Liss Michael A, Dursun Furkan, Hackman G Lavender, Gadallah Mohamed I, Saha Achinto, Friedman Chelsea A, Rathore Atul S, Chandra Preeti, White James R, Tiziani Stefano, DiGiovanni John
Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Natural Science, The University of Texas at Austin, USA.
J Tradit Complement Med. 2024 Mar 7;14(5):558-567. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2024.03.002. eCollection 2024 Sep.
As screening strategies employ better biomarkers and genetics to identify individuals at an increased risk of prostate cancer, there are currently no chemotherapeutic prevention strategies. With any chemoprevention strategy, the population will be younger and healthier; therefore, they will be less tolerant of side effects. This study translated findings from screening a natural product library and pre-clinical evaluation of curcumin (CURC) in combination with ursolic acid (UA) in prostate cancer models. After manufacturing capsules for each compound, 18 subjects were enrolled. The study used a 3 × 3 phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate CURC (1200 mg/day) and UA (300 mg/day) alone and in combination over a 2-week period with endpoints of safety, bioavailability, and microbiome alterations. After enrolling six subjects in each arm, we found no grade 3 or 4 events and only minor changes in the safety laboratory values. In the pooled analysis of groups, we noted a statistically significant difference between median serum levels of UA when administered alone vs administered in the combination (2.7 ng/mL vs 43.8 ng/mL, p = 0.03). Individuals receiving the combination also had a favorable impact on gut microbiome status and a reduction in "microbiome score" predictive of prostate cancer risk.
随着筛查策略采用更好的生物标志物和遗传学方法来识别前列腺癌风险增加的个体,目前尚无化学预防策略。对于任何化学预防策略而言,目标人群将更年轻且更健康;因此,他们对副作用的耐受性会更低。本研究转化了在前列腺癌模型中筛选天然产物文库以及对姜黄素(CURC)与熊果酸(UA)进行临床前评估的结果。在为每种化合物制作胶囊后,招募了18名受试者。该研究采用3×3的1期临床试验,在2周时间内评估单独使用CURC(1200毫克/天)和UA(300毫克/天)以及二者联合使用的情况,终点指标为安全性、生物利用度和微生物组改变。在每组招募6名受试者后,我们未发现3级或4级事件,且安全实验室值仅有轻微变化。在各小组的汇总分析中,我们注意到单独给药与联合给药时UA的血清中位数水平存在统计学显著差异(2.7纳克/毫升对43.8纳克/毫升,p = 0.03)。接受联合用药的个体对肠道微生物组状态也有有利影响,且预测前列腺癌风险的“微生物组评分”有所降低。