University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT.
University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Med Care. 2024 Oct 1;62(10):639-649. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002048. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
Social risk screening during inpatient care is required in new CMS regulations, yet its impact on inpatient care and patient outcomes is unknown.
To evaluate whether implementing a social risk screening protocol improves discharge processes, patient-reported outcomes, and 30-day service use.
Pragmatic mixed-methods clinical trial.
Overall, 4130 patient discharges (2383 preimplementation and 1747 postimplementation) from general medicine and surgical services at a 528-bed academic medical center in the Intermountain United States and 15 attending physicians.
Documented family interaction, late discharge, patient-reported readiness for hospital discharge and postdischarge coping difficulties, readmission and emergency department visits within 30 days postdischarge, and coded interviews with inpatient physicians.
A multivariable segmented regression model indicated a 19% decrease per month in odds of family interaction following intervention implementation (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.76-0.86, P<0.001), and an additional model found a 32% decrease in odds of being discharged after 2 pm (OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.53-0.87, P=0.003). There were no postimplementation changes in patient-reported discharge readiness, postdischarge coping difficulties, or 30-day hospital readmissions, or ED visits. Physicians expressed concerns about the appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the structured social risk assessment.
Conducted in the immediate post-COVID timeframe, reduction in family interaction, earlier discharge, and provider concerns with structured social risk assessments likely contributed to the lack of intervention impact on patient outcomes. To be effective, social risk screening will require patient/family and care team codesign its structure and processes, and allocation of resources to assist in addressing identified social risk needs.
新的 CMS 法规要求在住院期间进行社会风险筛查,但它对住院治疗和患者结局的影响尚不清楚。
评估实施社会风险筛查方案是否能改善出院流程、患者报告的结局和 30 天服务使用情况。
实用型混合方法临床试验。
美国山间地区一家 528 床位的学术医疗中心普通内科和外科服务的 4130 例出院患者(2383 例为实施前,1747 例为实施后),以及 15 名主治医生。
记录家庭互动、延迟出院、患者报告的出院准备情况和出院后应对困难、30 天内再入院和急诊就诊情况,以及对住院医生进行编码访谈。
多变量分段回归模型显示,干预实施后,家庭互动的可能性每月降低 19%(比值比=0.81,95%置信区间=0.76-0.86,P<0.001),另一项模型发现下午 2 点后出院的可能性降低了 32%(比值比=0.68,95%置信区间=0.53-0.87,P=0.003)。患者报告的出院准备情况、出院后应对困难或 30 天内住院再入院或急诊就诊无后续实施变化。医生对结构化社会风险评估的适宜性、可接受性和可行性表示担忧。
在 COVID-19 疫情后的时间内进行的这项研究,家庭互动减少、提前出院以及医生对结构化社会风险评估的担忧,可能导致干预对患者结局没有影响。为了取得效果,社会风险筛查需要患者/家庭和照护团队共同设计其结构和流程,并分配资源来帮助解决已确定的社会风险需求。