• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球卫生治理中的权力不对称:分析健康不平等的政治经济决定因素的概念框架。

Power asymmetries in global governance for health: a conceptual framework for analyzing the political-economic determinants of health inequities.

机构信息

Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.

Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0516-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12992-019-0516-4
PMID:31775894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6881908/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent scholarship has increasingly identified global power asymmetries as the root cause of health inequities. This article examines how such asymmetries manifest in global governance for health, and how this impacts health outcomes.

RESULTS

We focus on the political-economic determinants of global health inequities, and how these determinants operate at different levels of social action (micro, meso, and macro) through distinct but interacting mechanisms. To clarify how these mechanisms operate, we develop an integrative framework for examining the links between global neoliberalism-the currently dominant policy paradigm premised on advancing the reach of markets and promoting ever-growing international economic integration-and global health inequities, and show how these mechanisms have macro-macro, macro-meso-macro, and macro-micro-macro manifestations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our approach enables the design of theoretically-nuanced empirical strategies to document the multiple ways in which the political economy entrenches or, alternatively, might ameliorate global health inequities.

摘要

背景

最近的学术研究越来越多地指出,全球权力不对称是健康不平等的根源。本文探讨了这些不对称现象如何在全球卫生治理中表现出来,以及这如何影响健康结果。

结果

我们关注全球卫生不平等的政治经济决定因素,以及这些决定因素如何通过不同但相互作用的机制在社会行动的不同层面(微观、中观和宏观)运作。为了澄清这些机制的运作方式,我们制定了一个综合框架,用于研究全球新自由主义(目前占主导地位的政策范式,其前提是扩大市场的影响力,促进不断增长的国际经济一体化)与全球卫生不平等之间的联系,并展示这些机制如何在宏观-宏观、宏观-中观-宏观和宏观-微观-宏观层面表现出来。

结论

我们的方法使设计理论上细致的经验策略成为可能,以记录政治经济巩固或可能缓解全球卫生不平等的多种方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a762/6881908/e0b32c0356ac/12992_2019_516_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a762/6881908/e0b32c0356ac/12992_2019_516_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a762/6881908/e0b32c0356ac/12992_2019_516_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Power asymmetries in global governance for health: a conceptual framework for analyzing the political-economic determinants of health inequities.全球卫生治理中的权力不对称:分析健康不平等的政治经济决定因素的概念框架。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0516-4.
2
Bringing (domestic) politics back in: global and local influences on health equity.将(国内)政治因素纳入考量:全球与地方对健康公平性的影响
Public Health. 2015 Jul;129(7):843-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
3
Globalisation and neoliberalism as structural drivers of health inequities.全球化和新自由主义是健康不平等的结构性驱动因素。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Oct 9;16(Suppl 1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0365-2.
4
Power in global governance: an expanded typology from global health.全球治理中的权力:来自全球卫生的扩展类型学。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0515-5.
5
Global Health Governance and Global Power: A Critical Commentary on the Lancet-University of Oslo Commission Report.全球卫生治理与全球权力:对《柳叶刀》-奥斯陆大学委员会报告的批判性评论
Int J Health Serv. 2016;46(2):346-65. doi: 10.1177/0020731416631734. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
Editorial: the political determinants of health inequities and universal health coverage.社论:健康不平等与全民健康覆盖的政治决定因素
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0514-6.
7
Characterizing street-connected children and youths' social and health inequities in Kenya: a qualitative study.描述肯尼亚街头流浪儿童和青少年的社会和健康不平等现象:一项定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Aug 28;19(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01255-8.
8
Crowdfunding and global health disparities: an exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis.众筹与全球健康差距:探索性概念与实证分析。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0519-1.
9
The global diabetes epidemic and the nonprofit state corporate complex: Equity implications of discourses, research agendas, and policy recommendations of diabetes nonprofit organizations.全球糖尿病流行与非营利性国家企业综合体:糖尿病非营利组织的话语、研究议程和政策建议的公平性影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;223:77-88. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
10
Towards Critical Analysis of the Political Determinants of Health Comment on "How Neoliberalism Is Shaping the Supply of Unhealthy Commodities and What This Means for NCD Prevention".对“新自由主义如何塑造不健康商品的供应以及这对非传染性疾病预防意味着什么”一文的政治决定因素的批判性分析
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Mar 1;9(3):121-123. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.102.

