• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么工人会产生有偏差的风险认知?对工人不安全行为评估中的锚定效应及影响因素的分析。

Why do Workers Generate Biased Risk Perceptions? An Analysis of Anchoring Effects and Influential Factors in Workers' Assessment of Unsafe Behavior.

作者信息

Qiu Zunxiang, Liu Quanlong, Li Xinchun, Zhang Yueqian

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.

Key Construction Bases of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Jiangsu Universities (Safety Management Research Center), China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.

出版信息

Saf Health Work. 2024 Sep;15(3):300-309. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.shaw.2024.05.004
PMID:39309282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11410718/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk perception plays a crucial role in workers' unsafe behaviors. However, little research has explored why workers generate biased risk perceptions, namely underestimating or overestimating the risks of unsafe actions. Cognitive biases in risk perception arise from uncertainties about the dangers of unsafe behaviors. As a typical heuristic strategy, the anchoring effect is critical in decision-making under uncertain conditions. Consequently, this study empirically analyzed the influence of anchoring effects on workers' risk perception.

METHODS

In 2022, a survey was conducted with 1,418 coal mine workers from Shanxi Province, China. The survey instruments assessed workers' risk perception of unsafe behavior, anchoring effects, need for cognition, and safety knowledge. Multivariable linear regression models were employed to analyze the associations among these variables.

RESULTS

The findings verified the proposed anchoring effects. Specifically, experimenter-provided high-risk anchors led workers to overestimate unsafe behavior risks, thus reducing their tendency to engage in such behavior. In contrast, experimenter-provided low-risk anchors and accident-injury experiences (self-generated anchors) decreased workers' risk perception, increasing their propensity to engage in unsafe behavior. Additionally, workers' safety knowledge and need for cognition significantly affected anchoring effects.

CONCLUSION

This research enhances workplace safety studies by applying the anchoring effect from psychology to risk perception research. Suggestions for improving risk perception encompass implementing hazard warnings, fostering safety education, and providing training. Furthermore, managers should give special attention to workers with accident-injury experience and promptly correct their accident fluke mentality, thereby improving overall risk awareness.

摘要

背景

风险认知在工人的不安全行为中起着至关重要的作用。然而,很少有研究探讨为什么工人会产生有偏差的风险认知,即低估或高估不安全行为的风险。风险认知中的认知偏差源于对不安全行为危险的不确定性。作为一种典型的启发式策略,锚定效应在不确定条件下的决策中至关重要。因此,本研究实证分析了锚定效应对工人风险认知的影响。

方法

2022年,对来自中国山西省的1418名煤矿工人进行了一项调查。调查工具评估了工人对不安全行为的风险认知、锚定效应、认知需求和安全知识。采用多变量线性回归模型分析这些变量之间的关联。

结果

研究结果验证了所提出的锚定效应。具体而言,实验者提供的高风险锚点导致工人高估不安全行为风险,从而降低他们从事此类行为的倾向。相比之下,实验者提供的低风险锚点和事故伤害经历(自我产生的锚点)降低了工人的风险认知,增加了他们从事不安全行为的倾向。此外,工人的安全知识和认知需求显著影响锚定效应。

