Department of Chemistry, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12604, USA.
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 28;25(17):9342. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179342.
We describe the antioxidant capability of scavenging the superoxide radical of several tea and yerba mate samples using rotating ring-disk electrochemistry (RRDE). We directly measured superoxide concentrations and detected their decrease upon the addition of an antioxidant to the electrochemical cell. We studied two varieties of yerba mate, two varieties of black tea from Bangladesh, a sample of Pu-erh tea from China, and two components, caffeic acid and chlorogenic acid. All of these plant infusions and components showed strong antioxidant activities, virtually annihilating the available superoxide concentration. Using density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we describe a mechanism of superoxide scavenging via caffeic and chlorogenic acids. Superoxide can initially interact at two sites in these acids: the H4 catechol hydrogen or the acidic proton of the acid . For , caffeic acid needs an additional π-π superoxide radical, which transfers electron density to the ring and forms a HO anion. A second caffeic acid proton and HO anion forms HO. Chlorogenic acid acts differently, as the initial approach of superoxide to the catechol moiety is enough to form the HO anion. After an additional acidic proton of chlorogenic acid is given to HO, three well-separated compounds arise: (1) a carboxylate moiety, (2) HO, and a (3) chlorogenic acid semiquinone. The latter can capture a second superoxide in a π-π manner, which remains trapped due to the aromatic ring, as for caffeic acid. With enough of both acids and superoxide radicals, the final products are equivalent: HO plus a complex of the type [X-acid-η-O], X = caffeic, chlorogenic. Chlorogenic acid is described by the following reaction: 2 O + 2 chlorogenic acid → 2 chlorogenic carboxylate + O + HO, and so, it acts as a non-enzymatic superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimic, as shown via the product formation of O plus HO, which is limited due to chlorogenic acid consumption. Caffeic acid differs from chlorogenic acid, as there is no acidic proton capture via superoxide. In this case, approaching a second superoxide to the H4 polyphenol moiety forms a HO anion and, later, an HO molecule upon the transfer of a second caffeic acid proton.
我们使用旋转环盘电极(RRDE)描述了几种茶和马黛茶样品清除超氧自由基的抗氧化能力。我们直接测量了超氧浓度,并检测到在向电化学电池中添加抗氧化剂后其浓度降低。我们研究了两种马黛茶、两种来自孟加拉国的红茶、一种来自中国的普洱样品以及两种成分,即咖啡酸和绿原酸。所有这些植物浸液和成分都表现出很强的抗氧化活性,几乎完全消除了可用的超氧浓度。使用密度泛函理论(DFT)计算,我们描述了通过咖啡酸和绿原酸清除超氧自由基的机制。超氧自由基最初可以在这些酸的两个位置相互作用:(1)H4 儿茶酚氢或酸的酸性质子。对于,咖啡酸需要另外一个π-π超氧自由基,它将电子密度转移到环上并形成 HO 阴离子。第二个咖啡酸质子和 HO 阴离子形成 HO。绿原酸的作用不同,因为超氧自由基最初接近儿茶酚部分足以形成 HO 阴离子。绿原酸的儿茶酚部分接受另一个超氧自由基后,形成三种分离的化合物:(1)一个羧酸盐部分,(2)HO 和(3)绿原酸半醌。后者可以以 π-π 方式捕获第二个超氧自由基,由于芳环的存在,该超氧自由基仍然被捕获,就像咖啡酸一样。有足够的酸和超氧自由基,最终产物是等效的:HO 加上[X-酸-η-O]类型的复合物,X = 咖啡酸、绿原酸。绿原酸的反应如下:2 O + 2 绿原酸→2 绿原酸羧酸盐+O+HO,因此,它作为一种非酶超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)模拟物起作用,这可以通过 O 和 HO 的产物形成来证明,由于绿原酸的消耗,HO 的形成受到限制。咖啡酸与绿原酸不同,因为没有通过超氧自由基捕获酸性质子。在这种情况下,第二个超氧自由基接近 H4 多酚部分形成 HO 阴离子,随后在第二个咖啡酸质子转移后形成 HO 分子。