Research Note: Effects of on-farm and hatchery hatching on broiler performance, intestinal lesions, and immune response during a subclinical necrotic enteritis challenge.

The effects of traditional and on-farm hatching systems on broiler performance and health under a subclinical necrotic enteritis (NE) challenge were evaluated in this study. A 2×2 factorial study explored the effects of place of hatch (on-farm hatched [OFH] vs. hatchery hatched [HH]) and NE challenge (nonchallenged vs. challenged) on broilers. Cobb 500 eggs (∼E19) were acquired from a commercial hatchery; 840 eggs were placed in pens on clean shavings in prewarmed floor pens and allowed to hatch out, while 927 eggs were placed in a hatcher set under standard practices. On day (d) of hatch, all chicks were weighed and randomly distributed to 4 treatments (8 replicate pens each and 30 birds/pen). The OFH birds were placed immediately after sorting while HH birds were placed back in the hatcher overnight to simulate commercial hatchery procedures. After placing HH birds, feed and litter in the challenge group pens were sprayed with a live oocyst coccidia vaccine as a predisposing factor to NE. The small intestines of 3 male chicks per pen were scored for NE lesions (n = 24) on d 8 (peak NE challenge) and jejunal samples were collected from 1 bird per pen for RNA extraction and qPCR on d 8 and d 14. Data were analyzed using JMP Pro17 and significance between treatments was identified by LSD (P ≤ 0.05). Regardless of the hatching system, the subclinical NE challenge caused a significant reduction in average daily gain (ADG) and average daily feed intake (ADFI), and increased feed conversion ratio (FCR) until d 28 (P ≤ 0.05). Moreover, OFH birds exhibited significantly better growth (P ≤ 0.05) through d 28 but had similar performance to HH birds by d 42. There were no significant differences in NE lesion scores between HH and OFH groups. In conclusion, OFH system resulted in better broiler performance compared to HH system under both no-challenge and challenge conditions during the starter and grower periods. This practice may hold potential for further exploration by the industry as an alternative to traditional hatching, aiming to improve the welfare and productivity of broilers.