• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缅甸通过克达哈捕捉系统管理野生亚洲象数量过多问题的历史记载:理念、原则与实践

Historical Account of Managing Overabundant Wild Asian Elephants in Myanmar by the Kheddah System of Capture: Philosophy, Principles and Practices.

作者信息

Mar Khyne U

机构信息

Asian Elephant Management, Asian Elephant Specialist Group (The International Union for Conservation of Nature), 12 Blackwell Place, Sheffield S2 5PX, South Yorkshire, UK.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;14(17):2506. doi: 10.3390/ani14172506.

DOI:10.3390/ani14172506
PMID:39272292
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11393919/
Abstract

When standard methods of human-elephant conflict mitigation are not successful, free-ranging wild elephants may continue to come into close contact with people. This results in more frequent and severe conflict, with consequences ranging from crop raiding to loss of human and elephant lives. Understandably, in such situations, local communities may want to be rid of entire herds of elephants. Historically, one of the strategies the Myanmar Government practiced to resolve human-elephant conflict was the capture of whole herds using the Kheddah system. This involved trapping the herd in a stockade, immediately followed by on-site post-capture taming. After taming, the captured elephants were utilized as logging elephants. Elephants worked in timber extraction, retired at age 55 years and were then cared for by the Government until they died. The capture of wild elephants by the Kheddah system was formally banned in Myanmar in 1985 but occasional, small-scale, captures were allowed until 2013 under the strict control of the Myanmar Government. These operations were aimed primarily at capturing elephants involved in human-elephant conflict, rather than to supplement the working elephant population. One of the last Kheddah operations, organized and managed by the author, was conducted in 1996 at the Taikkyi township of the Yangon Region, as a last resort to end human-elephant conflict in an emergency. While chemical immobilization was being used at this time, it was not logistically possible with the high numbers of elephants engaged in the conflict. This review aims to record the history of an activity that was an important element of Myanmar's timber industry more than three decades ago. In this paper, the author presents a description of Kheddah not to endorse it, but to document (1) the Myanmar elephant population management strategy in the past, before it is forgotten, and (2) the practicality of the Kheddha operation when the singly selected commonly- used immobilization or noosing method of elephant capture is unfeasible. The author attempts to shed light on the modern veterinary procedures that may significantly reduce the notorious historical outcome of Kheddha, especially the resulting mortality of captured elephants, should the Kheddha system of capture ever be used as an emergency solution for ongoing problems of human-elephant conflict in the range states of Asia.

