time, and share how participation in these processes promotes career advancement. Understanding the peer review process and its benefits can encourage professionals to participate in peer review in any of the four Ps as they recognize the benefits to their discipline and their career.
同行评审主要被认为是用于确定稿件是否能在医学或其他学术期刊上发表的过程。虽然发表可能是同行评审的一个结果,但本文分享了一个4P模型,以提醒教职员工同行评审的一些重要的其他应用。这4P分别是发表、展示、晋升和实践。医学文献中很少有关于教职员工为何应参与同行评审的理由。在本文中,我们定义了同行评审,阐述了同行评审在四个重要过程中的作用,描述了待评审材料的数量随时间如何变化,并分享了参与这些过程如何促进职业发展。了解同行评审过程及其益处可以鼓励专业人员在认识到对其学科和职业的益处后,在4P中的任何一个方面参与同行评审。