Dalian Seventh People's Hospital, 179# Lingshui Road, Dalian, 116023, China.
Division of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 11;21(1):2249. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12367-3.
Various family factors have been identified in association with school bullying and the involvement of children and adolescents in bullying behaviors.
A total of 11,919 participants (female = 6671, mean age = 15) from 22 middle schools in Suzhou City, China completed the questionnaire. The associations between structural family factors (family socio-economic status, living arrangement, number of siblings, whether they were local residents/migrants, had an urban/rural hukou [a household registration system in China], parental and maternal education levels, and other various bullying-related constructs (i.e. bullying witnessing, bullying involvement, bystander intervention, and fear of being bullied) were all examined. Odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for covariates were calculated for the four bullying-related constructs (bullying witness, bullying involvement, bystander intervention, and reactions to being bullied) using structural family factors.
The result showed that all demographic household characteristics were associated with bullying at school except for being from a single-child family. Adolescents from rural families witnessed more bullying incidents than those from local families (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: [1.09, 1.68]). Adolescents who come from migrant families (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: [1.07, 1.43]) with a rural hukou (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: [1.00, 1.74]) and low parental education levels (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: [1.01, 2.57]) were more likely to be bullies. Adolescents who came from migrant families (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: [1.03, 1.82]), with low maternal education levels (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: [1.06, 1.91]) engaged in more negative bystander intervention behaviors. Furthermore, adolescents with less educated mothers experienced a higher fear of being bullied (never versus sometimes: OR = 1.33, 95% CI: [1.00, 1.85]; never versus usually OR = 1.39, 95% CI: [1.01, 1.20]).
A systematic examination of the relationship between school bullying and demographic household characteristics may be used to inform school policies on bullying, such as training management on the importance of paying attention to adolescents from disadvantage household backgrounds. Identifying demographic factors that may predict bullying can also be used to prevent individuals from becoming involved in bullying and reduce the related negative consequences from being bullied.
各种家庭因素与学校欺凌有关,儿童和青少年参与欺凌行为。
共有来自中国苏州市 22 所中学的 11919 名参与者(女性=6671 名,平均年龄=15 岁)完成了问卷。考察了结构家庭因素(家庭社会经济地位、居住安排、兄弟姐妹数量、是否为本地居民/移民、是否有城市/农村户口、父母和母亲的教育水平以及其他各种与欺凌相关的结构(即欺凌目击、欺凌参与、旁观者干预和对被欺凌的恐惧)与欺凌相关的结构(即欺凌目击、欺凌参与、旁观者干预和对被欺凌的恐惧)之间的关联。使用结构家庭因素为与欺凌相关的四个结构(欺凌目击、欺凌参与、旁观者干预和对被欺凌的反应)计算了调整协变量的比值比(OR)。
结果表明,除了来自独生子女家庭外,所有人口统计学家庭特征都与学校欺凌有关。来自农村家庭的青少年比来自本地家庭的青少年目睹更多的欺凌事件(OR=1.35,95%CI:[1.09, 1.68])。来自移民家庭(OR=1.12,95%CI:[1.07, 1.43])、农村户口(OR=1.31,95%CI:[1.00, 1.74])和低父母教育水平(OR=1.42,95%CI:[1.01, 2.57])的青少年更有可能成为欺凌者。来自移民家庭(OR=1.37,95%CI:[1.03, 1.82])、母亲受教育程度较低(OR=1.42,95%CI:[1.06, 1.91])的青少年更倾向于采取消极的旁观者干预行为。此外,母亲教育程度较低的青少年更有可能害怕被欺负(从不与有时:OR=1.33,95%CI:[1.00, 1.85];从不与通常:OR=1.39,95%CI:[1.01, 1.20])。
系统检查学校欺凌与人口统计学家庭特征之间的关系,可以为学校制定欺凌政策提供信息,例如培训管理人员关注来自弱势群体家庭背景的青少年。确定可能预测欺凌的人口统计学因素也可以用来防止个人参与欺凌,并减少被欺凌的相关负面后果。