Suppr超能文献

客观测量的听力损失与主观感受的助听后听力损失之间的差异:一项范围综述。

Disparities between objectively measured hearing loss and subjectively perceived aided hearing loss: A scoping review.

作者信息

Hindhede Anette Lykke, Soendergaard Natascha Sofie, Toldam Eva Juul, Hansen Niels-Henrik Møller

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.

UCSF: Center for Health Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen N, Denmark.

出版信息

SAGE Open Med. 2024 Sep 9;12:20503121241279230. doi: 10.1177/20503121241279230. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review aims to summarize and synthesize research findings on the disparities between audiometrically diagnosed and aided hearing loss versus the individual's own experience of hearing loss.

METHODS

A systematic search strategy was employed across multiple databases to identify studies published between 1990 and October 2023 focusing on the experiences of hearing problems among individuals with aided hearing loss. The selected studies underwent screening based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These criteria revolved around including papers featuring a population of adult (+18) individuals with audiometrically measured hearing loss who had undergone technological rehabilitation. Data charting was employed to provide an overview of the studies and was additionally utilized to identify key themes. Narrative analysis was used to identify subthemes within the data set.

RESULTS

A total of 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. The analysis identified five themes: "disability experience and discrepancy between measured and self-perceived hearing loss"; "listening effort"; "mental burden/psychological consequences"; "factors that alleviate the consequences of HL"; and "sociodemographic factors."

CONCLUSIONS

The scoping review shows that, despite the proliferation of technological options, there is a pressing need for a more concentrated effort to identify and scrutinize the supplementary facets of hearing loss that remain inadequately addressed by current hearing technology. This includes subjective experiences associated with hearing loss that may not be effectively treated solely with hearing aids.

摘要

目的

本范围综述旨在总结和综合关于听力测量诊断及助听后的听力损失与个体自身听力损失体验之间差异的研究结果。

方法

采用系统检索策略在多个数据库中查找1990年至2023年10月期间发表的聚焦于助听后听力损失个体听力问题体验的研究。所选研究根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准进行筛选。这些标准围绕纳入以成年(+18岁)听力损失个体为研究对象、经听力测量且已接受技术康复的论文展开。采用数据图表法提供研究概述,并额外用于确定关键主题。采用叙事分析法确定数据集中的子主题。

结果

共有11篇文章符合纳入标准。分析确定了五个主题:“残疾体验以及测量的听力损失与自我感知的听力损失之间的差异”;“聆听努力”;“心理负担/心理后果”;“减轻听力损失后果的因素”;以及“社会人口学因素”。

结论

范围综述表明,尽管技术选择众多,但迫切需要更加集中精力识别和审视听力损失中当前听力技术仍未充分解决的补充方面。这包括与听力损失相关的主观体验,仅使用助听器可能无法有效治疗这些体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf03/11388300/78954c19bdd8/10.1177_20503121241279230-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验