Suppr超能文献

野生豹猫()标本的临床和诊断评估。

Clinical and diagnostic evaluation of a wild ocelot () specimen.

机构信息

Grupo de Investigación en Medicina Veterinaria (GINVER), Corporación Universitaria Remington, Medellín, Colombia.

Panthera Colombia, Bogota, Colombia.

出版信息

Open Vet J. 2024 Aug;14(8):1866-1876. doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i8.15. Epub 2024 Aug 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Monitoring the health of wild animals under the principles of one health contributes to the prevention of diseases and the preservation of human and animal health, thus contributing to the conservation of species.

AIM

The current study describes the clinical and paraclinical status of an ocelot () captured in Buriticá, Antioquia, Colombia, for research purposes with the aim of contributing to the construction of animal health reference values in the wild, considering the scarcity of published data for the country on capture, management, and paraclinical parameters related to this species.

METHODS

For this, hematological parameters, blood chemistry, urine cytochemical analyses, and coprological examinations were carried out.

RESULTS

The hematological values of the captured individual do not show relevant differences concerning those reported in the literature in both captive and free specimens. However, differences were identified between the reference blood chemistry and urine cytochemical values between reports of animals in captivity and the wild, revealing the need to develop reference standards for animals in the wild that guarantee adequate management of these species and favor their conservation. A possible picture of renal failure and multiple parasitic infections of epidemiological importance was found.

CONCLUSION

This study reports for the first time a urine infection by . and an infection by spp. in fecal matter for the species.

摘要

背景

在“同一健康”原则下监测野生动物的健康状况有助于预防疾病和保护人类及动物健康,从而有助于物种保护。

目的

本研究描述了在哥伦比亚安蒂奥基亚省的布里蒂卡捕获的一只豹猫的临床和临床前状况,旨在为野生动物健康参考值的构建做出贡献,考虑到该国关于该物种的捕获、管理和临床前参数的相关数据稀缺。

方法

为此,进行了血液学参数、血液化学、尿液细胞学分析和粪便检查。

结果

捕获个体的血液学值与文献中报道的圈养和自由标本的血液学值没有明显差异。然而,在圈养和野生动物的参考血液化学和尿液细胞学值之间发现了差异,这表明需要为野生动物制定参考标准,以保证对这些物种的适当管理,促进其保护。可能存在肾衰竭和多种寄生虫感染的情况,这些感染具有流行病学意义。

结论

本研究首次报告了尿液中感染了 和粪便中感染了 的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab7f/11415929/7c8d78e2f38a/OpenVetJ-14-1866-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验