Suppr超能文献

火针疗法与常规护理治疗帕金森病相关慢性疼痛的一项初步随机对照试验

Fire Needling Therapy versus Usual Care for Parkinson's Disease-Related Chronic Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Wang Mina, Ren Yashuo, Xiao Hongli, Liu Anming, Ma Chunying, Li Zhuohao, Wang Zixi, Xia Qiuyu, Dou Pu, Li Bin, Chen Peng

机构信息

Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.

Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100010, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2024 Sep 18;17:3021-3030. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S485481. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Parkinson's disease (PD)-related chronic pain is a prevalent non-motor symptom, this study aimed to detect the effect and safety of fire needling therapy (FNT) for PD-related chronic pain relief.

METHODS

Patients with PD-related chronic pain were randomly allocated to FNT group and control group with a treatment phase of 8 weeks and a follow-up phase of 4 weeks. Primary outcome was the King's Parkinson's Pain Scale (KPPS), Secondary outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III (UPDRS-III), and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39). Study was registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registered number: ChiCTR2400084951).

RESULTS

60 participants were randomized, with 30 in the FNT group and 30 in the control group. KPPS was significantly influenced by the interaction of treatment and time, with a significant reduction in pain observed in the FNT group compared to the control group at Week 4 (difference [95% CI]: -20.693[-27.619,-13.767], P<0.001), Week 8 (difference [95% CI]: 44.680[-52.359,-37.000], P<0.001), and Week 12 (difference [95% CI]: -44.982[-52.771,-37.193], P<0.001). For VAS, UPDRS-III, and PDQ-39, there were significant differences between groups at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12.

CONCLUSION

FNT could be an effective and safe method for managing PD-related chronic pain. However, large-sample studies conducted in multiple centers are necessary to further verify the findings in the future.

摘要

引言

帕金森病(PD)相关的慢性疼痛是一种常见的非运动症状,本研究旨在检测火针疗法(FNT)缓解PD相关慢性疼痛的疗效和安全性。

方法

将PD相关慢性疼痛患者随机分为FNT组和对照组,治疗期为8周,随访期为4周。主要结局指标为国王帕金森疼痛量表(KPPS),次要结局指标包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分(UPDRS-III)和帕金森病问卷-39(PDQ-39)。该研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:ChiCTR2400084951)。

结果

60名参与者被随机分组,FNT组30名,对照组30名。KPPS受到治疗与时间交互作用的显著影响,与对照组相比,FNT组在第4周(差值[95%CI]:-20.693[-27.619,-13.767],P<0.001)、第8周(差值[95%CI]:44.680[-52.359,-37.000],P<0.001)和第12周(差值[95%CI]:-44.982[-52.771,-37.193],P<0.001)时疼痛显著减轻。对于VAS、UPDRS-III和PDQ-39,在第4周、第8周和第12周时两组之间存在显著差异。

结论

火针疗法可能是一种有效且安全的管理PD相关慢性疼痛的方法。然而,未来有必要进行多中心大样本研究以进一步验证这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b74/11416792/ad356537608e/JPR-17-3021-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验