Center for Value-Based Care Research, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Primary Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433326. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33326.
Limited data are available on long-term weight loss achieved with semaglutide or liraglutide for type 2 diabetes (T2D) or obesity in clinical practice.
To document weight loss achieved with injectable forms of semaglutide or liraglutide and identify factors associated with weight reduction of 10% or greater at 1 year.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from a large, integrated health system in Ohio and Florida. Participants included adults with a body mass index (calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared) of at least 30.0 who initiated treatment with semaglutide or liraglutide between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2022. Follow-up was completed July 28, 2023.
Injectable forms of semaglutide or liraglutide approved for T2D or obesity.
Percentage weight change and categorical weight reduction of 10% or greater at 1 year.
A total of 3389 patients (mean [SD] age, 50.4 [12.2] years; 1835 [54.7%] female) were identified. Of these, 1341 patients received semaglutide for T2D; 1444, liraglutide for T2D; 227, liraglutide for obesity; and 377, semaglutide for obesity. Mean (SD) percentage weight change at 1 year was -5.1% (7.8%) with semaglutide vs -2.2% (6.4%) with liraglutide (P < .001); -3.2% (6.8%) for T2D as a treatment indication vs -5.9% (9.0%) for obesity (P < .001); and -5.5% (7.5%) with persistent medication coverage (ie, a cumulative gap of less than 90 days) at 1 year vs -2.8% (7.0%) with 90 to 275 medication coverage days and -1.8% (6.7%) with fewer than 90 medication coverage days (P < .001). In the multivariable model, semaglutide vs liraglutide (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.19 [95% CI, 1.77-2.72]), obesity as a treatment indication vs T2D (AOR, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.83-3.30]), persistent medication coverage vs 90 medication coverage days (AOR, 3.36 [95% CI, 2.52-4.54]) or 90 to 275 medication coverage days within the first year (AOR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.10-2.06]), high dosage of the medication vs low (AOR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.11-2.25]), and female sex (AOR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.27-1.94]) were associated with achieving a 10% or greater weight reduction at year 1.
In this retrospective cohort study of 3389 patients with obesity, weight reduction at 1 year was associated with the medication's active agent, its dosage, treatment indication, persistent medication coverage, and patient sex. Future research should focus on identifying the reasons for discontinuation of medication use and interventions aimed at improving long-term persistent coverage.
关于在临床实践中使用司美格鲁肽或利拉鲁肽治疗 2 型糖尿病(T2D)或肥胖症时长期体重减轻的数据有限。
记录使用司美格鲁肽或利拉鲁肽的注射剂型实现的体重减轻,并确定与一年内体重减轻 10%或更多相关的因素。
设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用了俄亥俄州和佛罗里达州一家大型综合健康系统的电子健康记录。参与者包括身体质量指数(BMI)至少为 30.0 的成年人,他们在 2015 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间开始接受司美格鲁肽或利拉鲁肽治疗。随访于 2023 年 7 月 28 日完成。
批准用于 T2D 或肥胖症的注射用司美格鲁肽或利拉鲁肽。
1 年内体重变化的百分比和体重减轻 10%或更多的分类。
共确定了 3389 名患者(平均[标准差]年龄,50.4[12.2]岁;1835[54.7%]女性)。其中,1341 名患者接受司美格鲁肽治疗 T2D;1444 名患者接受利拉鲁肽治疗 T2D;227 名患者接受利拉鲁肽治疗肥胖症;377 名患者接受司美格鲁肽治疗肥胖症。1 年内体重变化的平均(标准差)百分比分别为司美格鲁肽组为-5.1%(7.8%),利拉鲁肽组为-2.2%(6.4%)(P<0.001);T2D 作为治疗指征的-3.2%(6.8%)与肥胖症的-5.9%(9.0%)相比(P<0.001);持续药物覆盖(即累计缺口小于 90 天)的-5.5%(7.5%)与 90 至 275 天药物覆盖的-2.8%(7.0%)和药物覆盖天数少于 90 天的-1.8%(6.7%)相比(P<0.001)。在多变量模型中,司美格鲁肽与利拉鲁肽(调整后的优势比[OR],2.19[95%置信区间,1.77-2.72])、肥胖症作为治疗指征与 T2D(OR,2.46[95%置信区间,1.83-3.30])、持续药物覆盖与 90 天药物覆盖(OR,3.36[95%置信区间,2.52-4.54])或 90 至 275 天药物覆盖(OR,1.50[95%置信区间,1.10-2.06])、高剂量药物与低剂量药物(OR,1.58[95%置信区间,1.11-2.25])和女性(OR,1.57[95%置信区间,1.27-1.94])与 1 年内体重减轻 10%或更多相关。
在这项对 3389 名肥胖症患者的回顾性队列研究中,1 年内的体重减轻与药物的活性成分、剂量、治疗指征、持续药物覆盖和患者性别有关。未来的研究应重点关注确定药物使用中断的原因和旨在改善长期持续覆盖的干预措施。