Mar Khyne U
Asian Elephant Management, Asian Elephant Specialist Group (The International Union for Conservation of Nature), 12 Blackwell Place, Sheffield S2 5PX, South Yorkshire, UK.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;14(17):2506. doi: 10.3390/ani14172506.
When standard methods of human-elephant conflict mitigation are not successful, free-ranging wild elephants may continue to come into close contact with people. This results in more frequent and severe conflict, with consequences ranging from crop raiding to loss of human and elephant lives. Understandably, in such situations, local communities may want to be rid of entire herds of elephants. Historically, one of the strategies the Myanmar Government practiced to resolve human-elephant conflict was the capture of whole herds using the Kheddah system. This involved trapping the herd in a stockade, immediately followed by on-site post-capture taming. After taming, the captured elephants were utilized as logging elephants. Elephants worked in timber extraction, retired at age 55 years and were then cared for by the Government until they died. The capture of wild elephants by the Kheddah system was formally banned in Myanmar in 1985 but occasional, small-scale, captures were allowed until 2013 under the strict control of the Myanmar Government. These operations were aimed primarily at capturing elephants involved in human-elephant conflict, rather than to supplement the working elephant population. One of the last Kheddah operations, organized and managed by the author, was conducted in 1996 at the Taikkyi township of the Yangon Region, as a last resort to end human-elephant conflict in an emergency. While chemical immobilization was being used at this time, it was not logistically possible with the high numbers of elephants engaged in the conflict. This review aims to record the history of an activity that was an important element of Myanmar's timber industry more than three decades ago. In this paper, the author presents a description of Kheddah not to endorse it, but to document (1) the Myanmar elephant population management strategy in the past, before it is forgotten, and (2) the practicality of the Kheddha operation when the singly selected commonly- used immobilization or noosing method of elephant capture is unfeasible. The author attempts to shed light on the modern veterinary procedures that may significantly reduce the notorious historical outcome of Kheddha, especially the resulting mortality of captured elephants, should the Kheddha system of capture ever be used as an emergency solution for ongoing problems of human-elephant conflict in the range states of Asia.
当减轻人象冲突的标准方法未取得成功时,自由放养的野生大象可能会继续与人类密切接触。这会导致冲突更加频繁和严重,其后果从庄稼遭袭到人员伤亡和大象死亡不等。可以理解的是,在这种情况下,当地社区可能希望除掉整群大象。从历史上看,缅甸政府为解决人象冲突而采取的策略之一是使用凯达(Kheddah)捕象法捕获整群大象。这包括将象群困在围栏中,随后立即在现场进行捕获后的驯化。驯化后,捕获的大象被用作伐木象。大象从事木材采伐工作,55岁退休,然后由政府照料直至死亡。1985年,缅甸正式禁止使用凯达捕象法捕获野生大象,但在缅甸政府的严格控制下,直到2013年仍允许偶尔进行小规模捕获。这些行动主要旨在捕获卷入人象冲突的大象,而非补充役用象的数量。由作者组织和管理的最后一次凯达行动之一于1996年在仰光省德耶镇进行,作为在紧急情况下结束人象冲突的最后手段。当时虽然使用了化学保定法,但对于卷入冲突的大量大象而言,在后勤保障上是不可能的。本综述旨在记录一项活动的历史,该活动在三十多年前是缅甸木材行业的一个重要组成部分。在本文中,作者描述凯达捕象法并非为了支持它,而是为了记录:(1)缅甸过去的大象种群管理策略,以免被遗忘;(2)当单独选择常用的保定或套索捕象方法不可行时,凯达行动的实用性。作者试图阐明现代兽医程序,这些程序可能会显著降低凯达捕象法历来臭名昭著的后果,特别是捕获大象的死亡率,倘若凯达捕象法被用作解决亚洲分布国当前人象冲突问题的应急方案的话。