• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理人员对辅助生活设施护理机器人的看法:系统文献综述

Nursing Staff's Perspectives of Care Robots for Assisted Living Facilities: Systematic Literature Review.

作者信息

Trainum Katie, Liu Jiaying, Hauser Elliott, Xie Bo

机构信息

School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.

School of Information, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Aging. 2024 Sep 16;7:e58629. doi: 10.2196/58629.

DOI:10.2196/58629
PMID:39283666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11443223/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Care robots have been proposed in response to nursing shortages in assisted living facilities (ALFs) and the growing population of older adults. While the use of care robots may improve the general health and well-being of older adults, their introduction changes the work of nursing staff fundamentally, and it has implications for the entire health care system. In developing such technology, it is important to include end users, but so far, the nursing staff's perspectives have largely been ignored.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine the literature on nursing staff's attitudes, needs, and preferences related to the use of care robots in ALFs, in order to discover gaps in the literature and guide future research.

METHODS

This review follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 protocol. On May 12, 2023, we searched PubMed, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, PsycINFO, the IEEE Xplore Digital Library, and the ACM Digital Library using predetermined search terms. Included publications, written in English, focused on the predevelopment phase, in which information was gathered on nursing staff's attitudes, needs, and preferences regarding care robots for ALFs. Publications were excluded if they did not provide peer-reviewed empirical data. The studies' findings were summarized, coded, and analyzed into major themes using thematic analysis and narrative synthesis. Their quality was assessed using McGill University's Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools.

RESULTS

The final sample included 15 studies. Most of the studies (n=11, 73%) were rated as good quality; however, there was a general lack of reporting on important methodological decisions and sample characteristics. Nursing staff desired care robots that could assist with physically demanding tasks and reduce their workload but had mixed feelings on whether robots could or should assist with social tasks. In addition, nursing staff are concerned about the ethics of care robots, as well as about their safety, accessibility, and operability. The nursing staff's culture, qualification, and role in the facility may influence their perspectives of care robots. The studies lacked theory-driven designs and large sample sizes. Eight (53%) studies mentioned using a participatory design approach, but a lack of established criteria for what constitutes participatory design leads to varying degrees of methodological quality.

CONCLUSIONS

There was consensus among nursing staff that care robots should serve as nursing assistants to reduce workload. Whether robots could or should assist with social tasks remains a question. Further research is needed to mitigate nursing staff's concerns and understand the socioecological factors that influence their perspectives of care robots and their adoption in ALFs. In addition, theory-driven and large sample size study designs are necessary, as well as work to develop clear criteria for related participatory design research.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b833/11443223/f3679225861d/aging_v7i1e58629_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b833/11443223/f3679225861d/aging_v7i1e58629_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b833/11443223/f3679225861d/aging_v7i1e58629_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

针对辅助生活设施(ALF)中护理人员短缺以及老年人口不断增长的情况,护理机器人应运而生。虽然使用护理机器人可能会改善老年人的总体健康状况和幸福感,但其引入从根本上改变了护理人员的工作,并且对整个医疗保健系统都有影响。在开发此类技术时,纳入最终用户很重要,但到目前为止,护理人员的观点在很大程度上被忽视了。

目的

本研究旨在审视关于护理人员对在ALF中使用护理机器人的态度、需求和偏好的文献,以发现文献中的空白并指导未来的研究。

方法

本综述遵循PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)2020协议。2023年5月12日,我们使用预先确定的搜索词在PubMed、CINAHL Plus全文数据库、PsycINFO、IEEE Xplore数字图书馆和ACM数字图书馆中进行了搜索。纳入的英文出版物聚焦于开发前阶段,在此阶段收集了护理人员对ALF护理机器人的态度、需求和偏好方面的信息。如果出版物未提供经过同行评审的实证数据,则将其排除。使用主题分析和叙述性综合对研究结果进行总结、编码并分析为主要主题。使用麦吉尔大学的混合方法评估工具和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评估工具对其质量进行评估。

