Suppr超能文献

关于青少年饮食失调中性别差异的误解。

Myths Regarding Gender Differences in Eating Disorders in Adolescents.

作者信息

Erdoğdu Yildirim Ayşe Burcu, Gündoğdu Ümmügülsüm, Eroğlu Mehtap

出版信息

Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2024 Sep 19;36:27-35. doi: 10.5080/u27259.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Factors predicting eating disorder (ED) may vary among genders. This study investigated the gender specific influence of adolescents' social media use, body perception, depression and anxiety symptoms on eating disorder risk.

METHOD

The sample consisted of 183 adolescents aged 14 to 18 years (mean: 15.65±0.89). Sociodemographic information and data from the, Children's Depression Inventory (CDI), Social Media Attitude Scale (SMAS), Eating Disorder Examination Scale (EDES), Eating Attitudes Test (EAT), Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders Child Version (SCARED), and Body Cathexis Scale (BCS) were collected.

RESULTS

In this study, women have higher scores in SCARED (p<0.001), and lower scores in social competence subscale of SMAS (p=0.008) in comparison to men. Adolescents at risk for eating attitudes had higher scores in the CDI, the BCS, and the SMAS-Social Competence subscale, while adolescents at risk for eating disorder had higher scores in all scales except the SMAS-Relationship with Teachers subscale. Although depression and body perception influence women's' eating attitudes directly, social media revealed its effect on ED by the mediation of depressive symptoms. In men, social isolation, anxiety, and depression directly predicts ED, while social media enhanced the risk of ED by aggravating anxiety.

CONCLUSION

It is important to know the factors that influence the risk of ED in terms of gender, and effectively address adolescence's psychological and medical burden.

摘要

目的

预测饮食失调(ED)的因素可能因性别而异。本研究调查了青少年社交媒体使用、身体认知、抑郁和焦虑症状对饮食失调风险的性别特异性影响。

方法

样本包括183名14至18岁的青少年(平均年龄:15.65±0.89)。收集了社会人口统计学信息以及来自儿童抑郁量表(CDI)、社交媒体态度量表(SMAS)、饮食失调检查量表(EDES)、饮食态度测试(EAT)、儿童焦虑相关情绪障碍筛查量表儿童版(SCARED)和身体投入量表(BCS)的数据。

结果

在本研究中,与男性相比,女性在SCARED量表上得分更高(p<0.001),在SMAS量表的社交能力子量表上得分更低(p=0.008)。有饮食态度风险的青少年在CDI、BCS和SMAS社交能力子量表上得分更高,而有饮食失调风险的青少年在除SMAS师生关系子量表外的所有量表上得分更高。虽然抑郁和身体认知直接影响女性的饮食态度,但社交媒体通过抑郁症状的中介作用显示出对饮食失调的影响。在男性中,社交隔离、焦虑和抑郁直接预测饮食失调,而社交媒体通过加重焦虑增加了饮食失调的风险。

结论

了解影响饮食失调风险的性别因素,并有效减轻青少年的心理和医疗负担非常重要。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
The enigma of male eating disorders: A critical review and synthesis.男性饮食失调之谜:批判性回顾与综合。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Nov;57:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
8
Social Media: Challenges and Concerns for Families.社交媒体:家庭面临的挑战与担忧
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016 Oct;63(5):841-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2016.06.009.
9
Binge-Eating Disorder Comes of Age.暴饮暴食症步入成年期。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Sep 20;165(6):445-6. doi: 10.7326/M16-1398. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
10
Eating Disorders in Adolescent and Young Adult Males: Presenting Characteristics.青少年和青年男性的饮食失调:表现特征
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Oct;59(4):397-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验