Heinsen Robin S
Miami University Oxford, OH, USA.
J Eye Mov Res. 2024 Jul 22;17(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.17.2.3. eCollection 2024.
In a unique case-study approach in which I served as both the research participant and the experimenter, I wore eye-tracking glasses while teaching a brief music lesson to two university students learning trumpet, then approximately two weeks later, I watched a video of the lesson and tracked my gaze again. To investigate unconscious perceptual processes engaged during music teaching, I compared my attention allocation while teaching to my attention allocation during selfobservation. My gaze behavior while teaching revealed a high level of automaticity regarding lesson sequencing and allocation of attention. Strategic moment-to-moment shifts in attention between the two students occurred entirely below my conscious awareness, yet post hoc analyses revealed precisely timed changes that were related to momentary goals. While watching the video, absent the demands of behavioral interaction and momentary decision-making, I directed more sustained attention to both students than I had while teaching. These results reveal important features of "teacher thinking" that are not directly observable or typically construed as conscious behavior. That this component of teaching practice does not involve volitional control suggests that teachers' descriptions of their thinking may not reveal to novices important elements of pedagogical expertise.
在一项独特的案例研究中,我既是研究参与者又是实验者。我戴着眼动追踪眼镜给两名学习小号的大学生上了一堂简短的音乐课,大约两周后,我观看了这堂课的视频并再次追踪我的目光。为了研究音乐教学过程中发生的无意识感知过程,我将教学时的注意力分配与自我观察时的注意力分配进行了比较。我教学时的注视行为显示出在课程顺序安排和注意力分配方面具有高度的自动性。在两名学生之间瞬间进行的策略性注意力转移完全发生在我的意识层面之下,但事后分析揭示了与瞬间目标相关的精确计时变化。在观看视频时,由于没有行为互动和瞬间决策的要求,我对两名学生的注意力都比教学时更加持续。这些结果揭示了“教师思维”的重要特征,这些特征不是直接可观察到的,也通常不被视为有意识的行为。教学实践的这一组成部分不涉及意志控制,这表明教师对其思维的描述可能不会向新手揭示教学专业知识的重要元素。