结果

最终样本包括15项研究。大多数研究(n = 11,73%)被评为高质量;然而,在重要方法决策和样本特征的报告方面普遍存在不足。护理人员希望护理机器人能够协助完成体力要求较高的任务并减轻他们的工作量,但对于机器人是否能够或应该协助完成社交任务,他们的看法不一。此外,护理人员担心护理机器人的伦理问题以及它们的安全性、可及性和可操作性。护理人员的文化、资质以及在设施中的角色可能会影响他们对护理机器人的看法。这些研究缺乏理论驱动的设计且样本量较小。八项(53%)研究提到采用参与式设计方法,但对于什么构成参与式设计缺乏既定标准,导致方法质量存在不同程度的差异。

结论

护理人员一致认为护理机器人应作为护理助手以减轻工作量。机器人是否能够或应该协助完成社交任务仍然是一个问题。需要进一步研究以减轻护理人员的担忧,并了解影响他们对护理机器人的看法及其在ALF中应用的社会生态因素。此外,理论驱动和大样本量的研究设计是必要的,同时还需要努力为相关参与式设计研究制定明确的标准。

相似文献

1
Nursing Staff's Perspectives of Care Robots for Assisted Living Facilities: Systematic Literature Review.护理人员对辅助生活设施护理机器人的看法:系统文献综述
JMIR Aging. 2024 Sep 16;7:e58629. doi: 10.2196/58629.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响低收入和中等收入国家熟练助产士提供产时和产后护理的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD011558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
10
Effectiveness of team nursing compared with total patient care on staff wellbeing when organizing nursing work in acute care wards: a systematic review.在急性护理病房组织护理工作时,团队护理与全病人护理相比对员工幸福感的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):128-68. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2428.

引用本文的文献

1
Responsible and adaptive robots in care home settings: an implementation framework analysis of a workshop with public and professionals.养老院环境中负责且适应性强的机器人:与公众和专业人士举办的研讨会的实施框架分析
Front Robot AI. 2025 Jul 25;12:1610329. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1610329. eCollection 2025.
2
Utilisation of robots in nursing practice: an umbrella review.机器人在护理实践中的应用:一项综合综述。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Mar 4;24(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02842-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Assistive robotic systems in nursing care: a scoping review.护理中的辅助机器人系统:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2023 Mar 18;22(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01230-y.
2
Robots in Assisted Living Facilities: Scoping Review.辅助生活设施中的机器人:范围综述。
JMIR Aging. 2023 Mar 6;6:e42652. doi: 10.2196/42652.
3
An integrative review exploring the impact of Electronic Health Records (EHR) on the quality of nurse-patient interactions and communication.一项综合综述,旨在探讨电子健康记录(EHR)对护患互动和沟通质量的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Jan;79(1):48-67. doi: 10.1111/jan.15484. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
Robots in Healthcare: a Scoping Review.医疗保健领域的机器人:一项范围综述。
Curr Robot Rep. 2022;3(4):271-280. doi: 10.1007/s43154-022-00095-4. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
5
Technological risks and ethical implications of using robots in long-term care.长期护理中使用机器人的技术风险与伦理影响。
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2022 Jun 17;9:20556683221106917. doi: 10.1177/20556683221106917. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Evaluating the Costs of Nurse Burnout-Attributed Turnover: A Markov Modeling Approach.评估护士倦怠导致离职的成本:马尔可夫建模方法。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Jun 1;18(4):351-357. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000920. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
7
Can technology impact loneliness in dementia? A scoping review on the role of assistive technologies in delivering psychosocial interventions in long-term care.技术能否影响痴呆症患者的孤独感?辅助技术在长期护理中实施心理社会干预的作用:范围综述。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Oct;18(7):1107-1119. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1984594. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
8
The Upcoming Role for Nursing and Assistive Robotics: Opportunities and Challenges Ahead.护理与辅助机器人技术的未来角色:前方的机遇与挑战
Front Digit Health. 2020 Dec 1;2:585656. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.585656. eCollection 2020.
9
Maximizing the Benefits of Participatory Design for Human-Robot Interaction Research With Older Adults.最大限度地提高参与式设计在老年人人机交互研究中的益处。
Hum Factors. 2022 May;64(3):441-450. doi: 10.1177/00187208211037465. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
10
Can a humanoid social robot stimulate the interactivity of cognitively impaired elderly? A thorough study based on computer vision methods.人形社交机器人能否激发认知障碍老年人的互动性?一项基于计算机视觉方法的深入研究。
Vis Comput. 2021;37(12):3019-3038. doi: 10.1007/s00371-021-02242-y. Epub 2021 Jul 30.