Suppr超能文献

为什么没人愿意谈论?在为 LGBTQ+ 群体服务的健康与人类服务机构中,命名和解决象征主义问题面临的挑战。

Why Won't Anyone Talk? Challenges Naming and Addressing Tokenism Within Health and Human Service Agencies Serving the LGBTQ+ Community.

作者信息

Levandowski Brooke A, Rietberg-Miller Susan, Walton Brytelle

机构信息

Author Affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York State.

出版信息

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2025;31(2):E112-E116. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002065. Epub 2024 Sep 10.

Abstract

Workplace tokenism, the use of superficial efforts to appear equitable, which often leads to burnout of marginalized groups, is pervasive, even in health and human service organizations dedicated to improving their community's health and well-being. An original research project to identify interventions addressing tokenism within Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer plus serving health and human service agencies in New York was unable to engage staff in focus groups. A follow-up survey with 41 potential participants reported burnout as the main reason for nonparticipation. Qualitative data revealed desired aftercare for the retraumatizing nature of sharing individual experiences. Utilizing a community-based participatory research approach with an antiracism lens may mitigate challenges addressing tokenism, thereby increasing workplace inclusion of our Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer plus community.

摘要

职场象征主义,即通过表面努力营造公平假象的行为,这种行为常常导致边缘化群体倦怠,在职场中普遍存在,即便在致力于改善社区健康与福祉的卫生和公共服务组织中也是如此。一项旨在确定纽约州为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿群体(LGBTQ+)提供服务的卫生和公共服务机构中应对象征主义干预措施的原创研究项目,未能让员工参与焦点小组。一项针对41名潜在参与者的后续调查显示,倦怠是他们不参与的主要原因。定性数据揭示了由于分享个人经历会造成再次创伤,因此需要后续护理。采用基于社区参与的研究方法并运用反种族主义视角,可能会缓解应对象征主义的挑战,从而增强职场对LGBTQ+群体的包容性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d871/12316157/21807a626192/jpump-31-e112-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验