Suppr超能文献

结构家庭因素与学校欺凌:基于中国青少年样本的大规模调查。

Structural family factors and bullying at school: a large scale investigation based on a Chinese adolescent sample.

机构信息

Dalian Seventh People's Hospital, 179# Lingshui Road, Dalian, 116023, China.

Division of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 11;21(1):2249. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12367-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

Various family factors have been identified in association with school bullying and the involvement of children and adolescents in bullying behaviors.

METHODS

A total of 11,919 participants (female = 6671, mean age = 15) from 22 middle schools in Suzhou City, China completed the questionnaire. The associations between structural family factors (family socio-economic status, living arrangement, number of siblings, whether they were local residents/migrants, had an urban/rural hukou [a household registration system in China], parental and maternal education levels, and other various bullying-related constructs (i.e. bullying witnessing, bullying involvement, bystander intervention, and fear of being bullied) were all examined. Odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for covariates were calculated for the four bullying-related constructs (bullying witness, bullying involvement, bystander intervention, and reactions to being bullied) using structural family factors.

RESULTS

The result showed that all demographic household characteristics were associated with bullying at school except for being from a single-child family. Adolescents from rural families witnessed more bullying incidents than those from local families (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: [1.09, 1.68]). Adolescents who come from migrant families (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: [1.07, 1.43]) with a rural hukou (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: [1.00, 1.74]) and low parental education levels (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: [1.01, 2.57]) were more likely to be bullies. Adolescents who came from migrant families (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: [1.03, 1.82]), with low maternal education levels (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: [1.06, 1.91]) engaged in more negative bystander intervention behaviors. Furthermore, adolescents with less educated mothers experienced a higher fear of being bullied (never versus sometimes: OR = 1.33, 95% CI: [1.00, 1.85]; never versus usually OR = 1.39, 95% CI: [1.01, 1.20]).

CONCLUSIONS

A systematic examination of the relationship between school bullying and demographic household characteristics may be used to inform school policies on bullying, such as training management on the importance of paying attention to adolescents from disadvantage household backgrounds. Identifying demographic factors that may predict bullying can also be used to prevent individuals from becoming involved in bullying and reduce the related negative consequences from being bullied.

摘要

背景

各种家庭因素与学校欺凌有关,儿童和青少年参与欺凌行为。

方法

共有来自中国苏州市 22 所中学的 11919 名参与者(女性=6671 名,平均年龄=15 岁)完成了问卷。考察了结构家庭因素(家庭社会经济地位、居住安排、兄弟姐妹数量、是否为本地居民/移民、是否有城市/农村户口、父母和母亲的教育水平以及其他各种与欺凌相关的结构(即欺凌目击、欺凌参与、旁观者干预和对被欺凌的恐惧)与欺凌相关的结构(即欺凌目击、欺凌参与、旁观者干预和对被欺凌的恐惧)之间的关联。使用结构家庭因素为与欺凌相关的四个结构(欺凌目击、欺凌参与、旁观者干预和对被欺凌的反应)计算了调整协变量的比值比(OR)。

结果

结果表明,除了来自独生子女家庭外,所有人口统计学家庭特征都与学校欺凌有关。来自农村家庭的青少年比来自本地家庭的青少年目睹更多的欺凌事件(OR=1.35,95%CI:[1.09, 1.68])。来自移民家庭(OR=1.12,95%CI:[1.07, 1.43])、农村户口(OR=1.31,95%CI:[1.00, 1.74])和低父母教育水平(OR=1.42,95%CI:[1.01, 2.57])的青少年更有可能成为欺凌者。来自移民家庭(OR=1.37,95%CI:[1.03, 1.82])、母亲受教育程度较低(OR=1.42,95%CI:[1.06, 1.91])的青少年更倾向于采取消极的旁观者干预行为。此外,母亲教育程度较低的青少年更有可能害怕被欺负(从不与有时:OR=1.33,95%CI:[1.00, 1.85];从不与通常:OR=1.39,95%CI:[1.01, 1.20])。

结论

系统检查学校欺凌与人口统计学家庭特征之间的关系,可以为学校制定欺凌政策提供信息,例如培训管理人员关注来自弱势群体家庭背景的青少年。确定可能预测欺凌的人口统计学因素也可以用来防止个人参与欺凌,并减少被欺凌的相关负面后果。

相似文献

9
Asthma is associated with bullying victimization in rural adolescents.哮喘与农村青少年受欺凌有关。
J Asthma. 2023 Jul;60(7):1409-1417. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2151466. Epub 2023 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Family predictors of sibling versus peer victimization.家庭因素对同胞与同伴受欺负的预测作用。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Mar;34(2):186-195. doi: 10.1037/fam0000592. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
9
The effects of China's universal two-child policy.中国全面二孩政策的影响。
Lancet. 2016 Oct 15;388(10054):1930-1938. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31405-2.
10
Socioeconomic status and bullying: a meta-analysis.社会经济地位与欺凌:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jun;104(6):e48-59. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301960. Epub 2014 Apr 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验