Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2024 Dec;68(12):1408-1421. doi: 10.1111/jir.13185. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often present in people with intellectual disability (ID) and autism. However, few ADHD measures have been developed specifically for individuals with these conditions. There is little literature exploring how well ADHD measures are performing at picking up specific symptoms at the item level.
Analyses were conducted on data from 122 children aged 7-15 years old with diagnoses of both ADHD and ID enrolled in the Hyperactivity and Special Educational Needs trial. Parents and teachers completed ratings of ADHD symptoms on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) hyperactivity subscale and the revised Conners' Rating Scales hyperactivity scale and ADHD index. Cronbach's alpha was used to examine the reliability of these measures. Item response theory explores the performance of individual items. Multiple indicators, multiple causes models were used to test for measurement invariance by ID severity, co-occurring autism traits and child age.
The reliability of parent and teacher reports of ADHD symptoms on the Conners' and ABC was acceptable across the range of ID. Item performance was generally good, and information was provided across the continuum of ADHD traits. Few items on either measure were non-invariant (i.e., item endorsement generally did not differ based on other child characteristics). When non-invariance was found, the effect was small.
Both the parent-reported and teacher-reported versions of the Conners' hyperactivity scale and ADHD index and the ABC hyperactivity subscale appear to function well in the current sample of children with co-occurring ADHD and ID.
注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)在智障(ID)和自闭症患者中较为常见。然而,针对这些患者,开发的 ADHD 评估工具较少。目前,探讨 ADHD 评估工具在项目层面上对特定症状的评估效果的文献很少。
对参加 Hyperactivity and Special Educational Needs 试验的 122 名年龄在 7-15 岁、同时被诊断为 ADHD 和 ID 的儿童的数据进行了分析。家长和教师分别对儿童的多动症状使用异常行为检查表(ABC)多动分量表和修订后的 Conners' 评定量表多动量表及 ADHD 指数进行评分。使用克朗巴赫 α系数来评估这些测量工具的可靠性。项目反应理论探索了各个项目的表现。使用多指标、多原因模型,根据 ID 严重程度、共患自闭症特征和儿童年龄,检验测量不变性。
在 ID 范围内,父母和教师对 Conners 和 ABC 中 ADHD 症状的报告具有可接受的可靠性。项目表现普遍较好,提供了 ADHD 特征的连续体信息。两个量表上的少数项目都不具有不变性(即,基于其他儿童特征,项目的认可通常没有差异)。当发现不变性时,其影响较小。
在当前伴有 ADHD 和 ID 的儿童样本中,Conners 多动量表和 ADHD 指数的家长报告和教师报告版本以及 ABC 多动分量表似乎都能很好地发挥作用。