1Department of Psychology, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, P.R. China.
2Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, School of Clinical Medicine and the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, P.R. China.
J Behav Addict. 2024 Sep 10;13(3):841-853. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00044. Print 2024 Oct 4.
Research on individual differences in brain structural features of internet gaming disorder (IGD) and established addictions such as tobacco use disorder (TUD) is currently limited. This study utilized normative modeling to analyze the cortical thickness (CT) development patterns of male patients with IGD and TUD, aiming to provide further insights into whether IGD qualifies as an addiction.
Surface-based brain morphometry (SBM) was used to calculate CT from T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data of 804 male participants (665 healthy individuals, 68 IGD and 71 TUD). Gaussian process regression was employed to generate normative models of CT development. Deviation maps were produced to depict deviations of IGD and TUD participants from the typical developmental patterns.
Both addiction groups exhibited widespread cortical thinning, particularly in regions such as the bilateral temporal pole and medial orbitofrontal cortex. The TUD group demonstrated a higher degree of individualization and limited spatial overlap compared to the IGD group. Opposite trends in CT changes were observed between the two groups in the bilateral pericalcarine cortex and pars triangularis.
These findings regarding the similarities and differences between IGD and TUD provide support for the idea that IGD shares common features with substance-related addictions and contribute to a deeper understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying IGD.
目前,关于互联网游戏障碍(IGD)和已确立的成瘾(如烟草使用障碍[TUD])的个体脑结构特征的研究较为有限。本研究利用规范建模分析了男性 IGD 和 TUD 患者的皮质厚度(CT)发育模式,旨在深入了解 IGD 是否符合成瘾的标准。
利用基于表面的脑形态计量学(SBM)从 804 名男性参与者(665 名健康个体、68 名 IGD 和 71 名 TUD)的 T1 加权磁共振成像数据中计算 CT。采用高斯过程回归生成 CT 发育的规范模型。生成偏差图以描绘 IGD 和 TUD 参与者与典型发育模式的偏差。
两个成瘾组都表现出广泛的皮质变薄,特别是在双侧颞极和内侧眶额皮质等区域。与 IGD 组相比,TUD 组表现出更高的个体差异和有限的空间重叠。在双侧距状回和三角部,两组的 CT 变化趋势相反。
IGD 和 TUD 之间的这些相似性和差异的发现为 IGD 与物质相关成瘾具有共同特征的观点提供了支持,并有助于深入了解 IGD 背后的神经机制。