• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient engagement as a collaborative process in a large Dutch COVID-19 vaccination study (RECOVAC) - insight into the contribution of patient engagement and learnings for the future.在荷兰一项大型新冠疫苗接种研究(RECOVAC)中,患者参与作为一个协作过程——洞察患者参与的贡献及对未来的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 13;10(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00622-x.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.
4
Patient and public involvement of young people with a chronic condition: lessons learned and practical tips from a large participatory program.慢性病青年患者及公众的参与:大型参与式项目的经验教训与实用建议
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Sep 30;6:59. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00234-1. eCollection 2020.
5
Lessons learned in measuring patient engagement in a Canada-wide childhood disability network.在加拿大全国性儿童残疾网络中衡量患者参与度所汲取的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 7;10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00551-9.
6
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
7
Engaging patient and community stakeholders in the optimization of the Compassionate And Loving Mindset towards heart health risk (CALM Hearts) physical activity intervention: a description of initial work and protocol for future engagement activities.让患者和社区利益相关者参与优化针对心脏健康风险的关爱心态(CALM Hearts)体育活动干预:初步工作描述及未来参与活动方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 May 1;10(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00577-z.
8
"I think there has to be a mutual respect for there to be value": Evaluating patient engagement in a national clinical trial on de-implementation of low value care.“我认为要想实现价值,必须要有相互尊重”:评估患者在一项关于减少低价值医疗服务实施的全国性临床试验中的参与情况。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 26;9(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00483-w.
9
Co-creating with patients an impact framework across the medicine's life cycle: a qualitative study exploring patients' experiences of involvement in and perceptions of impact measures.与患者共同创建贯穿药物生命周期的影响框架:一项探索患者参与影响措施的经历和认知的定性研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 2;8(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00334-0.
10
Embedding research codesign knowledge and practice: Learnings from researchers in a new research institute in Australia.融入研究协同设计知识与实践:来自澳大利亚一家新研究机构研究人员的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 7;8(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00392-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation Tools for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Health Research: A Scoping Review.健康研究中患者及公众参与(PPI)的评估工具:一项范围综述
Patient. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00765-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence to preventive measures after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and after awareness of antibody response in kidney transplant recipients in the Netherlands: a nationwide questionnaire study.荷兰肾移植受者接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗后及知晓抗体反应后的预防措施依从性:一项全国性问卷调查研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jul 20;62:102103. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102103. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Patient Engagement in Health Research: Perspectives from Patient Participants.患者参与健康研究:患者参与者的观点。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 26;30(3):2770-2780. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030210.
3
Impact of immunosuppressive treatment and type of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine on antibody levels after three vaccinations in patients with chronic kidney disease or kidney replacement therapy.免疫抑制治疗和新型冠状病毒2型疫苗类型对慢性肾脏病或肾脏替代治疗患者三次接种疫苗后抗体水平的影响
Clin Kidney J. 2022 Nov 24;16(3):528-540. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac249. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Alternative strategies to increase the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in kidney transplant recipients not responding to two or three doses of an mRNA vaccine (RECOVAC): a randomised clinical trial.在未对两到三剂 mRNA 疫苗(RECOVAC)产生应答的肾移植受者中提高 COVID-19 疫苗免疫原性的替代策略:一项随机临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Mar;23(3):307-319. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00650-8. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
Developing and testing guidance to support researchers engaging patient partners in health-related research.制定并测试相关指南,以支持研究人员让患者合作伙伴参与健康相关研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 26;8(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00378-2.
6
Antibody and T-Cell Responses 6 Months After Coronavirus Disease 2019 Messenger RNA-1273 Vaccination in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease, on Dialysis, or Living With a Kidney Transplant.慢性肾脏病、透析或肾移植患者接种新冠肺炎信使 RNA-1273 疫苗 6 个月后的抗体和 T 细胞反应。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;76(3):e188-e199. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac557.
7
Long-term efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with chronic kidney disease, on dialysis or after kidney transplantation: a national prospective observational cohort study.慢性肾脏病、透析或肾移植患者中 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种的长期疗效和安全性:一项全国前瞻性观察性队列研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Feb 5;23(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02680-3.
8
The RECOVAC Immune-response Study: The Immunogenicity, Tolerability, and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease, on Dialysis, or Living With a Kidney Transplant.RECOVAC 免疫反应研究:COVID-19 疫苗在慢性肾脏病、透析或肾移植患者中的免疫原性、耐受性和安全性。
Transplantation. 2022 Apr 1;106(4):821-834. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003983.
9
The RECOVAC IR study: the immune response and safety of the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease, on dialysis or living with a kidney transplant.RECOVAC IR研究:mRNA-1273新冠疫苗在慢性肾病患者、接受透析患者或肾移植受者中的免疫反应及安全性
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021 Aug 27;36(9):1761-1764. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab186.
10
Co-creation of practical "how-to guides" for patient engagement in key phases of medicines development-from theory to implementation.共同创建实用的“操作指南”,以促进患者在药物研发关键阶段的参与——从理论到实践。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Aug 23;7(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00294-x.