结论

本研究通过将心理学中的锚定效应应用于风险认知研究,增强了对工作场所安全的研究。改善风险认知的建议包括实施危险警告、加强安全教育和提供培训。此外,管理人员应特别关注有事故伤害经历的工人,并及时纠正他们的事故侥幸心理,从而提高整体风险意识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11f/11410718/14c22274cd78/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11f/11410718/f7724682677c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11f/11410718/14c22274cd78/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11f/11410718/f7724682677c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e11f/11410718/14c22274cd78/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Why do Workers Generate Biased Risk Perceptions? An Analysis of Anchoring Effects and Influential Factors in Workers' Assessment of Unsafe Behavior.为什么工人会产生有偏差的风险认知?对工人不安全行为评估中的锚定效应及影响因素的分析。
Saf Health Work. 2024 Sep;15(3):300-309. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 May 28.
2
Research on Unsafe Behavior of Construction Workers Under the Bidirectional Effect of Formal Rule Awareness and Conformity Mentality.正式规则意识与从众心理双向作用下建筑工人不安全行为研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 15;12:794394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.794394. eCollection 2021.
3
Understanding the Sociocognitive Process of Construction Workers' Unsafe Behaviors: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach.理解建筑工人不安全行为的社会认知过程:基于代理的建模方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 1;17(5):1588. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051588.
4
Critical factors and paths influencing construction workers' safety risk tolerances.影响建筑工人安全风险容忍度的关键因素和路径。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Aug;93:267-279. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.027. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
5
Evaluating the Consistency Between Conceptual Frameworks and Factors Influencing the Safe Behavior of Iranian Workers in the Petrochemical Industry: Mixed Methods Study.评估概念框架与影响伊朗石化行业工人安全行为因素之间的一致性:混合方法研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 May 27;7(5):e22851. doi: 10.2196/22851.
6
Grounded Theory and Social Psychology Approach to Investigating the Formation of Construction Workers' Unsafe Behaviour.扎根理论与社会心理学方法在探究建筑工人不安全行为形成过程中的应用。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 18;2022:3581563. doi: 10.1155/2022/3581563. eCollection 2022.
7
Effects of human and organizational deficiencies on workers' safety behavior at a mining site in Iran.伊朗一矿区人为和组织缺陷对工人安全行为的影响。
Epidemiol Health. 2018 May 18;40:e2018019. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2018019. eCollection 2018.
8
Impact of physical and mental fatigue on construction workers' unsafe behavior based on physiological measurement.基于生理测量的身心疲劳对建筑工人不安全行为的影响。
J Safety Res. 2023 Jun;85:457-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.04.014. Epub 2023 May 5.
9
Study on Influencing Factors of Construction Workers' Unsafe Behavior Based on Text Mining.基于文本挖掘的建筑工人不安全行为影响因素研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 19;13:886390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886390. eCollection 2022.
10
The Impact of Emotional States on Construction Workers' Recognition Ability of Safety Hazards Based on Social Cognitive Neuroscience.基于社会认知神经科学的情绪状态对建筑工人安全隐患识别能力的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 16;13:895929. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895929. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of warning design features on risk perception and performance in remote emergency response.警示设计特征对远程应急响应中风险认知及表现的影响
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 12;15(1):25201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10872-8.
2
A Data-Driven Analysis of Work-Related Accidents in the Brazilian Mining Sector (2019-2022).巴西矿业部门与工作相关事故的数据分析(2019 - 2022年)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 14;22(6):939. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060939.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of safety leadership on nurses' safety behavior: The mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation.安全领导力对护士安全行为的影响:安全知识与动机的中介作用
J Safety Res. 2023 Feb;84:117-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.10.013. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
2
The Role of Personal Risk Experience-An Investigation of Health and Terrorism Risk Perception in Germany and Israel.个人风险体验的作用——德国和以色列的健康和恐怖主义风险认知调查。
Risk Anal. 2022 Apr;42(4):818-829. doi: 10.1111/risa.13804. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
3
Risky scenario identification in a risk perception scale for construction workers in Thailand.
泰国建筑工人风险感知量表中的风险情景识别。
J Safety Res. 2021 Sep;78:105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
4
NOSACQ-50 for Safety Climate Assessment in Agricultural Activities: A Case Study in Central Italy.NOSACQ-50 用于农业活动安全氛围评估:意大利中部的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 8;17(24):9177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249177.
5
Risk Perception: Reflections on 40 Years of Research.风险认知:对40年研究的反思
Risk Anal. 2020 Nov;40(S1):2191-2206. doi: 10.1111/risa.13599. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
6
Quantification of risk perception: Development and validation of the construction worker risk perception (CoWoRP) scale.风险感知的量化:建筑工人风险感知(CoWoRP)量表的编制与验证。
J Safety Res. 2019 Dec;71:25-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
7
A dual perspective on risk perception and its effect on safety behavior: A moderated mediation model of safety motivation, and supervisor's and coworkers' safety climate.从双重角度看待风险感知及其对安全行为的影响:安全动机、主管和同事的安全氛围的中介调节模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jan;134:105350. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105350. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
8
Cognitive Biases of Consumers' Risk Perception of Foodborne Diseases in China: Examining Anchoring Effect.消费者对中国食源性疾病风险感知的认知偏差:锚定效应的检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 27;16(13):2268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132268.
9
The Influence of Safety Climate, Safety Leadership, Workload, and Accident Experiences on Risk Perception: A Study of Korean Manufacturing Workers.安全氛围、安全领导力、工作负荷及事故经历对风险认知的影响:一项针对韩国制造业工人的研究
Saf Health Work. 2018 Dec;9(4):427-433. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
10
The Very Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition: Developing a Six-Item Version.认知需求的高效评估:开发一个六项版本。
Assessment. 2020 Dec;27(8):1870-1885. doi: 10.1177/1073191118793208. Epub 2018 Aug 10.