• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贡献分析在卫生干预评估中的应用:一项范围综述

The Use of Contribution Analysis in Evaluating Health Interventions: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Buetti David, Fitzgerald Michael, Barber Cassandra, Labelle Patrick R, Bourgeois Isabelle, Aubry Tim, Cameron Erin, Kendall Claire E

机构信息

School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Canada.

Bruyère Research Institute, Canada.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2025 Sep;48(3):363-373. doi: 10.1177/01632787241281745. Epub 2024 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1177/01632787241281745
PMID:39244661
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12274561/
Abstract

Contribution Analysis (CA) is a promising theory-based evaluation approach for complex interventions, yet its application in health interventions remains largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we conducted a scoping review to examine the extent of such applications and the methodologies, strengths, and limitations of this approach in health programming. Our comprehensive search strategy was developed and used in 15 databases to identify peer-reviewed articles from 1999 to 2023 that focused on using CA to evaluate health interventions. We then implemented rigorous double- and triple-screening processes for abstracts and full-text papers, respectively. Data were extracted and narratively summarized. Our review found seven relevant studies, which showed that CA has been employed in health promotion programs, health policies, and targeted health issues such as nutrition, cardiovascular disease, substance misuse, and suicide prevention. The studies identified strengths of using CA, including its flexible impact evaluation approach, capacity to inform decision-making, and potential to enhance understanding of health programs and policies. However, challenges such as how to determine suitable evidence levels and how to best manage resource intensity were also identified. The limited number of studies indicates that CA is still a novel approach, whereas the variation in the reporting of the studies suggests that this approach could benefit from more standardized methods and detailed stakeholder engagement strategies.

摘要

贡献分析(CA)是一种针对复杂干预措施的、基于理论的、很有前景的评估方法,但其在健康干预中的应用在很大程度上仍未得到探索。为了弥补这一差距,我们进行了一项范围综述,以研究此类应用的程度以及该方法在健康规划中的方法、优势和局限性。我们制定了全面的检索策略,并在15个数据库中使用,以识别1999年至2023年期间专注于使用CA评估健康干预措施的同行评审文章。然后,我们分别对摘要和全文论文实施了严格的双筛和三筛流程。提取数据并进行叙述性总结。我们的综述发现了七项相关研究,这些研究表明CA已被应用于健康促进项目、健康政策以及营养、心血管疾病、药物滥用和自杀预防等特定健康问题。这些研究确定了使用CA的优势,包括其灵活的影响评估方法、为决策提供信息的能力以及增强对健康项目和政策理解的潜力。然而,也发现了一些挑战,比如如何确定合适的证据水平以及如何最好地管理资源强度。研究数量有限表明CA仍是一种新方法,而研究报告的差异表明这种方法可能受益于更标准化的方法和详细的利益相关者参与策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab60/12274561/05e381b0085a/10.1177_01632787241281745-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab60/12274561/05e381b0085a/10.1177_01632787241281745-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab60/12274561/05e381b0085a/10.1177_01632787241281745-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Use of Contribution Analysis in Evaluating Health Interventions: A Scoping Review.贡献分析在卫生干预评估中的应用:一项范围综述
Eval Health Prof. 2025 Sep;48(3):363-373. doi: 10.1177/01632787241281745. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
6
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
7
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
8
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.加强针对慢性病风险因素的校本政策或实践实施的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 29;11(11):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub2.
9
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
10
The effectiveness of using non-traditional teaching methods to prepare student health care professionals for the delivery of mental state examination: a systematic review.使用非传统教学方法培养学生医护专业人员进行精神状态检查的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Aug 14;13(7):177-212. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2263.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Impacts of Community-Campus Engagement on Population Health in Ottawa and Thunder Bay, Canada: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Contribution Analysis.评估加拿大渥太华和桑德贝社区与校园合作对人口健康的影响:混合方法贡献分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 17;14:e58546. doi: 10.2196/58546.

本文引用的文献

1
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
2
Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.开展范围综述:护理学和助产学学生、临床医生、研究人员和学者的实用指南。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Apr;77(4):2102-2113. doi: 10.1111/jan.14743. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
4
Evaluating the impact of healthcare interventions using routine data.使用常规数据评估医疗保健干预措施的影响。
BMJ. 2019 Jun 20;365:l2239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2239.
5
Using the Contribution Analysis Approach to Evaluate Science Impact: A Case Study of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.运用贡献分析方法评估科学影响力:以美国国家职业安全与健康研究所为例
Am J Eval. 2019 Jun;40(2):177-189. doi: 10.1177/1098214018767046. Epub 2018 Apr 29.
6
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Randomised controlled trials - the gold standard for effectiveness research: Study design: randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验——有效性研究的金标准:研究设计:随机对照试验
BJOG. 2018 Dec;125(13):1716. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15199. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
8
L'analyse de contribution pour évaluer l'impact de la démarche ÉIS sur les processus décisionnels municipaux : un choix méthodologique intéressant ?用于评估战略环境评价程序对城市决策过程影响的贡献分析:一种有趣的方法选择?
Glob Health Promot. 2017 Jun;24(2):55-65. doi: 10.1177/1757975916677026. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审:2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
10
Conceptual decomposition of complex health care interventions for evidence synthesis: a literature review.用于证据综合的复杂医疗保健干预措施的概念分解:一项文献综述
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Oct;21(5):817-23. doi: 10.1111/jep.12384. Epub 2015 May 21.