摘要

当减轻人象冲突的标准方法未取得成功时,自由放养的野生大象可能会继续与人类密切接触。这会导致冲突更加频繁和严重,其后果从庄稼遭袭到人员伤亡和大象死亡不等。可以理解的是,在这种情况下,当地社区可能希望除掉整群大象。从历史上看,缅甸政府为解决人象冲突而采取的策略之一是使用凯达(Kheddah)捕象法捕获整群大象。这包括将象群困在围栏中,随后立即在现场进行捕获后的驯化。驯化后,捕获的大象被用作伐木象。大象从事木材采伐工作,55岁退休,然后由政府照料直至死亡。1985年,缅甸正式禁止使用凯达捕象法捕获野生大象,但在缅甸政府的严格控制下,直到2013年仍允许偶尔进行小规模捕获。这些行动主要旨在捕获卷入人象冲突的大象,而非补充役用象的数量。由作者组织和管理的最后一次凯达行动之一于1996年在仰光省德耶镇进行,作为在紧急情况下结束人象冲突的最后手段。当时虽然使用了化学保定法,但对于卷入冲突的大量大象而言,在后勤保障上是不可能的。本综述旨在记录一项活动的历史,该活动在三十多年前是缅甸木材行业的一个重要组成部分。在本文中,作者描述凯达捕象法并非为了支持它,而是为了记录:(1)缅甸过去的大象种群管理策略,以免被遗忘;(2)当单独选择常用的保定或套索捕象方法不可行时,凯达行动的实用性。作者试图阐明现代兽医程序,这些程序可能会显著降低凯达捕象法历来臭名昭著的后果,特别是捕获大象的死亡率,倘若凯达捕象法被用作解决亚洲分布国当前人象冲突问题的应急方案的话。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/f334e6439d18/animals-14-02506-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/7590ecbabf66/animals-14-02506-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/df44bd685215/animals-14-02506-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/08a1eb2243fc/animals-14-02506-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/735cb97b74ae/animals-14-02506-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/613108080b7c/animals-14-02506-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/d58851c1b36c/animals-14-02506-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/f334e6439d18/animals-14-02506-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/7590ecbabf66/animals-14-02506-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/df44bd685215/animals-14-02506-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/08a1eb2243fc/animals-14-02506-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/735cb97b74ae/animals-14-02506-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/613108080b7c/animals-14-02506-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/d58851c1b36c/animals-14-02506-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f4a/11393919/f334e6439d18/animals-14-02506-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Historical Account of Managing Overabundant Wild Asian Elephants in Myanmar by the Kheddah System of Capture: Philosophy, Principles and Practices.缅甸通过克达哈捕捉系统管理野生亚洲象数量过多问题的历史记载:理念、原则与实践
Animals (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;14(17):2506. doi: 10.3390/ani14172506.
2
Investigating changes within the handling system of the largest semi-captive population of Asian elephants.调查最大半圈养亚洲象种群处理系统内的变化。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 31;14(1):e0209701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209701. eCollection 2019.
3
Testing the Effectiveness of the "Smelly" Elephant Repellent in Controlled Experiments in Semi-Captive Asian and African Savanna Elephants.在半圈养的亚洲和非洲草原象的对照实验中测试“臭”象驱避剂的有效性。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;13(21):3334. doi: 10.3390/ani13213334.
4
Causes and correlates of calf mortality in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus).圈养亚洲象(Elephas maximus)幼象死亡的原因及相关因素。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032335. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
5
Differences in age-specific mortality between wild-caught and captive-born Asian elephants.野生和圈养亚洲象在特定年龄段死亡率上的差异。
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 7;9(1):3023. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05515-8.
6
Human-Elephant Conflicts and Villagers' Attitudes and Knowledge in the Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve, China.中国西双版纳自然保护区的人象冲突和村民的态度与知识。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;17(23):8910. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238910.
7
The efficacy of interventions to protect crops from raiding elephants.保护作物免受大象侵害的干预措施的效果。
Ambio. 2022 Mar;51(3):716-727. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01587-x. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
8
Do topography and fruit presence influence occurrence and intensity of crop-raiding by forest elephants (Loxodonta africana cyclotis)?地形和果实存在是否会影响森林象(非洲草原象指名亚种)的作物掠夺发生和强度?
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 22;14(3):e0213971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213971. eCollection 2019.
9
Capture from the wild has long-term costs on reproductive success in Asian elephants.从野外捕获对亚洲象的繁殖成功率有长期影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Oct 9;286(1912):20191584. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1584.
10
Long-term trends in wild-capture and population dynamics point to an uncertain future for captive elephants.野生捕获和种群动态的长期趋势表明圈养大象的未来充满不确定性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Mar 27;286(1899):20182810. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2810.

本文引用的文献

1
Asian elephant calf physiology and mahout perspectives during taming in Myanmar.缅甸驯象过程中亚洲象幼崽的生理状况及驯象人的观点
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Apr 10;11(4):231172. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231172. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Taming age mortality in semi-captive Asian elephants.半圈养亚洲象的老龄化死亡率控制。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 5;10(1):1889. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58590-7.
3
Capture from the wild has long-term costs on reproductive success in Asian elephants.从野外捕获对亚洲象的繁殖成功率有长期影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Oct 9;286(1912):20191584. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1584.
4
The Dividing Line Between Wildlife Research and Management-Implications for Animal Welfare.野生动物研究与管理的分界线——对动物福利的影响
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Feb 5;6:13. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00013. eCollection 2019.
5
Differences in age-specific mortality between wild-caught and captive-born Asian elephants.野生和圈养亚洲象在特定年龄段死亡率上的差异。
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 7;9(1):3023. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05515-8.
6
Effects of social disruption in elephants persist decades after culling.大象在被猎杀几十年后,仍会受到社会破坏的影响。
Front Zool. 2013 Oct 23;10(1):62. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-10-62.
7
Causes and correlates of calf mortality in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus).圈养亚洲象(Elephas maximus)幼象死亡的原因及相关因素。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032335. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
8
Physiological and behavioural responses of young horses to hot iron branding and microchip implantation.幼马对热铁烙印和微芯片植入的生理和行为反应。
Vet J. 2012 Feb;191(2):171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
9
Reproductive problems directly attributable to long-term captivity--asymmetric reproductive aging.直接归因于长期圈养的生殖问题——不对称生殖衰老。
Anim Reprod Sci. 2004 Jul;82-83:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.05.015.
10
Hearing in the elephant (Elephas maximus): absolute sensitivity, frequency discrimination, and sound localization.大象(印度象)的听觉:绝对灵敏度、频率辨别和声音定位。
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1982 Dec;96(6):926-44.