Buric Ivana, Wrzesien Maja, Milojičić Jelica, Ridderinkhof Anna, De Bruin Esther, Bögels Susan
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Instituto Polibienestar, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 27;15:1385799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1385799. eCollection 2024.
Self-compassion is a fundamental aspect of psychological health and well-being that can be cultivated through self-compassion meditations, but it remains unclear how to facilitate this most effectively. This study is the first to explore whether sensory and semantic priming introduced prior to a guided self-compassion meditation could enhance the effects of meditation in comparison with a control condition.
The study was conducted with 3 × 3 repeated measures between-group design, including three groups (sensory priming, semantic priming and control group), and three assessment time points of state self-compassion, self-criticism, and positive and negative affect (at baseline, after priming, and after guided meditation). Additionally, a meditation appeal questionnaire was used. The total sample size included 71 students who underwent a 3-min priming intervention followed by a 15-min self-compassion guided meditation session.
First, prior to guided meditation, sensory priming significantly decreased state self-criticism more than the control condition or semantic priming, although some reliability issues of the applied self-criticism scale must be taken into consideration. Second, neither sensory nor semantic priming changed state self-compassion, positive affect or negative affect. Third, neither semantic nor sensory priming significantly enhanced the effects of guided self-compassion meditation either in positive and negative affect, self-compassion states, self-criticism states, or in the appeal of the meditation experience.
Although this study is underpowered (estimated post hoc power ranges from 0.20 to 0.42), the findings provide preliminary insights into the potential priming has as a tool to enhance meditation effects and provide guidelines for future studies.
自我同情是心理健康和幸福的一个基本方面,可以通过自我同情冥想培养,但目前尚不清楚如何最有效地促进这一点。本研究首次探讨在引导式自我同情冥想之前引入的感官和语义启动是否能比对照条件更有效地增强冥想效果。
本研究采用3×3组间重复测量设计,包括三组(感官启动组、语义启动组和对照组),以及状态自我同情、自我批评、积极和消极情绪的三个评估时间点(基线、启动后和引导冥想后)。此外,还使用了一份冥想吸引力问卷。总样本量包括71名学生,他们接受了3分钟的启动干预,随后进行了15分钟的自我同情引导冥想课程。
首先,在引导冥想之前,尽管应用的自我批评量表存在一些可靠性问题,但感官启动比对照条件或语义启动更显著地降低了状态自我批评。其次,感官和语义启动都没有改变状态自我同情、积极情绪或消极情绪。第三,语义和感官启动都没有显著增强引导式自我同情冥想在积极和消极情绪、自我同情状态、自我批评状态或冥想体验吸引力方面的效果。
尽管本研究的效能不足(事后估计效能范围为0.20至0.42),但研究结果为启动作为增强冥想效果的工具的潜力提供了初步见解,并为未来研究提供了指导方针。