引用本文的文献

1
Creating different global health futures: mapping the health research ecosystem and taking decolonial action.创造不同的全球健康未来:绘制健康研究生态系统并采取去殖民化行动。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12566-3.
2
Advancing the Study of Power: Opportunities and Priorities for Understanding Population Health Inequities.推动权力研究:理解人群健康不平等的机遇与优先事项
Am J Public Health. 2025 Jun;115(6):883-889. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2025.308015. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
3
Re-politicizing the WHO's social determinants of health framework.

本文引用的文献

1
Globalization and health equity: The impact of structural adjustment programs on developing countries.全球化与卫生公平:结构调整计划对发展中国家的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Dec;267:112496. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112496. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
2
How structural adjustment programs affect inequality: A disaggregated analysis of IMF conditionality, 1980-2014.结构调整计划如何影响不平等:对国际货币基金组织条件性的 1980-2014 年的分解分析。
Soc Sci Res. 2019 May;80:83-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
3
Revisiting the Corporate and Commercial Determinants of Health.
重新政治化世界卫生组织的健康社会决定因素框架。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Oct 1;39(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae122.
4
'Our project, your problem?' A case study of the WHO's mRNA technology transfer programme in South Africa.“我们的项目,你的问题?” 世界卫生组织在南非的信使核糖核酸技术转让计划案例研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Sep 23;4(9):e0003173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003173. eCollection 2024.
5
Building a Systems Map: Applying Systems Thinking to Unhealthy Commodity Industry Influence on Public Health Policy.构建系统图:将系统思维应用于不健康商品行业对公共卫生政策的影响。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:7872. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.7872. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
6
The impact of shifts in PEPFAR funding policy on HIV services in Eastern Uganda (2015-21).PEPFAR 资金政策转变对乌干达东部地区 HIV 服务的影响(2015-2021 年)。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Jan 23;39(Supplement_1):i21-i32. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad096.
7
Shared health governance, mutual collective accountability, and transparency in COVAX: A qualitative study triangulating data from document sampling and key informant interviews.共卫生治理、相互集体问责制以及 COVAX 的透明度:一项对文件抽样和关键知情人访谈数据进行三角分析的定性研究。
J Glob Health. 2023 Dec 8;13:04165. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04165.
8
How and why snakebite became a global health priority: a policy analysis.蛇伤为何及如何成为全球卫生重点:政策分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Aug;8(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011923.
9
Taking on the Commercial Determinants of Health at the level of actors, practices and systems.从行为者、实践和系统层面着手应对健康的商业决定因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;10:981039. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.981039. eCollection 2022.
10
Investigating Employment Quality for Population Health and Health Equity: A Perspective of Power.研究人口健康和健康公平的就业质量:权力视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 13;19(16):9991. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169991.
重新审视健康的企业和商业决定因素。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Sep;108(9):1167-1170. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304510. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
4
Defining the global health system and systematically mapping its network of actors.定义全球卫生系统,并系统绘制其行为体网络。
Global Health. 2018 Apr 17;14(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0340-2.
5
Science organisations and Coca-Cola's 'war' with the public health community: insights from an internal industry document.科学组织与可口可乐公司同公共卫生界的“战争”:一份行业内部文件的启示。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Sep;72(9):761-763. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-210375. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
6
Understanding the micro and macro politics of health: Inequalities, intersectionality & institutions - A research agenda.理解健康的微观和宏观政治:不平等、交叉性与机构 - 研究议程。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;200:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Jan 28.
7
Crucial role of finance ministry in achieving universal health coverage.财政部在实现全民健康覆盖方面的关键作用。
Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2415-2417. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33077-5. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
8
Role for academic institutions and think tanks in speeding progress on sustainable development goals.学术机构和智库在加速实现可持续发展目标方面的作用。
BMJ. 2017 Jul 24;358:j3519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3519.
9
Impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement on high-fructose corn syrup supply in Canada: a natural experiment using synthetic control methods.北美自由贸易协定对加拿大高果糖玉米糖浆供应的影响:使用合成控制法的自然实验。
CMAJ. 2017 Jul 4;189(26):E881-E887. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.161152.
10
Ten years after the financial crisis: The long reach of austerity and its global impacts on health.金融危机十年后:紧缩政策的深远影响及其对全球健康的冲击。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Aug;187:203-207. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.026. Epub 2017 Jun 22.