Suppr超能文献

黎巴嫩 COVID-19 疫苗的免疫原性和真实世界效果:初级和加强免疫计划、变异株、感染和住院的相关见解。

Immunogenicity and real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in Lebanon: Insights from primary and booster schemes, variants, infections, and hospitalization.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.

Department of Internal Medicine, Central Military Hospital, Military Healthcare, Lebanese Army, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 13;19(9):e0306457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306457. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

In this study, we conducted a case-control investigation to assess the immunogenicity and effectiveness of primary and first booster homologous and heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimens against infection and hospitalization, targeting variants circulating in Lebanon during 2021-2022. The study population comprised active Lebanese military personnel between February 2021 and September 2022. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated hospitalization was retrospectively determined during different variant-predominant periods using a case-control study design. Vaccines developed by Sinopharm, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca as well as Sputnik V were analyzed. Prospective assessment of humoral immune response, which was measured based on the SARS-CoV-2 antispike receptor binding domain IgG titer, was performed post vaccination at various time points, focusing on Sinopharm and Pfizer vaccines. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS and GraphPad Prism. COVID-19 VE remained consistently high before the emergence of the Omicron variant, with lower estimates during the Delta wave than those during the Alpha wave for primary vaccination schemes. However, vaccines continued to offer significant protection against infection. VE estimates consistently decreased for the Omicron variant across post-vaccination timeframes and schemes. VE against hospitalization declined over time and was influenced by the variant. No breakthrough infections progressed to critical or fatal COVID-19. Immunogenicity analysis revealed that the homologous Pfizer regimen elicited a stronger humoral response than Sinopharm, while a heterologous Sinopharm/Pfizer regimen yielded comparable results to the Pfizer regimen. Over time, both Sinopharm's and Pfizer's primary vaccination schemes exhibited decreased humoral immunity titers, with Pfizer being a more effective booster than Sinopharm. This study, focusing on healthy young adults, provides insights into VE during different pandemic waves. Continuous research and monitoring are essential for understanding vaccine-mediated immune responses under evolving circumstances.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们进行了病例对照调查,以评估针对感染和住院的原发性和第一次加强同源和异源 COVID-19 疫苗接种方案的免疫原性和效果,针对 2021-2022 年在黎巴嫩流行的变体。研究人群包括 2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 9 月期间的现役黎巴嫩军人。使用病例对照研究设计,在不同变体占主导地位的时期,回顾性确定针对实验室确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 感染和相关住院的疫苗有效性 (VE)。分析了由国药、辉瑞和阿斯利康以及卫星 V 开发的疫苗。根据 SARS-CoV-2 刺突受体结合域 IgG 滴度,对免疫后体液免疫反应进行了前瞻性评估,在不同时间点进行了评估,重点是国药和辉瑞疫苗。使用 IBM SPSS 和 GraphPad Prism 进行统计分析。在 Omicron 变体出现之前,COVID-19 VE 一直保持较高水平,与 Alpha 波相比,Delta 波时的初级疫苗接种方案的估计值较低。然而,疫苗继续提供对感染的显著保护。在接种疫苗后的各个时间段和方案中,针对 Omicron 变体的 VE 估计值持续下降。随着时间的推移,VE 对住院的下降受到变体的影响。没有突破性感染进展为严重或致命的 COVID-19。免疫原性分析表明,同源辉瑞方案比国药方案引起更强的体液反应,而异源国药/辉瑞方案产生的结果与辉瑞方案相当。随着时间的推移,国药和辉瑞的初级疫苗接种方案均表现出血液免疫球蛋白滴度下降,辉瑞作为加强针比国药更有效。这项针对健康年轻成年人的研究提供了对不同大流行浪潮中 VE 的见解。持续的研究和监测对于了解不断变化情况下疫苗介导的免疫反应至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/befc/11398646/97dbe4de89ac/pone.0306457.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验