Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 2025 Feb;93(2):643-656. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30303. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
To compare the performance of a learned magnetization-prepared gradient echo (L-MPGRE) sequence against a commonly used sequence for 3D T and T mapping of the knee joint, the magnetization-prepared angle-modulated partitioned k-space spoiled gradient echo snapshots (MAPSS), on bi-exponential (BE), stretched-exponential (SE), and mono-exponential (ME) relaxation models.
We used a combined differentiable and non-differentiable optimization to learn pulse sequence structure and its parameters for 3D T and T mapping of the knee joint using ME, SE, and BE models. The learned pulse sequence framework was used to improve quantitative accuracy and SNR and to reduce filtering effects. We compare the measured multi-compartment values between the two sequences (n = 8), and their repeatability (n = 4) in healthy volunteers (n = 12 total).
The voxel-wise median absolute percentage difference (MAPD) between the T and T maps obtained with each sequence was 18.6% and 19.9%, respectively. The T and T repeatability tests showed a MAPD of 18.5% and 19.1% for MAPSS, and 16.8% and 15.5% for L-MPGRE. Bland-Altman region of interest (ROI)-wise analysis shows that bias is small, close to -1.5%, and the coefficient of variation is around 5.5% when comparing ROIs from both sequences.
The L-MPGRE sequences can be used as a replacement for MAPSS for T and T mapping in the knee cartilage with advantages, achieving similar accuracy and 15% better repeatability in only half of its scan time.
比较一种基于学习的磁化准备梯度回波(L-MPGRE)序列与一种常用于膝关节 3D T 和 T 映射的序列(磁化准备角调制分区 K 空间扰相梯度回波快照,MAPSS)在双指数(BE)、拉伸指数(SE)和单指数(ME)弛豫模型下的性能。
我们使用一种结合了可微和不可微优化的方法,基于 ME、SE 和 BE 模型学习膝关节 3D T 和 T 映射的脉冲序列结构及其参数。所学习的脉冲序列框架用于提高定量准确性和 SNR,并减少滤波效应。我们比较了两种序列(n=8)之间的多室值测量值,以及在健康志愿者(n=12 总)中的重复性(n=4)。
两种序列获得的 T 和 T 图的体素中位数绝对百分比差异(MAPD)分别为 18.6%和 19.9%。T 和 T 重复性测试显示 MAPSS 的 MAPD 为 18.5%和 19.1%,L-MPGRE 的 MAPD 为 16.8%和 15.5%。Bland-Altman 感兴趣区(ROI)-wise 分析显示,两种序列的 ROI 之间的偏差较小,接近-1.5%,变异系数约为 5.5%。
L-MPGRE 序列可替代 MAPSS 用于膝关节软骨的 T 和 T 映射,具有优势,在扫描时间减半的情况下,可实现相似的准确性和 15%更好的重复性。