在荷兰一项大型新冠疫苗接种研究(RECOVAC)中,患者参与作为一个协作过程——洞察患者参与的贡献及对未来的经验教训。

Patient engagement as a collaborative process in a large Dutch COVID-19 vaccination study (RECOVAC) - insight into the contribution of patient engagement and learnings for the future.

作者信息

Vervoort J P M, Konijn W S, Jansen D E M C, Boersma C, de Zeeuw J, Ho-Dac-Pannekeet M M, Gansevoort R T, Messchendorp A L, Sanders J S F, de Wildt-Liesveld R

机构信息

Dutch Kidney Patients Association (NVN), Bussum, The Netherlands.

Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 13;10(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00622-x.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-024-00622-x
PMID:39272117
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11395945/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The need for patient engagement in health research has been increasingly acknowledged and accepted in recent years. However, implementation is still limited due to lack of evidence on its value and lack of guidance on how to implement patient engagement. This study aims to provide insight into the contribution of patient engagement in the RECOVAC project, which studied COVID-19 vaccination in kidney patients, and formulate concrete practice-based action perspectives for patient engagement.

METHODS

We used a qualitative participatory mixed methods approach, based on the Patient Engagement Monitoring and Evaluation (PEME) framework. Patient engagement and data collection were based on the Reflexive Monitoring in Action (RMA) approach. Data collection included participant observations, open ended questionnaires and interactive reflection sessions. Qualitative analysis was done via a thematic approach.

RESULTS

We have described the process of patient engagement systematically, provided insight in its value and found that there is a need for clear aims, expectations and preparations from the start of the engagement process. We have shown that reflection throughout the process is of utmost importance and the same applies to clear communication between researchers and patient representatives. By being part of the consortium patient representatives had direct access to information, straight from the source, on for example the vaccination schedule and medication availability and had indirect influence on decisions made by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) on preventive measures and treatment against COVID-19. Having experienced patient representatives is important, otherwise training needs to be provided. We also found that patient engagement had impact on conduct and outcomes of research activities itself and may have impact on future research and patient engagement activities in general.

CONCLUSION

Patient engagement has changed the course of the project. Concrete practice-based action perspectives have been formulated, which are already being implemented by the Dutch Kidney Patients Association (NVN). Studying patient engagement in a high pace project with high public interest has resulted in lessons learned and will help prepare and implement patient involvement in future research projects.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The RECOVAC studies in which the patient engagement took place are registered at clinicialtrial.gov (NCT04741386 registration date 2021-02-04, NCT04841785 registration date 2021-03-22 and NCT05030974 registration date 2021-08-20).

摘要

背景

近年来,患者参与健康研究的必要性已得到越来越多的认可和接受。然而,由于缺乏关于其价值的证据以及缺乏如何实施患者参与的指导,其实施仍然有限。本研究旨在深入了解患者参与RECOVAC项目的贡献,该项目研究了肾病患者的新冠疫苗接种情况,并为患者参与制定基于实践的具体行动观点。

方法

我们采用了基于患者参与监测与评估(PEME)框架的定性参与式混合方法。患者参与和数据收集基于行动中的反思性监测(RMA)方法。数据收集包括参与观察、开放式问卷调查和互动反思会议。定性分析通过主题方法进行。

结果

我们系统地描述了患者参与的过程,深入了解了其价值,并发现从参与过程开始就需要明确的目标、期望和准备。我们表明,在整个过程中进行反思至关重要,研究人员与患者代表之间的清晰沟通也是如此。作为联盟的一部分,患者代表可以直接从源头获取例如疫苗接种时间表和药物供应等信息,并对国家公共卫生与环境研究所(RIVM)就新冠疫情预防措施和治疗做出的决策产生间接影响。拥有经验丰富的患者代表很重要,否则需要提供培训。我们还发现患者参与对研究活动本身的开展和结果产生了影响,并且可能对未来的研究和一般患者参与活动产生影响。

结论

患者参与改变了项目的进程。已经制定了基于实践的具体行动观点,荷兰肾病患者协会(NVN)已经在实施这些观点。在一个具有高度公众关注度的快节奏项目中研究患者参与,收获了经验教训,并将有助于为未来研究项目中患者参与的准备和实施提供帮助。

临床试验注册

进行患者参与的RECOVAC研究已在clinicaltrial.gov上注册(NCT04741386注册日期2021年2月4日,NCT04841785注册日期2021年3月22日,NCT05030974注册日期2021年8月20日)。